Fibration of simplicial sets

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, especially in homotopy theory, a left fibration of simplicial sets is a map that has the right lifting property with respect to the horn inclusions Λin⊂Δn,0≤i<n.Template:Sfn A right fibration is defined similarly with the condition 0<i≤n.Template:Sfn A Kan fibration is one with the right lifting property with respect to every horn inclusion; hence, a Kan fibration is exactly a map that is both a left and right fibration.[1]

Examples

A right fibration is a cartesian fibration such that each fiber is a Kan complex.

In particular, a category fibered in groupoids over another category is a special case of a right fibration of simplicial sets in the ∞-category setup.

Anodyne extensions

A left anodyne extension is a map in the saturation of the set of the horn inclusions Λkn→Δn for n≥1,0≤k<n in the category of simplicial sets, where the saturation of a class is the smallest class that contains the class and is stable under pushouts, retracts and transfinite compositions (compositions of infinitely many maps).[2] A right anodyne extension is defined by replacing the condition 0≤k<n with 0<k≤n. The notions are originally due to Gabriel–Zisman and are used to study fibrations for simplicial sets.

A left (or right) anodyne extension is a monomorphism (since the class of monomorphisms is saturated,[3] the saturation lies in the class of monomorphisms).

Given a class F of maps, let r(F) denote the class of maps satisfying the right lifting property with respect to F. Then r(F)=r(F‾) for the saturation F‾ of F.[4] Thus, a map is a left (resp. right) fibration if and only if it has the right lifting property with respect to left (resp. right) anodyne extensions.[2]

An inner anodyne extension is a map in the saturation of the horn inclusions Λkn→Δn for n≥1,0<k<n.Template:Sfn The maps having the right lifting property with respect to inner anodyne extensions or equivalently with respect to the horn inclusions Λkn→Δn,n≥1,0<k<n are called inner fibrations.Template:Sfn Simplicial sets are then weak Kan complexes (∞-categories) if unique maps to the final object are inner fibrations.

An isofibration p:X→Y is an inner fibration such that for each object (0-simplex) x0 in X and an invertible map g:y0→y1 with p(x0)=y0 in Y, there exists a map f in X such that p(f)=g.Template:Sfn For example, a left (or right) fibration between weak Kan complexes is a conservative isofibration.Template:Sfn

Theorem of Gabriel and Zisman

Given monomorphisms i:A→B and k:Y→Z, let i⊔A×Yk denote the pushout of i×idY and idA×k. Then a theorem of Gabriel and Zisman says:Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn if i is a left (resp. right) anodyne extension, then the induced map

i⊔A×Yk→B×Z

is a left (resp. right) anodyne extension. Similarly, if i is an inner anodyne extension, then the above induced map is an inner anodyne extension.Template:Sfn

A special case of the above is the covering homotopy extension property:Template:Sfn a Kan fibration has the right lifting property with respect to (Y×I)⊔(Z×0)→Z×I for monomorphisms Y→Z and 0→I=Δ1.

As a corollary of the theorem, a map p:X→Y is an inner fibration if and only if for each monomorphism i:A→B, the induced map

(i∗,p∗):Hom_(B,X)→Hom_(A,X)×Hom_(A,Y)Hom_(B,Y)

is an inner fibration.Template:Sfn[5] Similarly, if p is a left (resp. right) fibration, then (i∗,p∗) is a left (resp. right) fibration.Template:Sfn

Model category structure

Template:Main The category of simplicial sets sSet has the standard model category structure where Template:Sfn

  • The cofibrations are the monomorphisms,
  • The fibrations are the Kan fibrations,
  • The weak equivalences are the maps f such that f∗ is bijective on simplicial homotopy classes for each Kan complex (fibrant object),
  • A fibration is trivial (i.e., has the right lifting property with respect to monomorphisms) if and only if it is a weak equivalence,
  • A cofibration is an anodyne extension if and only if it is a weak equivalence.

Because of the last property, an anodyne extension is also known as an acyclic cofibration (a cofibration that is a weak equivalence). Also, the weak equivalences between Kan complexes are the same as the simplicial homotopy equivalences between them.

Under the geometric realization | - | : sSet → Top, we have:

Universal left fibration

Let U be the simplicial set where each n-simplex consists of

  • a map p:X→Δn from a (small) simplicial set X,
  • a section s of p,
  • for each integer m≥0 and for each map f:Δm→Δn, a choice of a pullback of p along f.[6]

Now, a conjecture of Nichols-Barrer which is now a theorem says that U is the same thing as the ∞-category of ∞-groupoids (Kan complexes) together with some choices.[7] In particular, there is a forgetful map

puniv:U→𝐊𝐚𝐧 = the ∞-category of Kan complexes,

which is a left fibration. It is universal in the following sense: for each simplicial set X, there is a natural bijection

[X,𝐊𝐚𝐧]→∼ the set of the isomorphism classes of left fibrations over X

given by pulling-back puniv, where [,] means the simplicial homotopy classes of maps.[8] In short, 𝐊𝐚𝐧 is the classifying space of left fibrations. Given a left fibration over X, a map X→𝐊𝐚𝐧 corresponding to it is called the classifying map for that fibration.

In Cisinski's book, the hom-functor Hom⁡:Cop×C→𝐊𝐚𝐧 on an ∞-category C is then simply defined to be the classifying map for the left fibration

(s,t):S(C)→Cop×C

where each n-simplex in S(C) is a map (Δn)op∗Δn→C.[9] In fact, S(C) is an ∞-category called the twisted diagonal of C.[10]

In his Higher Topos Theory, Lurie constructs an analogous universal cartesian fibration.[11]

See also

Footnotes

Template:Reflist

References

Further reading

  1. ↑ Template:Cite arXiv
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Template:Harvnb
  3. ↑ Proof: Let l(F) = the class of maps having the left lifting property with respect to a class F of maps. Then l(F) can be shown to be saturated. By the axiom of choice, if F is the class of surjective maps, then l(F) is the class of injective maps. This implies the same is true for monomorphisms between preshaves.
  4. ↑ Proof: Since l(G), l for the left lifting property, is saturated and F⊂l(r(F)), we have: F‾⊂l(r(F)) and so r(F)=r(l(r(F))⊂r(F‾)⊂r(F).
  5. ↑ Proposition 4.1.4.1. in https://kerodon.net/tag/01BS
  6. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  7. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  8. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  9. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  10. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  11. ↑ Template:Harvnb