Dicke state

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Technical In quantum optics and quantum information, a Dicke state is a quantum state defined by Robert H. Dicke in connection to spontaneous radiation processes taking place in an ensemble of two-state atoms. A Dicke state is the simultaneous eigenstate of the angular momentum operators J2 and Jz. [1] Dicke states have recently been realized with photons with up to six particles and cold atoms of more than thousands of particles. They are highly entangled, and in quantum metrology they lead to the maximal Heisenberg scaling of the precision of parameter estimation.

Defining equations

Dicke states are defined in a system of N spin-s particles as the simultaneous eigenstates of the angular momentum operators J2 and Jz by the equations

J2|j,jz,α=j(j+1)|j,jz,α

and

Jz|j,jz,α=jz|j,jz,α.

Here, α is a label used to distinguish several states orthogonal to each other, for which the two eigenvalues are the same.

It is worth to consider the s=1/2 case, namely an N-qubit system. For j=N/2, Dicke states are symmetric. In this case, we do not need the additional parameter α, since for a given jz, there is only a single simultaneous eigenstate of J2 and Jz.

It is also common to use for the characterization of these states the quantity n=N/2jz.[2] They can be written as

|Dn(N)=(Nn)1/2k𝒫k(|0(Nn)|1n),

where n=0,1,...,N is the number of 1's, and the summation is over all distinct permutations.

A W-state is given as

|W=1N(|1000...000+|0100...000+|0010...000+...+|0000...001)

and it equals the Dicke state |D1(N).

The entanglement properties of symmetric Dicke states have been studied extensively.[3]

Symmetric Dicke states of N spin-s particles can easily be mapped to symmetric Dicke states of 2sN spin-1/2 particles.[4]

The case of j<N/2, i.e., the case of non-symmetric Dicke states in multi-qubit systems is more complicated. In this case, the simultaneous eigenstates are denoted by |j,jz,α, and we need now the α label to dinstinguish several eigenstates with the same eigenvalues orthogonal to each other. These states can also be obtained expclicitly.[5]

Fidelity

In an experiment, determining the fidelity with respect to pure quantum states is not an easy task in general. However, for states in the symmetric (bosonic subspace) the necessary measuement effort increases only polynomially with the number of particles. For instance, for N qubits it is upper bounded by N2/2+3N/2+1 local measurement settings, which is known from the theory of Permutationally invariant quantum state tomography. It is also a valid bound for measuring the fidelity with respect to symmetric Dicke states.

For the 4-qubit case, 7 local measurement settings is sufficient,[6][7] while for the 6-qubit case 21 local measuementy settings is sufficient.[8][9][7]

Entanglement properties of Dicke states

When a Dicke states has been prepared in an experiment, it is important to verify that the state has been prepared with a good quality. Apart from obtaining the fidelity, a usual goal is to show that the quantum state was highly entangled.

If for a quantum state ϱ the fidelity with respect to W-states

Tr(ϱ|WW|)>11/N

holds then the quantum state is genuine multipartite entangled. This means that all the particles are entangled with each other, and the quantum state cannot be put together with entangled quantum states of smaller units by trivial operations such as making a tensor product and mixing.

Note that the bound is approaching 1 for a large N, which can make experiments with large systems difficult.

For the symmetric Dicke state |DN/2(N), if for the fidelity of a quantum state

Tr(ϱ|DN/2(N)DN/2(N)|)>12NN1

holds then the quantum state is genuine multipartite entangled.[10] Now the bound approaches 1/2 for large N, which makes experiments for detecting genuine multipartite entanglement feasible even for a large N.

Unlike in the case of GHZ states, the entanglement of Dicke states can be detected by measuring collective observables.[11] It is also possible to detect multipartite entanglement or entanglement depth of such states based on collective measurements.[12][13] Finally, there are efficient methods to detect multipartite entanglement of noisey Dicke states based on their density matrix.[14]

Quantum metrological properties

For an N-qubit quantum state,

FQ[ϱ,Jl]N2

holds for l=x,y,z, where Jl are the components of the collective angular momentum

Jl=12n=1Nσl(n),

and σl are the Pauli spin matrices.

Here, FQ[ϱ,H] denotes the quantum Fisher information characterizing how well the state ϱ can be used to estimate the parameter θ in the unitary dynamics

U=exp(iHθ).

For separable states the bound discovered by Pezze and Smerzi [15]

FQ[ϱ,Jl]N

holds, which is relevant for linear interferometers, a very large class of interferometers used in experiments. For the Dicke state |DN/2(N)

FQ[ϱ,Jx]=FQ[ϱ,Jy]=N(N+2)/2

holds, which corresponds to a quadratic scaling in the particle number, that is, a Heisenberg scaling.

Such Dicke states also saturate the relation[16][17]

FQ[ϱ,Jx]+FQ[ϱ,Jy]+FQ[ϱ,Jz]N(N+2),

which is valid for any quantum state. Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states also saturate this relation.

Experiments with Dicke states

W-states of three qubits have been created in photons.[18]

Symmetric Dicke states |DN/2(N) have been created in a four and a six-qubit photonic experiment in which genuine four- and six-paricle entanglement, respectively, has been demonstrated.[6][8][9]

They have also been prepared in a Bose-Einstein condensate with thousands of atoms.[19][20]

Dicke states have also been used for quantum metrology in cold gases[19] and photonic systems.[21] In these experiments it has been demonstrated that the experimentally created Dicke states outperform separable states in metrology.

Multipartite entanglement and the depth of entanglement has been detected in Dicke states in an ensemble of cold atoms.[12][22][23]

Bipartite entanglement and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering has been detected in Dicke states of an ensemble of thousands of cold atoms.[24][25]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Quantum computing