Convergence group

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, a convergence group or a discrete convergence group is a group Γ acting by homeomorphisms on a compact metrizable space M in a way that generalizes the properties of the action of Kleinian group by Möbius transformations on the ideal boundary 𝕊2 of the hyperbolic 3-space ℍ3. The notion of a convergence group was introduced by Gehring and Martin (1987) [1] and has since found wide applications in geometric topology, quasiconformal analysis, and geometric group theory.

Formal definition

Let Γ be a group acting by homeomorphisms on a compact metrizable space M. This action is called a convergence action or a discrete convergence action (and then Γ is called a convergence group or a discrete convergence group for this action) if for every infinite distinct sequence of elements γn∈Γ there exist a subsequence γnk,k=1,2,… and points a,b∈M such that the maps γnk|M∖{a} converge uniformly on compact subsets to the constant map sending M∖{a} to b. Here converging uniformly on compact subsets means that for every open neighborhood U of b in M and every compact K⊂M∖{a} there exists an index k0≥1 such that for every k≥k0, γnk(K)⊆U. Note that the "poles" a,b∈M associated with the subsequence γnk are not required to be distinct.

Reformulation in terms of the action on distinct triples

The above definition of convergence group admits a useful equivalent reformulation in terms of the action of Γ on the "space of distinct triples" of M. For a set M denote Θ(M):=M3∖Δ(M), where Δ(M)={(a,b,c)∈M3∣#{a,b,c}≤2}. The set Θ(M) is called the "space of distinct triples" for M.

Then the following equivalence is known to hold:[2]

Let Γ be a group acting by homeomorphisms on a compact metrizable space M with at least two points. Then this action is a discrete convergence action if and only if the induced action of Γ on Θ(M) is properly discontinuous.

Examples

Classification of elements in convergence groups

Let Γ be a group acting by homeomorphisms on a compact metrizable space Mwith at least three points, and let γ∈Γ. Then it is known (Lemma 3.1 in [2] or Lemma 6.2 in [3]) that exactly one of the following occurs:

(1) The element γ has finite order in Γ; in this case γ is called elliptic.

(2) The element γ has infinite order in Γ and the fixed set FixM(γ) is a single point; in this case γ is called parabolic.

(3) The element γ has infinite order in Γ and the fixed set FixM(γ) consists of two distinct points; in this case γ is called loxodromic.

Moreover, for every p≠0 the elements γ and γphave the same type. Also in cases (2) and (3) FixM(γ)=FixM(γp) (where p≠0) and the group ⟨γ⟩ acts properly discontinuously on M∖FixM(γ). Additionally, if γ is loxodromic, then ⟨γ⟩ acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly on M∖FixM(γ).

If γ∈Γ is parabolic with a fixed point a∈M then for every x∈M one has limn→∞γnx=limn→−∞γnx=a If γ∈Γ is loxodromic, then FixM(γ) can be written as FixM(γ)={a−,a+} so that for every x∈M∖{a−} one has limn→∞γnx=a+ and for every x∈M∖{a+} one has limn→−∞γnx=a−, and these convergences are uniform on compact subsets of M∖{a−,a+}.

Uniform convergence groups

A discrete convergence action of a group Γ on a compact metrizable space M is called uniform (in which case Γ is called a uniform convergence group) if the action of Γ on Θ(M) is co-compact. Thus Γ is a uniform convergence group if and only if its action on Θ(M) is both properly discontinuous and co-compact.

Conical limit points

Let Γ act on a compact metrizable space M as a discrete convergence group. A point x∈M is called a conical limit point (sometimes also called a radial limit point or a point of approximation) if there exist an infinite sequence of distinct elements γn∈Γ and distinct points a,b∈M such that limn→∞γnx=a and for every y∈M∖{x} one has limn→∞γny=b.

An important result of Tukia,[4] also independently obtained by Bowditch,[2][5] states:

A discrete convergence group action of a group Γ on a compact metrizable space M is uniform if and only if every non-isolated point of M is a conical limit point.

Word-hyperbolic groups and their boundaries

It was already observed by Gromov[6] that the natural action by translations of a word-hyperbolic group G on its boundary ∂G is a uniform convergence action (see[2] for a formal proof). Bowditch[5] proved an important converse, thus obtaining a topological characterization of word-hyperbolic groups:

Theorem. Let G act as a discrete uniform convergence group on a compact metrizable space M with no isolated points. Then the group G is word-hyperbolic and there exists a G-equivariant homeomorphism M→∂G.

Convergence actions on the circle

An isometric action of a group G on the hyperbolic plane ℍ2 is called geometric if this action is properly discontinuous and cocompact. Every geometric action of G on ℍ2 induces a uniform convergence action of G on 𝕊1=∂H2≈∂G. An important result of Tukia (1986),[7] Gabai (1992),[8] Casson–Jungreis (1994),[9] and Freden (1995)[10] shows that the converse also holds:

Theorem. If G is a group acting as a discrete uniform convergence group on 𝕊1 then this action is topologically conjugate to an action induced by a geometric action of G on ℍ2 by isometries.

Note that whenever G acts geometrically on ℍ2, the group G is virtually a hyperbolic surface group, that is, G contains a finite index subgroup isomorphic to the fundamental group of a closed hyperbolic surface.

Convergence actions on the 2-sphere

One of the equivalent reformulations of Cannon's conjecture, (posed by James W. Cannon,[11] although an earlier and more general conjecture, reducing to the Cannon conjecture for compact type, was given by Gaven J. Martin and Richard K. Skora [12])

These conjectures are in terms of word-hyperbolic groups with boundaries homeomorphic to 𝕊2, says that if G is a group acting as a discrete uniform convergence group on 𝕊2 then this action is topologically conjugate to an action induced by a geometric action of G on ℍ3 by isometries. These conjectures still remains open.

Applications and further generalizations

  • Yaman gave a characterization of relatively hyperbolic groups in terms of convergence actions,[13] generalizing Bowditch's characterization of word-hyperbolic groups as uniform convergence groups.
  • One can consider more general versions of group actions with "convergence property" without the discreteness assumption.[14]
  • The most general version of the notion of Cannon–Thurston map, originally defined in the context of Kleinian and word-hyperbolic groups, can be defined and studied in the context of setting of convergence groups.[15]

References

Template:Reflist

  1. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Template:Cite book
  3. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  4. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite journal
  6. ↑ Template:Cite book
  7. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  8. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  9. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  10. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  11. ↑ Template:Cite book
  12. ↑ {{Citation last1=Martin | first1=Gaven J. | last2=Skora | first2=Richard K. | title=Group Actions of the 2-Sphere | journal=American Journal of Mathematics | volume=111 | pages=387–402 | publisher=The Johns Hopkins University Press | date=1989 }}
  13. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  14. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  15. ↑ Template:Cite journal