Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, the convergence condition by Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) is a necessary condition for convergence while solving certain partial differential equations (usually hyperbolic PDEs) numerically. It arises in the numerical analysis of explicit time integration schemes, when these are used for the numerical solution. As a consequence, the time step must be less than a certain upper bound, given a fixed spatial increment, in many explicit time-marching computer simulations; otherwise, the simulation produces incorrect or unstable results. The condition is named after Richard Courant, Kurt Friedrichs, and Hans Lewy who described it in their 1928 paper.[1]

Heuristic description

The principle behind the condition is that, for example, if a wave is moving across a discrete spatial grid and we want to compute its amplitude at discrete time steps of equal duration,[2] then this duration must be less than the time for the wave to travel to adjacent grid points. As a corollary, when the grid point separation is reduced, the upper limit for the time step also decreases. In essence, the numerical domain of dependence of any point in space and time (as determined by initial conditions and the parameters of the approximation scheme) must include the analytical domain of dependence (wherein the initial conditions have an effect on the exact value of the solution at that point) to assure that the scheme can access the information required to form the solution.

Statement

To make a reasonably formally precise statement of the condition, it is necessary to define the following quantities:

The spatial coordinates and the time are discrete-valued independent variables, which are placed at regular distances called the interval length[3] and the time step, respectively. Using these names, the CFL condition relates the length of the time step to a function of the interval lengths of each spatial coordinate and of the maximum speed that information can travel in the physical space.

Operatively, the CFL condition is commonly prescribed for those terms of the finite-difference approximation of general partial differential equations that model the advection phenomenon.[4]

The one-dimensional case

For the one-dimensional case, the continuous-time model equation (that is usually solved for w) is:

wt+uwx=0.

The CFL condition then has the following form:

C=uΔtΔxCmax

where the dimensionless number C is called the Courant number,

The value of Cmax changes with the method used to solve the discretised equation, especially depending on whether the method is explicit or implicit. If an explicit (time-marching) solver is used then typically Cmax=1. Implicit (matrix) solvers are usually less sensitive to numerical instability and so larger values of Cmax may be tolerated.

The two and general n-dimensional case

In the two-dimensional case, the CFL condition becomes

C=uxΔtΔx+uyΔtΔyCmax

with the obvious meanings of the symbols involved. By analogy with the two-dimensional case, the general CFL condition for the n-dimensional case is the following one:

C=Δt(i=1nuiΔxi)Cmax.

The interval length is not required to be the same for each spatial variable Δxi,i=1,,n. This "degree of freedom" can be used to somewhat optimize the value of the time step for a particular problem, by varying the values of the different interval to keep it not too small.

The case where w is a vector

In the cases above w was a scalar. The vector form of the first order hyperbolic PDE is

𝐰t+𝐀_𝐰x=0.

where 𝐰N is a vector of arbitrary dimension N and 𝐀_N×N is accordingly a matrix of order N. In this case the CFL condition is[5]

ΔtΔx=1|λ|maxCmax

where |λ|max is the magnitude of the largest eigenvalue of the matrix 𝐀_. The extension to multiple dimensions follows the logic described above.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

  • Carlos A. de Moura and Carlos S. Kubrusly (Eds.): "The Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) Condition: 80 Years After Its Discovery", Birkhauser, ISBN 978-0-8176-8393-1 (2013).
  1. See reference Template:Harvnb. There exists also an English translation of the 1928 German original: see references Template:Harvnb and Template:Harvnb.
  2. This situation commonly occurs when a hyperbolic partial differential operator has been approximated by a finite difference equation, which is then solved by numerical linear algebra methods.
  3. This quantity is not necessarily the same for each spatial variable, as it is shown in "The two and general n–dimensional case" section of this entry: it can be selected to somewhat relax the condition.
  4. Precisely, this is the hyperbolic part of the PDE under analysis.
  5. R.J. LeVeque, "Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, 2nd Ed.", Birkhauser Verlag, 1992,