Conductor (class field theory)

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In algebraic number theory, the conductor of a finite abelian extension of local or global fields provides a quantitative measure of the ramification in the extension. The definition of the conductor is related to the Artin map.

Local conductor

Let L/K be a finite abelian extension of non-Archimedean local fields. The conductor of L/K, denoted 𝔣(L/K), is the smallest non-negative integer n such that the higher unit group

U(n)=1+𝔪Kn={u∈𝒪×:u≡1(mod⁡𝔪Kn)}

is contained in NL/K(L×), where NL/K is field norm map and 𝔪K is the maximal ideal of K.Template:Sfnp Equivalently, n is the smallest integer such that the local Artin map is trivial on UK(n). Sometimes, the conductor is defined as 𝔪Kn where n is as above.Template:Sfnp

The conductor of an extension measures the ramification. Qualitatively, the extension is unramified if and only if the conductor is zero,Template:Sfnp and it is tamely ramified if and only if the conductor is 1.Template:Sfnp More precisely, the conductor computes the non-triviality of higher ramification groups: if s is the largest integer for which the "lower numbering" higher ramification group Gs is non-trivial, then 𝔣(L/K)=ηL/K(s)+1, where ηL/K is the function that translates from "lower numbering" to "upper numbering" of higher ramification groups.Template:Sfnp

The conductor of L/K is also related to the Artin conductors of characters of the Galois group Gal⁡(L/K). Specifically,Template:Sfnp

𝔪K𝔣(L/K)=lcmχ𝔪K𝔣χ

where χ varies over all multiplicative complex characters of Gal⁡(L/K), 𝔣χ is the Artin conductor of χ, and lcm is the least common multiple.

More general fields

The conductor can be defined in the same way for L/K a not necessarily abelian finite Galois extension of local fields.Template:Sfnp However, it only depends on Lab/K, the maximal abelian extension of K in L, because of the "norm limitation theorem", which states that, in this situation,Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

NL/K(L×)=NLab/K((Lab)×).

Additionally, the conductor can be defined when L and K are allowed to be slightly more general than local, namely if they are complete valued fields with quasi-finite residue field.[1]

Archimedean fields

Mostly for the sake of global conductors, the conductor of the trivial extension ℝ/ℝ is defined to be 0, and the conductor of the extension ℂ/ℝ is defined to be 1.Template:Sfnp

Global conductor

Algebraic number fields

The conductor of an abelian extension L/K of number fields can be defined, similarly to the local case, using the Artin map. Specifically, let θ:lm→Gal⁡(L/K) be the global Artin map where the modulus m is a defining modulus for L/K; we say that Artin reciprocity holds for m if θ factors through the ray class group modulo m. We define the conductor of L/K, denoted 𝔣(L/K), to be the highest common factor of all moduli for which reciprocity holds; in fact reciprocity holds for 𝔣(L/K), so it is the smallest such modulus.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp[2]

Example

  • Taking as base the field of rational numbers, the Kronecker–Weber theorem states that an algebraic number field K is abelian over ℚ if and only if it is a subfield of a cyclotomic field ℚ(ζn), where ζn denotes a primitive nth root of unity.Template:Sfnp If n is the smallest integer for which this holds, the conductor of K is then n if K is fixed by complex conjugation and n∞ otherwise.
  • Let L/K be ℚ(d)/ℚ where d is a squarefree integer. Then,Template:Sfnp
    𝔣(ℚ(d)/ℚ)={|Δℚ(d)|for d>0∞|Δℚ(d)|for d<0
where Δℚ(d) is the discriminant of ℚ(d)/ℚ.

Relation to local conductors and ramification

The global conductor is the product of local conductors:[3]

𝔣(L/K)=∏𝔭𝔭𝔣(L𝔭/K𝔭).

As a consequence, a finite prime is ramified in L/K if, and only if, it divides 𝔣(L/K).Template:Sfnp An infinite prime v occurs in the conductor if, and only if, v is real and becomes complex in L.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

  1. ↑ As in Template:Harvtxt, §XI.4. This is the situation in which the formalism of local class field theory works.
  2. ↑ Some authors omit infinite places from the conductor, see Template:Harvtxt, §VI.6.
  3. ↑ For the finite part see Template:Harvtxt, proposition VI.6.5, and for the infinite part Template:Harvtxt, definition 3.4.1.