Equal temperament
Template:Short description Template:About Template:Use dmy dates

Equal temperamentTemplate:Efn is a musical temperament (tuning system) that divides the octave into 12 identical parts. It is a logarithmic scale with a ratio equal to the 12th root of 2 ( ≈ 1.05946). The scale unit is known as a semitone or half step.
Twelve-tone equal temperament (12 TET) is the most widespread system in music today. It has been the predominant tuning system of Western music, starting with classical music, since the 18th century. It has also been used in other cultures.
In modern times, equal temperament is usually tuned relative to a standard pitch of 440 Hz. Over the past few centuries, standard pitch has risen significantly.Template:Sfn
Comparison with just intonation
The intervals of 12 Template:Sc closely approximate some intervals in just intonation.[1] The fifths and fourths are almost indistinguishably close to just intervals, while thirds and sixths are further away.
In the following table, the sizes of various just intervals are compared to their equal-tempered counterparts, given as a ratio as well as cents. Template:Clear
Interval Name Equal temperament interval Cents in equal temperament Just intonation interval Cents in just intonation Tuning error Unison 2Template:Sup = 1 0 Template:Sfrac = 1 0.00 0.00 Minor second 2Template:Sup 100 Template:Sfrac 111.73 −11.73 Major second 2Template:Sup 200 Template:Sfrac 203.91 −3.91 Minor third 2Template:Sup 300 Template:Sfrac 315.64 −15.64 Major third 2Template:Sup 400 Template:Sfrac 386.31 +13.69 Perfect fourth 2Template:Sup 500 Template:Sfrac 498.04 +1.96 Tritone 2Template:Sup 600 Template:Sfrac 590.22 +9.78 Perfect fifth 2Template:Sup 700 Template:Sfrac 701.96 −1.96 Minor sixth 2Template:Sup 800 Template:Sfrac 813.69 −13.69 Major sixth 2Template:Sup 900 Template:Sfrac 884.36 +15.64 Minor seventh 2Template:Sup 1000 Template:Sfrac 1017.60 −17.60 Major seventh 2Template:Sup 1100 Template:Sfrac 1088.27 +11.73 Octave 2Template:Sup = 2 1200 Template:Sfrac = 2 1200.00 0.00
History
The two figures frequently credited with the achievement of exact calculation of twelve-tone equal temperament are Zhu Zaiyu (also romanized as Chu-Tsaiyu, Template:Lang-zh) in 1584 and Simon Stevin in 1585. According to Fritz A. Kuttner, a critic of the theory,Template:Sfn it is known that "Chu-Tsaiyu presented a highly precise, simple and ingenious method for arithmetic calculation of equal temperament mono-chords in 1584" and that "Simon Stevin offered a mathematical definition of equal temperament plus a somewhat less precise computation of the corresponding numerical values in 1585 or later." The developments occurred independently.Template:Sfn
Kenneth Robinson attributes the invention of equal temperament to Zhu ZaiyuTemplate:Sfn and provides textual quotations as evidence.Template:Sfn Zhu Zaiyu is quoted as saying that, in a text dating from 1584, "I have founded a new system. I establish one foot as the number from which the others are to be extracted, and using proportions I extract them. Altogether one has to find the exact figures for the pitch-pipers in twelve operations."Template:Sfn Kuttner disagrees and remarks that his claim "cannot be considered correct without major qualifications."Template:Sfn Kuttner proposes that neither Zhu Zaiyu or Simon Stevin achieved equal temperament and that neither of the two should be treated as inventors.Template:Sfn
China
Early history
A complete set of bronze chime bells, among many musical instruments found in the tomb of the Marquis Yi of Zeng (early Warring States, Template:Circa in the Chinese Bronze Age), covers five full 7-note octaves in the key of C Major, including 12 note semi-tones in the middle of the range.Template:Sfn
An approximation for equal temperament was described by Template:Ill, a mathematician of the Southern and Northern Dynasties who lived from 370 to 447.[2] He came out with the earliest recorded approximate numerical sequence in relation to equal temperament in history: 900 849 802 758 715 677 638 601 570 536 509.5 479 450.Template:ClarifyTemplate:Sfn
Zhu Zaiyu

Zhu Zaiyu (Template:Lang), a prince of the Ming court, spent thirty years on research based on the equal temperament idea originally postulated by his father. He described his new pitch theory in his Fusion of Music and Calendar Template:Lang published in 1580. This was followed by the publication of a precise numerical specification for equal temperament in his 5,000-page work Complete Compendium of Music and Pitch (Yuelü quan shu Template:Lang) in 1584.Template:Sfn An extended account is also given by Joseph Needham.Template:Sfn Zhu obtained his result mathematically by dividing the length of string and pipe successively by Template:Radic ≈ 1.059463, and for pipe length by Template:Radic,Template:Sfn such that after twelve divisions (an octave) the length was divided by a factor of 2:
Similarly, after 84 divisions (7 octaves) the length was divided by a factor of 128:
Zhu Zaiyu has been credited as the first person to solve the equal temperament problem mathematically.Template:Sfn At least one researcher has proposed that Matteo Ricci, a Jesuit in China recorded this work in his personal journalTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn and may have transmitted the work back to Europe. (Standard resources on the topic make no mention of any such transfer.Template:Sfn) In 1620, Zhu's work was referenced by a European mathematician.Template:WhoTemplate:Sfn Murray Barbour said, "The first known appearance in print of the correct figures for equal temperament was in China, where Prince Tsaiyü's brilliant solution remains an enigma."Template:Sfn The 19th-century German physicist Hermann von Helmholtz wrote in On the Sensations of Tone that a Chinese prince (see below) introduced a scale of seven notes, and that the division of the octave into twelve semitones was discovered in China.Template:Sfn

Zhu Zaiyu illustrated his equal temperament theory by the construction of a set of 36 bamboo tuning pipes ranging in 3 octaves, with instructions of the type of bamboo, color of paint, and detailed specification on their length and inner and outer diameters. He also constructed a 12-string tuning instrument, with a set of tuning pitch pipes hidden inside its bottom cavity. In 1890, Victor-Charles Mahillon, curator of the Conservatoire museum in Brussels, duplicated a set of pitch pipes according to Zhu Zaiyu's specification. He said that the Chinese theory of tones knew more about the length of pitch pipes than its Western counterpart, and that the set of pipes duplicated according to the Zaiyu data proved the accuracy of this theory.
Europe

Early history
One of the earliest discussions of equal temperament occurs in the writing of Aristoxenus in the 4th century BC.Template:Sfn
Vincenzo Galilei (father of Galileo Galilei) was one of the first practical advocates of twelve-tone equal temperament. He composed a set of dance suites on each of the 12 notes of the chromatic scale in all the "transposition keys", and published also, in his 1584 "Fronimo", 24 + 1 ricercars.Template:Sfn He used the 18:17 ratio for fretting the lute (although some adjustment was necessary for pure octaves).Template:Sfn
Galilei's countryman and fellow lutenist Giacomo Gorzanis had written music based on equal temperament by 1567.Template:Sfn Gorzanis was not the only lutenist to explore all modes or keys: Francesco Spinacino wrote a Template:Lang (Ricercar in all the Tones) as early as 1507.[3] In the 17th century lutenist-composer John Wilson wrote a set of 30 preludes including 24 in all the major/minor keys.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Henricus Grammateus drew a close approximation to equal temperament in 1518. The first tuning rules in equal temperament were given by Giovani Maria Lanfranco in his "Scintille de musica".[4] Zarlino in his polemic with Galilei initially opposed equal temperament but eventually conceded to it in relation to the lute in his Template:Lang in 1588.
Simon Stevin
The first mention of equal temperament related to the twelfth root of two in the West appeared in Simon Stevin's manuscript Template:Lang (c. 1605), published posthumously nearly three centuries later in 1884.Template:Sfn However, due to insufficient accuracy of his calculation, many of the chord length numbers he obtained were off by one or two units from the correct values.Template:Sfn As a result, the frequency ratios of Simon Stevin's chords has no unified ratio, but one ratio per tone, which is claimed by Gene Cho as incorrect.Template:Sfn
The following were Simon Stevin's chord length from Template:Lang:Template:Sfn
| Tone | Chord 10000 from Simon Stevin | Ratio | Corrected chord |
|---|---|---|---|
| semitone | 9438 | 1.0595465 | 9438.7 |
| whole tone | 8909 | 1.0593781 | |
| tone and a half | 8404 | 1.0600904 | 8409 |
| ditone | 7936 | 1.0594758 | 7937 |
| ditone and a half | 7491 | 1.0594046 | 7491.5 |
| tritone | 7071 | 1.0593975 | 7071.1 |
| tritone and a half | 6674 | 1.0594845 | 6674.2 |
| four-tone | 6298 | 1.0597014 | 6299 |
| four-tone and a half | 5944 | 1.0595558 | 5946 |
| five-tone | 5611 | 1.0593477 | 5612.3 |
| five-tone and a half | 5296 | 1.0594788 | 5297.2 |
| full tone | 1.0592000 |
A generation later, French mathematician Marin Mersenne presented several equal tempered chord lengths obtained by Jean Beaugrand, Ismael Bouillaud, and Jean Galle.Template:Sfn
In 1630 Johann Faulhaber published a 100-cent monochord table, which contained several errors due to his use of logarithmic tables. He did not explain how he obtained his results.Template:Sfn
Baroque era
From 1450 to about 1800, plucked instrument players (lutenists and guitarists) generally favored equal temperament,[5] and the Brossard lute manuscript compiled in the last quarter of the 17th century contains a series of 18 preludes attributed to Bocquet written in all keys, including the last prelude, entitled Template:Lang, which enharmonically modulates through all keys.[6]Template:Huh? Angelo Michele Bartolotti published a series of passacaglias in all keys, with connecting enharmonically modulating passages. Among the 17th-century keyboard composers Girolamo Frescobaldi advocated equal temperament. Some theorists, such as Giuseppe Tartini, were opposed to the adoption of equal temperament; they felt that degrading the purity of each chord degraded the aesthetic appeal of music, although Andreas Werckmeister emphatically advocated equal temperament in his 1707 treatise published posthumously.[7]
Twelve-tone equal temperament took hold for a variety of reasons. It was a convenient fit for the existing keyboard design, and permitted total harmonic freedom with the burden of moderate impurity in every interval, particularly imperfect consonances. This allowed greater expression through enharmonic modulation, which became extremely important in the 18th century in music of such composers as Francesco Geminiani, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, Carl Philipp Emmanuel Bach, and Johann Gottfried Müthel.Template:Citation needed Twelve-tone equal temperament did have some disadvantages, such as imperfect thirds, but as Europe switched to equal temperament, it changed the music that it wrote in order to accommodate the system and minimize dissonance.Template:Fact
A precise equal temperament is possible using the 17th century Sabbatini method of splitting the octave first into three tempered major thirds.Template:Sfn This was also proposed by several writers during the Classical era. Tuning without beat rates but employing several checks, achieving virtually modern accuracy, was already done in the first decades of the 19th century.Template:Sfn Using beat rates, first proposed in 1749, became common after their diffusion by Helmholtz and Ellis in the second half of the 19th century.Template:Sfn The ultimate precision was available with 2 decimal tables published by White in 1917.[8] The intervals of equal temperament closely approximate some intervals in just intonation.[1]
Comparison of historical approximations of the semitone
| Year | Name | RatioTemplate:Sfn | Cents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400 | He Chengtian | 1.060070671 | 100.99 |
| 1580 | Vincenzo Galilei | 18:17 [1.058823529] | 98.95 |
| 1581 | Zhu Zaiyu | 1.059463094 | 100.00 |
| 1585 | Simon Stevin | 1.059546514 | 100.14 |
| 1630 | Marin Mersenne | 1.059322034 | 99.76 |
| 1630 | Johann Faulhaber | 1.059490385 | 100.04 |
Varieties of equal temperament

Other equal temperaments divide the octave differently. For example, some music has been written in [[19 equal temperament|Template:Nobr]] and [[31 equal temperament|Template:Nobr]], while the Arab tone system uses [[24-TET|Template:Nobr]].
Instead of dividing an octave, an equal temperament can also divide a different interval, like the equal-tempered version of the Bohlen–Pierce scale, which divides the just interval of an octave and a fifth (ratio 3:1), called a "tritave" or a "pseudo-octave" in that system, into 13 equal parts.
Similar tuning systems
Chinese musicians developed 3-limit just intonation at least a century before He Chengtian.Template:Sfn Likewise, Pythagorean tuning, which was developed by ancient Greeks, was the predominant system in Europe until during the Renaissance, when Europeans realized that dissonant intervals such as Template:Frac could be made more consonant by tempering them to simpler ratios like Template:Frac, resulting in Europe developing a series of meantone temperaments.Template:Sfn
See also
- Diatonic and chromatic
- Electronic tuner
- Just intonation
- List of meantone intervals
- Microtonal music
- Music and mathematics
- Musical acoustics (the physics of music)
- Musical tuning
References
Footnotes
Citations
Sources
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Citation
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite web
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite web
Further reading
- Duffin, Ross W. How Equal Temperament Ruined Harmony (and Why You Should Care). W.W. Norton & Company, 2007.
- Jorgensen, Owen. Tuning. Michigan State University Press, 1991. Template:ISBN
- Khramov, Mykhaylo. "Approximation of 5-limit just intonation. Computer MIDI Modeling in Negative Systems of Equal Divisions of the Octave", Proceedings of the International Conference SIGMAP-2008Template:Dead link, 26–29 July 2008, Porto, pp. 181–184, Template:ISBN
- Template:Cite book
- Surjodiningrat, W., Sudarjana, P.J., and Susanto, A. (1972) Tone measurements of outstanding Javanese gamelans in Jogjakarta and Surakarta, Gadjah Mada University Press, Jogjakarta 1972. Cited on https://web.archive.org/web/20050127000731/http://web.telia.com/~u57011259/pelog_main.htm. Retrieved May 19, 2006.
- Stewart, P. J. (2006) "From Galaxy to Galaxy: Music of the Spheres" [1]
- Sensations of Tone a foundational work on acoustics and the perception of sound by Hermann von Helmholtz. Especially Appendix XX: Additions by the translator, pp. 430–556, (pdf pp. 451–577)]
External links
- Xenharmonic wiki on EDOs vs. Equal Temperaments
- Huygens-Fokker Foundation Centre for Microtonal Music
- A.Orlandini: Music Acoustics
- "Temperament" from A supplement to Mr. Chambers's cyclopædia (1753)
- Barbieri, Patrizio. Enharmonic instruments and music, 1470–1900 Template:Webarchive. (2008) Latina, Il Levante Libreria Editrice
- Fractal Microtonal Music, Jim Kukula.
- All existing 18th century quotes on J.S. Bach and temperament
- Dominic Eckersley: "Rosetta Revisited: Bach's Very Ordinary Temperament"
- Well Temperaments, based on the Werckmeister Definition
- "Favored Cardinalities of Scales" by Peter Buch
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Template:Harvnb
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs named "appstate.edu". - ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs named "Scintille". - ↑ Lindley, Mark. Lutes, Viols, Temperaments. Template:ISBN
- ↑ Vm7 6214
- ↑ Andreas Werckmeister (1707), Template:Lang
- ↑ Template:Cite book