Decomposition theorem of Beilinson, Bernstein and Deligne

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, especially algebraic geometry, the decomposition theorem of Beilinson, Bernstein and Deligne or BBD decomposition theorem is a set of results concerning the cohomology of algebraic varieties. It was originally conjectured by Gelfand and MacPherson.[1]

Statement

Decomposition for smooth proper maps

The first case of the decomposition theorem arises via the hard Lefschetz theorem which gives isomorphisms, for a smooth proper map f:XY of relative dimension d between two projective varieties[2]

ηi:Rdif*()Rd+if*().

Here η is the fundamental class of a hyperplane section, f* is the direct image (pushforward) and Rnf* is the n-th derived functor of the direct image. This derived functor measures the n-th cohomologies of f1(U), for UY. In fact, the particular case when Y is a point, amounts to the isomorphism

ηi:Hdi(X,)Hd+i(X,).

This hard Lefschetz isomorphism induces canonical isomorphisms

Rf*()i=ddRd+if*()[di].

Moreover, the sheaves Rd+if* appearing in this decomposition are local systems, i.e., locally free sheaves of Q-vector spaces, which are moreover semisimple, i.e., a direct sum of local systems without nontrivial local subsystems.

Decomposition for proper maps

The decomposition theorem generalizes this fact to the case of a proper, but not necessarily smooth map f:XY between varieties. In a nutshell, the results above remain true when the notion of local systems is replaced by perverse sheaves.

The hard Lefschetz theorem above takes the following form:[3][4] there is an isomorphism in the derived category of sheaves on Y:

pHi(Rf*)pH+i(Rf*),

where Rf* is the total derived functor of f* and pHi is the i-th truncation with respect to the perverse t-structure.

Moreover, there is an isomorphism

Rf*ICXipHi(Rf*ICX)[i].

where the summands are semi-simple perverse-sheaves, meaning they are direct sums of push-forwards of intersection cohomology sheaves.[5]

If X is not smooth, then the above results remain true when [dimX] is replaced by the intersection cohomology complex IC.[3]

Proofs

The decomposition theorem was first proved by Beilinson, Bernstein, and Deligne.[6] Their proof is based on the usage of weights on l-adic sheaves in positive characteristic. A different proof using mixed Hodge modules was given by Saito. A more geometric proof, based on the notion of semismall maps was given by de Cataldo and Migliorini.[7]

For semismall maps, the decomposition theorem also applies to Chow motives.[8]

Applications of the theorem

Cohomology of a Rational Lefschetz Pencil

Consider a rational morphism f:X1 from a smooth quasi-projective variety given by [f1(x):f2(x)]. If we set the vanishing locus of f1,f2 as Y then there is an induced morphism X~=BlY(X)1. We can compute the cohomology of X from the intersection cohomology of BlY(X) and subtracting off the cohomology from the blowup along Y. This can be done using the perverse spectral sequence

E2l,m=Hl(1;𝔭m(ICX~())IHl+m(X~;)Hl+m(X;)

Local invariant cycle theorem

Template:Main Let f:XY be a proper morphism between complex algebraic varieties such that X is smooth. Also, let y0 be a regular value of f that is in an open ball B centered at y. Then the restriction map

H*(f1(y),)=H*(f1(B),)H*(f1(y0),)π1,loc

is surjective, where π1,loc is the fundamental group of the intersection of B with the set of regular values of f.[9]

References

Template:Reflist

Survey Articles

Pedagogical References

Further reading

  1. Conjecture 2.10. of Sergei Gelfand & Robert MacPherson, Verma modules and Schubert cells: A dictionary.
  2. Template:Citation
  3. 3.0 3.1 Template:Harvnb. NB: To be precise, the reference is for the decomposition.
  4. Template:Harvnb NB: To be precise, the reference is for the decomposition.
  5. Template:Harvnb
  6. Template:Cite journal
  7. Template:Cite journal
  8. Template:Citation
  9. Template:Harvnb