Gauss's continued fraction

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In complex analysis, Gauss's continued fraction is a particular class of continued fractions derived from hypergeometric functions. It was one of the first analytic continued fractions known to mathematics, and it can be used to represent several important elementary functions, as well as some of the more complicated transcendental functions.

History

Lambert published several examples of continued fractions in this form in 1768, and both Euler and Lagrange investigated similar constructions,[1] but it was Carl Friedrich Gauss who utilized the algebra described in the next section to deduce the general form of this continued fraction, in 1813.[2]

Although Gauss gave the form of this continued fraction, he did not give a proof of its convergence properties. Bernhard Riemann[3] and L.W. Thomé[4] obtained partial results, but the final word on the region in which this continued fraction converges was not given until 1901, by Edward Burr Van Vleck.[5]

Derivation

Let f0,f1,f2, be a sequence of analytic functions that obey the three-term recurrence relation

fi1=fi+kizfi+1

for all i>0, where the ki are constants.

Then

fi1fi=1+kizfi+1fi, and so fifi1=11+kizfi+1fi

Setting gi=fi/fi1,

gi=11+kizgi+1,

So

g1=f1f0=11+k1zg2=11+k1z1+k2zg3=11+k1z1+k2z1+k3zg4=. 

Repeating this ad infinitum produces the continued fraction expression

f1f0=11+k1z1+k2z1+k3z1+

In Gauss's continued fraction, the functions fi are hypergeometric functions of the form 0F1, 1F1, and 2F1, and the equations fi1fi=kizfi+1 arise as identities between functions where the parameters differ by integer amounts. These identities can be proven in several ways, for example by expanding out the series and comparing coefficients, or by taking the derivative in several ways and eliminating it from the equations generated.

The series 0F1

The simplest case involves

0F1(a;z)=1+1a1!z+1a(a+1)2!z2+1a(a+1)(a+2)3!z3+.

Starting with the identity

0F1(a1;z)0F1(a;z)=za(a1)0F1(a+1;z),

we may take

fi=0F1(a+i;z),ki=1(a+i)(a+i1),

giving

0F1(a+1;z)0F1(a;z)=11+1a(a+1)z1+1(a+1)(a+2)z1+1(a+2)(a+3)z1+

or

0F1(a+1;z)a0F1(a;z)=1a+z(a+1)+z(a+2)+z(a+3)+.

This expansion converges to the meromorphic function defined by the ratio of the two convergent series (provided, of course, that a is neither zero nor a negative integer).

The series 1F1

The next case involves

1F1(a;b;z)=1+ab1!z+a(a+1)b(b+1)2!z2+a(a+1)(a+2)b(b+1)(b+2)3!z3+

for which the two identities

1F1(a;b1;z)1F1(a+1;b;z)=(ab+1)zb(b1)1F1(a+1;b+1;z)
1F1(a;b1;z)1F1(a;b;z)=azb(b1)1F1(a+1;b+1;z)

are used alternately.

Let

f0(z)=1F1(a;b;z),
f1(z)=1F1(a+1;b+1;z),
f2(z)=1F1(a+1;b+2;z),
f3(z)=1F1(a+2;b+3;z),
f4(z)=1F1(a+2;b+4;z),

etc.

This gives fi1fi=kizfi+1 where k1=abb(b+1),k2=a+1(b+1)(b+2),k3=ab1(b+2)(b+3),k4=a+2(b+3)(b+4), producing

1F1(a+1;b+1;z)1F1(a;b;z)=11+abb(b+1)z1+a+1(b+1)(b+2)z1+ab1(b+2)(b+3)z1+a+2(b+3)(b+4)z1+

or

1F1(a+1;b+1;z)b1F1(a;b;z)=1b+(ab)z(b+1)+(a+1)z(b+2)+(ab1)z(b+3)+(a+2)z(b+4)+

Similarly

1F1(a;b+1;z)1F1(a;b;z)=11+ab(b+1)z1+ab1(b+1)(b+2)z1+a+1(b+2)(b+3)z1+ab2(b+3)(b+4)z1+

or

1F1(a;b+1;z)b1F1(a;b;z)=1b+az(b+1)+(ab1)z(b+2)+(a+1)z(b+3)+(ab2)z(b+4)+

Since 1F1(0;b;z)=1, setting a to 0 and replacing b + 1 with b in the first continued fraction gives a simplified special case:

1F1(1;b;z)=11+zb+z(b+1)+bz(b+2)+2z(b+3)+(b+1)z(b+4)+

The series 2F1

The final case involves

2F1(a,b;c;z)=1+abc1!z+a(a+1)b(b+1)c(c+1)2!z2+a(a+1)(a+2)b(b+1)(b+2)c(c+1)(c+2)3!z3+.

Again, two identities are used alternately.

2F1(a,b;c1;z)2F1(a+1,b;c;z)=(ac+1)bzc(c1)2F1(a+1,b+1;c+1;z),
2F1(a,b;c1;z)2F1(a,b+1;c;z)=(bc+1)azc(c1)2F1(a+1,b+1;c+1;z).

These are essentially the same identity with a and b interchanged.

Let

f0(z)=2F1(a,b;c;z),
f1(z)=2F1(a+1,b;c+1;z),
f2(z)=2F1(a+1,b+1;c+2;z),
f3(z)=2F1(a+2,b+1;c+3;z),
f4(z)=2F1(a+2,b+2;c+4;z),

etc.

This gives fi1fi=kizfi+1 where k1=(ac)bc(c+1),k2=(bc1)(a+1)(c+1)(c+2),k3=(ac1)(b+1)(c+2)(c+3),k4=(bc2)(a+2)(c+3)(c+4), producing[6]

2F1(a+1,b;c+1;z)2F1(a,b;c;z)=11+(ac)bc(c+1)z1+(bc1)(a+1)(c+1)(c+2)z1+(ac1)(b+1)(c+2)(c+3)z1+(bc2)(a+2)(c+3)(c+4)z1+

or

2F1(a+1,b;c+1;z)c2F1(a,b;c;z)=1c+(ac)bz(c+1)+(bc1)(a+1)z(c+2)+(ac1)(b+1)z(c+3)+(bc2)(a+2)z(c+4)+

Since 2F1(0,b;c;z)=1, setting a to 0 and replacing c + 1 with c gives a simplified special case of the continued fraction:

2F1(1,b;c;z)=11+bzc+(bc)z(c+1)+c(b+1)z(c+2)+2(bc1)z(c+3)+(c+1)(b+2)z(c+4)+

Convergence properties

In this section, the cases where one or more of the parameters is a negative integer are excluded, since in these cases either the hypergeometric series are undefined or that they are polynomials so the continued fraction terminates. Other trivial exceptions are excluded as well.

In the cases 0F1 and 1F1, the series converge everywhere so the fraction on the left hand side is a meromorphic function. The continued fractions on the right hand side will converge uniformly on any closed and bounded set that contains no poles of this function.[7]

In the case 2F1, the radius of convergence of the series is 1 and the fraction on the left hand side is a meromorphic function within this circle. The continued fractions on the right hand side will converge to the function everywhere inside this circle.

Outside the circle, the continued fraction represents the analytic continuation of the function to the complex plane with the positive real axis, from Template:Math to the point at infinity removed. In most cases Template:Math is a branch point and the line from Template:Math to positive infinity is a branch cut for this function. The continued fraction converges to a meromorphic function on this domain, and it converges uniformly on any closed and bounded subset of this domain that does not contain any poles.[8]

Applications

The series 0F1

We have

cosh(z)=0F1(12;z24),
sinh(z)=z0F1(32;z24),

so

tanh(z)=z0F1(32;z24)0F1(12;z24)=z/212+z2432+z2452+z2472+=z1+z23+z25+z27+.

This particular expansion is known as Lambert's continued fraction and dates back to 1768.[9]

It easily follows that

tan(z)=z1z23z25z27.

The expansion of tanh can be used to prove that en is irrational for every non-zero integer n (which is alas not enough to prove that e is transcendental). The expansion of tan was used by both Lambert and Legendre to prove that π is irrational.

The Bessel function Jν can be written

Jν(z)=(12z)νΓ(ν+1)0F1(ν+1;z24),

from which it follows

Jν(z)Jν1(z)=z2νz22(ν+1)z22(ν+2)z22(ν+3).

These formulas are also valid for every complex z.

The series 1F1

Since ez=1F1(1;1;z), 1/ez=ez

ez=11+z1+z2+z3+2z4+2z5+
ez=1+z1+z2+z3+2z4+2z5+.

With some manipulation, this can be used to prove the simple continued fraction representation of e,

e=2+11+12+11+11+14+

The error function erf (z), given by

erf(z)=2π0zet2dt,

can also be computed in terms of Kummer's hypergeometric function:

erf(z)=2zπez21F1(1;32;z2).

By applying the continued fraction of Gauss, a useful expansion valid for every complex number z can be obtained:[10]

π2ez2erf(z)=z1z232+z25232z272+2z29252z2112+3z213272z2152+.

A similar argument can be made to derive continued fraction expansions for the Fresnel integrals, for the Dawson function, and for the incomplete gamma function. A simpler version of the argument yields two useful continued fraction expansions of the exponential function.[11]

The series 2F1

From

(1z)b=1F0(b;;z)=2F1(1,b;1;z),
(1z)b=11+bz1+(b1)z2+(b+1)z3+2(b2)z4+

It is easily shown[12] that the Taylor series expansion of arctan z in a neighborhood of zero is given by

arctanz=zF(12,1;32;z2).

The continued fraction of Gauss can be applied to this identity, yielding the expansion

arctanz=z1+(1z)23+(2z)25+(3z)27+(4z)29+,

which converges to the principal branch of the inverse tangent function on the cut complex plane, with the cut extending along the imaginary axis from i to the point at infinity, and from −i to the point at infinity.[13]

This particular continued fraction converges fairly quickly when z = 1, giving the value π/4 to seven decimal places by the ninth convergent. The corresponding series

π4=11+122+322+522+=113+1517±

converges much more slowly, with more than a million terms needed to yield seven decimal places of accuracy.[14]

Variations of this argument can be used to produce continued fraction expansions for the natural logarithm, the arcsin function, and the generalized binomial series.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

  1. Jones & Thron (1980) p. 5
  2. C. F. Gauss (1813), Werke, vol. 3 pp. 134–38.
  3. B. Riemann (1863), "Sullo svolgimento del quoziente di due serie ipergeometriche in frazione continua infinita" in Werke. pp. 400–406. (Posthumous fragment).
  4. L. W. Thomé (1867), "Über die Kettenbruchentwicklung des Gauß'schen Quotienten ...," Jour. für Math. vol. 67 pp. 299–309.
  5. E. B. Van Vleck (1901), "On the convergence of the continued fraction of Gauss and other continued fractions." Annals of Mathematics, vol. 3 pp. 1–18.
  6. Template:Cite journal
  7. Jones & Thron (1980) p. 206
  8. Wall, 1973 (p. 339)
  9. Wall (1973) p. 349.
  10. Jones & Thron (1980) p. 208.
  11. See the example in the article Padé table for the expansions of ez as continued fractions of Gauss.
  12. ProofWiki
  13. Wall (1973) p. 343. Notice that i and −i are branch points for the inverse tangent function.
  14. Jones & Thron (1980) p. 202.