Dirichlet integral
Template:Use American English Template:Short description Template:Distinguish

Script error: No such module "sidebar". In mathematics, there are several integrals known as the Dirichlet integral, after the German mathematician Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet, one of which is the improper integral of the sinc function over the positive real number line.
This integral is not absolutely convergent, meaning has an infinite Lebesgue or Riemann improper integral over the positive real line, so the sinc function is not Lebesgue integrable over the positive real line. The sinc function is, however, integrable in the sense of the improper Riemann integral or the generalized Riemann or Henstock–Kurzweil integral.[1][2] This can be seen by using Dirichlet's test for improper integrals.
It is a good illustration of special techniques for evaluating definite integrals, particularly when it is not useful to directly apply the fundamental theorem of calculus due to the lack of an elementary antiderivative for the integrand, as the sine integral, an antiderivative of the sinc function, is not an elementary function. In this case, the improper definite integral can be determined in several ways: the Laplace transform, double integration, differentiating under the integral sign, contour integration, and the Dirichlet kernel. But since the integrand is an even function, the domain of integration can be extended to the negative real number line as well.
Evaluation
Laplace transform
Let be a function defined whenever Template:Tmath. Then its Laplace transform is given by if the integral exists.[3]
A property of the Laplace transform useful for evaluating improper integrals is provided exists.
In what follows, one needs the result Template:Tmath, which is the Laplace transform of the function Template:See below as well as a version of Abel's theorem (a consequence of the final value theorem for the Laplace transform).
Therefore,
Double integration
Evaluating the Dirichlet integral using the Laplace transform is equivalent to calculating the same double definite integral by changing the order of integration, namely, The change of order is justified by the fact that for all Template:Tmath, the integral is absolutely convergent.
Differentiation under the integral sign (Feynman's trick)
First rewrite the integral as a function of the additional variable Template:Tmath, namely, the Laplace transform of Template:Tmath. So let
In order to evaluate the Dirichlet integral, we need to determine Template:Tmath. The continuity of can be justified by applying the dominated convergence theorem after integration by parts. Differentiate with respect to and apply the Leibniz rule for differentiating under the integral sign to obtain
Now, using Euler's formula Template:Tmath, one can express the sine function in terms of complex exponentials:
Therefore,
Integrating with respect to gives
where is a constant of integration to be determined. Since Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath, using the principal value. This means that for
Finally, by continuity at Template:Tmath, we have Template:Tmath, as before.
Complex contour integration
Consider
As a function of the complex variable Template:Tmath, it has a simple pole at the origin, which prevents the application of Jordan's lemma, whose other hypotheses are satisfied.
Define then a new function[4]
The pole has been moved to the negative imaginary axis, so can be integrated along the semicircle of radius centered at extending in the positive imaginary direction, and closed along the real axis. One then takes the limit Template:Tmath.
The complex integral is zero by the residue theorem, as there are no poles inside the integration path Template:Tmath:
The second term vanishes as goes to infinity. As for the first integral, one can use one version of the Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem for integrals over the real line: for a complex-valued function Template:Mvar defined and continuously differentiable on the real line and real constants and with one finds
where denotes the Cauchy principal value. Back to the above original calculation, one can write
By taking the imaginary part on both sides and noting that the function is even, we get
Finally,
Alternatively, choose as the integration contour for the union of upper half-plane semicircles of radii and together with two segments of the real line that connect them. On one hand the contour integral is zero, independently of and Template:Tmath; on the other hand, as and the integral's imaginary part converges to (here is any branch of logarithm on upper half-plane), leading to Template:Tmath.
Dirichlet kernel
Consider the well-known formula for the Dirichlet kernel:[5]
It immediately follows that:
Define
Clearly, is continuous when Template:Tmath; to see its continuity at Template:Tmath apply L'Hopital's Rule:
Hence, fulfills the requirements of the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma. This means:[6]
We would like to compute:
However, we must justify switching the real limit in to the integral limit in Template:Tmath, which will follow from showing that the limit does exist.
Using integration by parts, we have:
Now, as and the term on the left converges with no problem. See the list of limits of trigonometric functions. We now show that is absolutely integrable, which implies that the limit exists.[7]
First, we seek to bound the integral near the origin. Using the Taylor-series expansion of the cosine about zero,
Therefore,
Splitting the integral into pieces, we have
for some constant Template:Tmath. This shows that the integral is absolutely integrable, which implies the original integral exists, and switching from to was in fact justified, and the proof is complete.
See also
References
External links
Template:Integrals Template:Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite report
- ↑ The form of the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma used here is proven in Template:Harvp.
- ↑ Template:Cite report