Combinatorial mirror symmetry

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Multiple issues A purely combinatorial approach to mirror symmetry was suggested by Victor Batyrev using the polar duality for d-dimensional convex polyhedra.[1] The most famous examples of the polar duality provide Platonic solids: e.g., the cube is dual to octahedron, the dodecahedron is dual to icosahedron. There is a natural bijection between the k-dimensional faces of a d-dimensional convex polyhedron P and (d−k−1)-dimensional faces of the dual polyhedron P∗ and one has (P∗)∗=P. In Batyrev's combinatorial approach to mirror symmetry the polar duality is applied to special d-dimensional convex lattice polytopes which are called reflexive polytopes.[2]

It was observed by Victor Batyrev and Duco van Straten[3] that the method of Philip Candelas et al.[4] for computing the number of rational curves on Calabi–Yau quintic 3-folds can be applied to arbitrary Calabi–Yau complete intersections using the generalized A-hypergeometric functions introduced by Israel Gelfand, Michail Kapranov and Andrei Zelevinsky[5] (see also the talk of Alexander Varchenko[6]), where A is the set of lattice points in a reflexive polytope P.

The combinatorial mirror duality for Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties has been generalized by Lev Borisov [7] in the case of Calabi–Yau complete intersections in Gorenstein toric Fano varieties. Using the notions of dual cone and polar cone one can consider the polar duality for reflexive polytopes as a special case of the duality for convex Gorenstein cones [8] and of the duality for Gorenstein polytopes.[9][10]

For any fixed natural number d there exists only a finite number N(d) of d-dimensional reflexive polytopes up to a GL(d,ℤ)-isomorphism. The number N(d) is known only for d≤4: N(1)=1, N(2)=16, N(3)=4319, N(4)=473800776. The combinatorial classification of d-dimensional reflexive simplices up to a GL(d,ℤ)-isomorphism is closely related to the enumeration of all solutions (k0,k1,…,kd)∈ℕd+1 of the diophantine equation 1k0+⋯+1kd=1. The classification of 4-dimensional reflexive polytopes up to a GL(4,ℤ)-isomorphism is important for constructing many topologically different 3-dimensional Calabi–Yau manifolds using hypersurfaces in 4-dimensional toric varieties which are Gorenstein Fano varieties. The complete list of 3-dimensional and 4-dimensional reflexive polytopes have been obtained by physicists Maximilian Kreuzer and Harald Skarke using a special software in Polymake.[11][12][13][14]

A mathematical explanation of the combinatorial mirror symmetry has been obtained by Lev Borisov via vertex operator algebras which are algebraic counterparts of conformal field theories.[15]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

  1. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  2. ↑ Template:Cite web
  3. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  4. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  5. ↑ I. Gelfand, M. Kapranov, S. Zelevinski (1989), "Hypergeometric functions and toric varieties", Funct. Anal. Appl. 23, no. 2, 94–10.
  6. ↑ A. Varchenko (1990), "Multidimensional hypergeometric functions in conformal field theory, algebraic K-theory, algebraic geometry", Proc. ICM-90, 281–300.
  7. ↑ L. Borisov (1994), "Towards the Mirror Symmetry for Calabi–Yau Complete intersections in Gorenstein Toric Fano Varieties", Template:Arxiv
  8. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  9. ↑ Template:Cite journal
  10. ↑ Template:Cite web
  11. ↑ M. Kreuzer, H. Skarke (1997), "On the classification of reflexive polyhedra", Comm. Math. Phys., 185, 495–508
  12. ↑ M. Kreuzer, H. Skarke (1998) "Classification of reflexive polyhedra in three dimensions", Advances Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 847–864
  13. ↑ M. Kreuzer, H. Skarke (2002), "Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions", Advances Theor. Math. Phys., 4, 1209–1230
  14. ↑ M. Kreuzer, H. Skarke, Calabi–Yau data, http://hep.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~kreuzer/CY/
  15. ↑ L. Borisov (2001), "Vertex algebras and mirror symmetry", Comm. Math. Phys., 215, no. 3, 517–557.