Fully irreducible automorphism

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In the mathematical subject geometric group theory, a fully irreducible automorphism of the free group Fn is an element of Out(Fn) which has no periodic conjugacy classes of proper free factors in Fn (where n > 1). Fully irreducible automorphisms are also referred to as "irreducible with irreducible powers" or "iwip" automorphisms. The notion of being fully irreducible provides a key Out(Fn) counterpart of the notion of a pseudo-Anosov element of the mapping class group of a finite type surface. Fully irreducibles play an important role in the study of structural properties of individual elements and of subgroups of Out(Fn).

Formal definition

Let φ∈Out⁡(Fn) where n≥2. Then φ is called fully irreducible[1] if there does not exist an integer p≠0 and a proper free factor A of Fn such that φp([A])=[A], where [A] is the conjugacy class of A in Fn. Equivalently, for all p>0 and any proper free factor A of Fn, φp([A])≠[A]. Here saying that A is a proper free factor of Fn means that A≠1 and there exists a subgroup B≤Fn,B≠1 such that Fn=A∗B.

Also, Φ∈Aut⁡(Fn) is called fully irreducible if the outer automorphism class φ∈Out⁡(Fn) of Φ is fully irreducible.

Two fully irreducibles φ,ψ∈Out⁡(Fn) are called independent if ⟨φ⟩∩⟨ψ⟩={1}.

Relationship to irreducible automorphisms

The notion of being fully irreducible grew out of an older notion of an "irreducible" outer automorphism of Fn originally introduced in.[2] An element φ∈Out⁡(Fn), where n≥2, is called irreducible if there does not exist a free product decomposition

Fn=A1∗…∗Ak∗C

with k≥1, and with Ai≠1,i=1,…k being proper free factors of Fn, such that φ permutes the conjugacy classes [A1],…,[Ak].

Then φ∈Out⁡(Fn) is fully irreducible in the sense of the definition above if and only if for every p≠0 φp is irreducible.

It is known that for any atoroidal φ∈Out⁡(Fn) (that is, without periodic conjugacy classes of nontrivial elements of Fn), being irreducible is equivalent to being fully irreducible.[3] For non-atoroidal automorphisms, Bestvina and Handel[2] produce an example of an irreducible but not fully irreducible element of Out⁡(Fn), induced by a suitably chosen pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism of a surface with more than one boundary component.

Properties

  • If φ∈Out⁡(Fn) and p≠0 then φ is fully irreducible if and only if φp is fully irreducible.
  • Every fully irreducible φ∈Out⁡(Fn) can be represented by an expanding irreducible train track map.[2]
  • Every fully irreducible φ∈Out⁡(Fn) has exponential growth in Fn given by a stretch factor λ=λ(φ)>1. This stretch factor has the property that for every free basis X of Fn (and, more generally, for every point of the Culler–Vogtmann Outer space X∈cvn) and for every 1≠g∈Fn one has:
limk→∞‖φk(g)‖Xk=λ.

Moreover, λ=λ(φ) is equal to the Perron–Frobenius eigenvalue of the transition matrix of any train track representative of φ.[2][4]

  • Unlike for stretch factors of pseudo-Anosov surface homeomorphisms, it can happen that for a fully irreducible φ∈Out⁡(Fn) one has λ(φ)≠λ(φ−1)[5] and this behavior is believed to be generic. However, Handel and Mosher[6] proved that for every n≥2 there exists a finite constant 0<Cn<∞ such that for every fully irreducible φ∈Out⁡(Fn)
log⁡λ(φ)log⁡λ(φ−1)≤Cn.
  • A fully irreducible φ∈Out⁡(Fn) is non-atoroidal, that is, has a periodic conjugacy class of a nontrivial element of Fn, if and only if φ is induced by a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism of a compact connected surface with one boundary component and with the fundamental group isomorphic to Fn.[2]
  • A fully irreducible element φ∈Out⁡(Fn) has exactly two fixed points in the Thurston compactification CV‾n of the projectivized Outer space CVn, and φ∈Out⁡(Fn) acts on CV‾n with "North-South" dynamics.[7]
  • For a fully irreducible element φ∈Out⁡(Fn), its fixed points in CV‾n are projectivized ℝ-trees [T+(φ)],[T−(φ)], where T+(φ),T−(φ)∈cv‾n, satisfying the property that T+(φ)φ=λ(φ)T+(φ) and T−(φ)φ−1=λ(φ−1)T−(φ).[8]
  • A fully irreducible element φ∈Out⁡(Fn) acts on the space of projectivized geodesic currents ℙCurr(Fn) with either "North-South" or "generalized North-South" dynamics, depending on whether φ is atoroidal or non-atoroidal.[9][10]
  • If φ∈Out⁡(Fn) is fully irreducible, then the commensurator Comm(⟨φ⟩)≤Out⁡(Fn) is virtually cyclic.[11] In particular, the centralizer and the normalizer of ⟨φ⟩ in Out⁡(Fn) are virtually cyclic.
  • If φ,ψ∈Out⁡(Fn) are independent fully irreducibles, then [T±(φ)],[T±(ψ)]∈CV‾n are four distinct points, and there exists M≥1 such that for every p,q≥M the subgroup ⟨φp,ψq⟩≤Out⁡(Fn) is isomorphic to F2.[8]
  • If φ∈Out⁡(Fn) is fully irreducible and φ∈H≤Out⁡(Fn), then either H is virtually cyclic or H contains a subgroup isomorphic to F2.[8] [This statement provides a strong form of the Tits alternative for subgroups of Out⁡(Fn) containing fully irreducibles.]
  • If H≤Out⁡(Fn) is an arbitrary subgroup, then either H contains a fully irreducible element, or there exist a finite index subgroup H0≤H and a proper free factor A of Fn such that H0[A]=[A].[12]
  • An element φ∈Out⁡(Fn) acts as a loxodromic isometry on the free factor complex ℱℱn if and only if φ is fully irreducible.[13]
  • It is known that "random" (in the sense of random walks) elements of Out⁡(Fn) are fully irreducible. More precisely, if μ is a measure on Out⁡(Fn) whose support generates a semigroup in Out⁡(Fn) containing some two independent fully irreducibles. Then for the random walk of length k on Out⁡(Fn) determined by μ, the probability that we obtain a fully irreducible element converges to 1 as k→∞.[14]
  • A fully irreducible element φ∈Out⁡(Fn) admits a (generally non-unique) periodic axis in the volume-one normalized Outer space Xn, which is geodesic with respect to the asymmetric Lipschitz metric on Xn and possesses strong "contraction"-type properties.[15] A related object, defined for an atoroidal fully irreducible φ∈Out⁡(Fn), is the axis bundle Aφ⊆Xn, which is a certain φ-invariant closed subset proper homotopy equivalent to a line.[16]

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  1. ↑ Thierry Coulbois and Arnaud Hilion, Botany of irreducible automorphisms of free groups, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 256 (2012), 291–307
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Mladen Bestvina, and Michael Handel, Train tracks and automorphisms of free groups. Annals of Mathematics (2), vol. 135 (1992), no. 1, pp. 1–51
  3. ↑ Ilya Kapovich, Algorithmic detectability of iwip automorphisms. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 46 (2014), no. 2, 279–290.
  4. ↑ Oleg Bogopolski. Introduction to group theory. EMS Textbooks in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2008. Template:ISBN
  5. ↑ Michael Handel, and Lee Mosher, Parageometric outer automorphisms of free groups. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 359 (2007), no. 7, 3153–3183
  6. ↑ Michael Handel, Lee Mosher, The expansion factors of an outer automorphism and its inverse. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 359 (2007), no. 7, 3185–3208
  7. ↑ Template:Citation
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Mladen Bestvina, Mark Feighn and Michael Handel, Laminations, trees, and irreducible automorphisms of free groups. Geometric and Functional Analysis 7 (1997), 215–244.
  9. ↑ Caglar Uyanik, Dynamics of hyperbolic iwips. Conformal Geometry and Dynamics 18 (2014), 192–216.
  10. ↑ Caglar Uyanik, Generalized north-south dynamics on the space of geodesic currents. Geometriae Dedicata 177 (2015), 129–148.
  11. ↑ Ilya Kapovich, and Martin Lustig, Stabilizers of ℝ-trees with free isometric actions of FN. Journal of Group Theory 14 (2011), no. 5, 673–694.
  12. ↑ Camille Horbez, A short proof of Handel and Mosher's alternative for subgroups of Out(FN). Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics 10 (2016), no. 2, 709–721.
  13. ↑ Mladen Bestvina, and Mark Feighn, Hyperbolicity of the complex of free factors. Advances in Mathematics 256 (2014), 104–155.
  14. ↑ Joseph Maher and Giulio Tiozzo, Random walks on weakly hyperbolic groups, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Ahead of print (Jan 2016); cf. Theorem 1.4
  15. ↑ Yael Algom-Kfir, Strongly contracting geodesics in outer space. Geometry & Topology 15 (2011), no. 4, 2181–2233.
  16. ↑ Michael Handel, and Lee Mosher, Axes in outer space. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 213 (2011), no. 1004; Template:ISBN.