Double pendulum

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Accessibility dispute Template:Short descriptionTemplate:More footnotes

A double pendulum consists of two pendulums attached end to end.

In physics and mathematics, in the area of dynamical systems, a double pendulum, also known as a chaotic pendulum, is a pendulum with another pendulum attached to its end, forming a simple physical system that exhibits rich dynamic behavior with a strong sensitivity to initial conditions.[1] The motion of a double pendulum is governed by a pair of coupled ordinary differential equations and is chaotic.

Analysis and interpretation

Several variants of the double pendulum may be considered; the two limbs may be of equal or unequal lengths and masses, they may be simple pendulums or compound pendulums (also called complex pendulums) and the motion may be in three dimensions or restricted to the vertical plane. In the following analysis, the limbs are taken to be identical compound pendulums of length Template:Mvar and mass Template:Mvar, and the motion is restricted to two dimensions.

Double compound pendulum
Motion of the double compound pendulum (from numerical integration of the equations of motion)

In a compound pendulum, the mass is distributed along its length. If the double pendulum mass is evenly distributed, then the center of mass of each limb is at its midpoint, and the limb has a moment of inertia of Template:Math about that point.

It is convenient to use the angles between each limb and the vertical as the generalized coordinates defining the configuration of the system. These angles are denoted Template:Math and Template:Math. The position of the center of mass of each rod may be written in terms of these two coordinates. If the origin of the Cartesian coordinate system is taken to be at the point of suspension of the first pendulum, then the center of mass of this pendulum is at:x1=12sinθ1y1=12cosθ1

and the center of mass of the second pendulum is at x2=(sinθ1+12sinθ2)y2=(cosθ1+12cosθ2) This is enough information to write out the Lagrangian.

Lagrangian

The Lagrangian is given by L=kinetic energypotential energy=12m(v12+v22)+12I(θ˙12+θ˙22)mg(y1+y2)=12m(x˙12+y˙12+x˙22+y˙22)+12I(θ˙12+θ˙22)mg(y1+y2) The first term is the linear kinetic energy of the center of mass of the bodies and the second term is the rotational kinetic energy around the center of mass of each rod. The last term is the potential energy of the bodies in a uniform gravitational field. The dot-notation indicates the time derivative of the variable in question.

Using the values of x1 and y1 defined above, we have x˙1=θ˙1(12cosθ1)y˙1=θ˙1(12sinθ1) which leads to v12=x˙12+y˙12=14θ˙122(cos2θ1+sin2θ1)=142θ˙12.

Similarly, for x2 and y2 we have x˙2=(θ˙1cosθ1+12θ˙2cosθ2)y˙2=(θ˙1sinθ1+12θ˙2sinθ2)

and therefore

v22=x˙22+y˙22=2(θ˙12cos2θ1+θ˙12sin2θ1+14θ˙22cos2θ2+14θ˙22sin2θ2+θ˙1θ˙2cosθ1cosθ2+θ˙1θ˙2sinθ1sinθ2)=2(θ˙12+14θ˙22+θ˙1θ˙2cos(θ1θ2)).

Substituting the coordinates above into the definition of the Lagrangian, and rearranging the equation, gives L=12m2(θ˙12+14θ˙12+14θ˙22+θ˙1θ˙2cos(θ1θ2))+124m2(θ˙12+θ˙22)mg(y1+y2)=16m2(θ˙22+4θ˙12+3θ˙1θ˙2cos(θ1θ2))+12mg(3cosθ1+cosθ2).

The equations of motion can now be derived using the Euler–Lagrange equations, which are given by ddtLθ˙iLθi=0,i=1,2. We begin with the equation of motion for θ1. The derivatives of the Lagrangian are given by Lθ1=12m2θ˙1θ˙2sin(θ1θ2)32mgsinθ1 and Lθ˙1=43m2θ˙1+12m2θ˙2cos(θ1θ2). Thus ddtLθ˙1=43m2θ¨1+12m2θ¨2cos(θ1θ2)12m2θ˙2(θ˙1θ˙2)sin(θ1θ2). Combining these results and simplifying yields the first equation of motion, |equation=43θ¨1+12θ¨2cos(θ1θ2)+12θ˙22sin(θ1θ2)+32gsinθ1=0.

Similarly, the derivatives of the Lagrangian with respect to θ2 and θ˙2 are given by Lθ2=12m2θ˙1θ˙2sin(θ1θ2)12mgsinθ2 and Lθ˙2=13m2θ˙2+12m2θ˙1cos(θ1θ2). Thus ddtLθ˙2=13m2θ¨2+12m2θ¨1cos(θ1θ2)12m2θ˙1(θ˙1θ˙2)sin(θ1θ2). Plugging these results into the Euler-Lagrange equation and simplifying yields the second equation of motion, 13θ¨2+12θ¨1cos(θ1θ2)12θ˙12sin(θ1θ2)+12gsinθ2=0.

No closed form solutions for θ1 and θ2 as functions of time are known, therefore the system can only be solved numerically, using the Runge Kutta method or similar techniques.

Parametric plot for the time evolution of the angles of a double pendulum. Note that the graph resembles Brownian motion.

Chaotic motion

Graph of the time for the pendulum to flip over as a function of initial conditions
Long exposure of double pendulum exhibiting chaotic motion (tracked with an LED)
Three double pendulums with nearly identical starting conditions diverge over time, demonstrating the chaotic nature of the system.

The double pendulum undergoes chaotic motion, and clearly shows a sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The image to the right shows the amount of elapsed time before the pendulum flips over, as a function of initial position when released at rest. Here, the initial value of Template:Math ranges along the Template:Mvar-direction from −3.14 to 3.14. The initial value Template:Math ranges along the Template:Mvar-direction, from −3.14 to 3.14. The color of each pixel indicates whether either pendulum flips within:

  • g (black)
  • 10g (red)
  • 100g (green)
  • 1000g (blue) or
  • 10000g (purple).

Initial conditions that do not lead to a flip within 10000g are plotted white.

The boundary of the central white region is defined in part by energy conservation with the following curve: 3cosθ1+cosθ2=2.

Within the region defined by this curve, that is if3cosθ1+cosθ2>2,then it is energetically impossible for either pendulum to flip. Outside this region, the pendulum can flip, but it is a complex question to determine when it will flip. Similar behavior is observed for a double pendulum composed of two point masses rather than two rods with distributed mass.[2]

The lack of a natural excitation frequency has led to the use of double pendulum systems in seismic resistance designs in buildings, where the building itself is the primary inverted pendulum, and a secondary mass is connected to complete the double pendulum.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

Template:Chaos theory

  1. Template:Cite journal
  2. Alex Small, Sample Final Project: One Signature of Chaos in the Double Pendulum, (2013). A report produced as an example for students. Includes a derivation of the equations of motion, and a comparison between the double pendulum with 2 point masses and the double pendulum with 2 rods.