Ginzburg–Landau equation

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:For The Ginzburg–Landau equation, named after Vitaly Ginzburg and Lev Landau, describes the nonlinear evolution of small disturbances near a finite wavelength bifurcation from a stable to an unstable state of a system. At the onset of finite wavelength bifurcation, the system becomes unstable for a critical wavenumber kc which is non-zero. In the neighbourhood of this bifurcation, the evolution of disturbances is characterised by the particular Fourier mode for kc with slowly varying amplitude A (more precisely the real part of A). The Ginzburg–Landau equation is the governing equation for A. The unstable modes can either be non-oscillatory (stationary) or oscillatory.[1][2]

For non-oscillatory bifurcation, A satisfies the real Ginzburg–Landau equation

∂A∂t=∇2A+A−A|A|2

which was first derived by Alan C. Newell and John A. Whitehead[3] and by Lee Segel[4] in 1969. For oscillatory bifurcation, A satisfies the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation

∂A∂t=(1+iα)∇2A+A−(1+iβ)A|A|2

which was first derived by Keith Stewartson and John Trevor Stuart in 1971.[5] Here α and β are real constants.

When the problem is homogeneous, i.e., when A is independent of the spatial coordinates, the Ginzburg–Landau equation reduces to Stuart–Landau equation. The Swift–Hohenberg equation results in the Ginzburg–Landau equation.

Substituting A(𝐱,t)=ReiΘ, where R=|A| is the amplitude and Θ=arg(A) is the phase, one obtains the following equations

∂R∂t=[∇2R−R(∇Θ)2]−α(2∇Θ⋅∇R+R∇2Θ)+(1−R2)R,R∂Θ∂t=α[∇2R−R(∇Θ)2]+(2∇Θ⋅∇R+R∇2Θ)−βR3.

Some solutions of the real Ginzburg–Landau equation

Steady plane-wave type

If we substitute A=f(k)ei𝐤⋅𝐱 in the real equation without the time derivative term, we obtain

A(𝐱)=1−k2ei𝐤⋅𝐱,|k|<1.

This solution is known to become unstable due to Eckhaus instability for wavenumbers k2>1/3.

Steady solution with absorbing boundary condition

Once again, let us look for steady solutions, but with an absorbing boundary condition A=0 at some location. In a semi-infinite, 1D domain 0≤x<∞, the solution is given by

A(x)=eiatanh⁡x2,

where a is an arbitrary real constant. Similar solutions can be constructed numerically in a finite domain.

Some solutions of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation

Traveling wave

The traveling wave solution is given by

A(𝐱,t)=1−k2ei𝐤⋅𝐱−iωt,ω=β+(α−β)k2,|k|<1.

The group velocity of the wave is given by dω/dk=2(α−β)k. The above solution becomes unstable due to Benjamin–Feir instability for wavenumbers k2>(1+αβ)/(2β2+αβ+3).

Hocking–Stewartson pulse

Hocking–Stewartson pulse refers to a quasi-steady, 1D solution of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, obtained by Leslie M. Hocking and Keith Stewartson in 1972.[6] The solution is given by

A(x,t)=λLeiνt(sechλx)1+iM

where the four real constants in the above solution satisfy

λ2(M2+2α−1)=1,λ2(α−αM2+2M)=ν,
2−M2−3αM=−L2,2α+3M−αM2=−βL2.

Coherent structure solutions

The coherent structure solutions are obtained by assuming A=ei𝐤⋅𝐱−ωtB(𝝃,t) where 𝝃=𝐱+𝐮t. This leads to

∂B∂t+𝐯⋅∇B=(1+iα)∇2B+λB−(1+iβ)B|B|2

where 𝐯=𝐮+(1+iα)𝐤 and λ=1+iω−(1+iα)k2.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

  1. ↑ Cross, M. C., & Hohenberg, P. C. (1993). Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Reviews of modern physics, 65(3), 851.
  2. ↑ Cross, M., & Greenside, H. (2009). Pattern formation and dynamics in nonequilibrium systems. Cambridge University Press.
  3. ↑ Newell, A. C., & Whitehead, J. A. (1969). Finite bandwidth, finite amplitude convection. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 38(2), 279-303.
  4. ↑ Segel, L. A. (1969). Distant side-walls cause slow amplitude modulation of cellular convection. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 38(1), 203-224.
  5. ↑ Stewartson, K., & Stuart, J. T. (1971). A non-linear instability theory for a wave system in plane Poiseuille flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 48(3), 529-545.
  6. ↑ Hocking, L. M., & Stewartson, K. (1972). On the nonlinear response of a marginally unstable plane parallel flow to a two-dimensional disturbance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 326(1566), 289-313.