Cauchy product

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, more specifically in mathematical analysis, the Cauchy product is the discrete convolution of two infinite series. It is named after the French mathematician Augustin-Louis Cauchy.

Definitions

The Cauchy product may apply to infinite series[1][2] or power series.[3][4] When people apply it to finite sequences[5] or finite series, that can be seen merely as a particular case of a product of series with a finite number of non-zero coefficients (see discrete convolution).

Convergence issues are discussed in the next section.

Cauchy product of two infinite series

Let i=0ai and j=0bj be two infinite series with complex terms. The Cauchy product of these two infinite series is defined by a discrete convolution as follows:

(i=0ai)(j=0bj)=k=0ck     where     ck=l=0kalbkl.

Cauchy product of two power series

Consider the following two power series

i=0aixi     and     j=0bjxj

with complex coefficients {ai} and {bj}. The Cauchy product of these two power series is defined by a discrete convolution as follows:

(i=0aixi)(j=0bjxj)=k=0ckxk     where     ck=l=0kalbkl.

Convergence and Mertens' theorem

Template:Distinguish

Let Template:Math and Template:Math be real or complex sequences. It was proved by Franz Mertens that, if the series n=0an converges to Template:Math and n=0bn converges to Template:Math, and at least one of them converges absolutely, then their Cauchy product converges to Template:Math.[6] The theorem is still valid in a Banach algebra (see first line of the following proof).

It is not sufficient for both series to be convergent; if both sequences are conditionally convergent, the Cauchy product does not have to converge towards the product of the two series, as the following example shows:

Example

Consider the two alternating series with

an=bn=(1)nn+1,

which are only conditionally convergent (the divergence of the series of the absolute values follows from the direct comparison test and the divergence of the harmonic series). The terms of their Cauchy product are given by

cn=k=0n(1)kk+1(1)nknk+1=(1)nk=0n1(k+1)(nk+1)

for every integer Template:Math. Since for every Template:Math we have the inequalities Template:Math and Template:Math, it follows for the square root in the denominator that Template:Math, hence, because there are Template:Math summands,

|cn|k=0n1n+1=1

for every integer Template:Math. Therefore, Template:Math does not converge to zero as Template:Math, hence the series of the Template:Math diverges by the term test.

Proof of Mertens' theorem

For simplicity, we will prove it for complex numbers. However, the proof we are about to give is formally identical for an arbitrary Banach algebra (not even commutativity or associativity is required).

Assume without loss of generality that the series n=0an converges absolutely. Define the partial sums

An=i=0nai,Bn=i=0nbiandCn=i=0nci

with

ci=k=0iakbik.

Then

Cn=i=0naniBi

by rearrangement, hence

Template:NumBlk

Fix Template:Math. Since k|ak|< by absolute convergence, and since Template:Math converges to Template:Math as Template:Math, there exists an integer Template:Math such that, for all integers Template:Math,

Template:NumBlk

(this is the only place where the absolute convergence is used). Since the series of the Template:Math converges, the individual Template:Math must converge to 0 by the term test. Hence there exists an integer Template:Math such that, for all integers Template:Math,

Template:NumBlk

Also, since Template:Math converges to Template:Math as Template:Math, there exists an integer Template:Math such that, for all integers Template:Math,

Template:NumBlk

Then, for all integers Template:Math, use the representation (Template:EquationNote) for Template:Math, split the sum in two parts, use the triangle inequality for the absolute value, and finally use the three estimates (Template:EquationNote), (Template:EquationNote) and (Template:EquationNote) to show that

|CnAB|=|(AnA)B+i=0nani(BiB)||AnA||B|ε/3 by (4)+i=0N1|aniM||BiB|ε/3 by (3)+i=Nn|ani||BiB|ε/3 by (2)ε.

By the definition of convergence of a series, Template:Math as required.

Cesàro's theorem

In cases where the two sequences are convergent but not absolutely convergent, the Cauchy product is still Cesàro summable.[7] Specifically:

If (an)n0, (bn)n0 are real sequences with anA and bnB then

1N(n=1Ni=1nk=0iakbik)AB.

This can be generalised to the case where the two sequences are not convergent but just Cesàro summable:

Theorem

For r>1 and s>1, suppose the sequence (an)n0 is (C,r) summable with sum A and (bn)n0 is (C,s) summable with sum B. Then their Cauchy product is (C,r+s+1) summable with sum AB.

Examples

  • For some x,y, let an=xn/n! and bn=yn/n!. Then cn=i=0nxii!yni(ni)!=1n!i=0n(ni)xiyni=(x+y)nn! by definition and the binomial formula. Since, formally, exp(x)=an and exp(y)=bn, we have shown that exp(x+y)=cn. Since the limit of the Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent series is equal to the product of the limits of those series, we have proven the formula exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y) for all x,y.
  • As a second example, let an=bn=1 for all n. Then cn=n+1 for all n so the Cauchy product cn=(1,1+2,1+2+3,1+2+3+4,) does not converge.

Generalizations

All of the foregoing applies to sequences in (complex numbers). The Cauchy product can be defined for series in the n spaces (Euclidean spaces) where multiplication is the inner product. In this case, we have the result that if two series converge absolutely then their Cauchy product converges absolutely to the inner product of the limits.

Products of finitely many infinite series

Let n such that n2 (actually the following is also true for n=1 but the statement becomes trivial in that case) and let k1=0a1,k1,,kn=0an,kn be infinite series with complex coefficients, from which all except the nth one converge absolutely, and the nth one converges. Then the limit limNk1++knNa1,k1an,kn exists and we have: j=1n(kj=0aj,kj)=limNk1++knNa1,k1an,kn

Proof

Because N:k1++knNa1,k1an,kn=k1=0Nk2=0k1kn=0kn1a1,kna2,kn1knan,k1k2 the statement can be proven by induction over n: The case for n=2 is identical to the claim about the Cauchy product. This is our induction base.

The induction step goes as follows: Let the claim be true for an n such that n2, and let k1=0a1,k1,,kn+1=0an+1,kn+1 be infinite series with complex coefficients, from which all except the n+1th one converge absolutely, and the n+1-th one converges. We first apply the induction hypothesis to the series k1=0|a1,k1|,,kn=0|an,kn|. We obtain that the series k1=0k2=0k1kn=0kn1|a1,kna2,kn1knan,k1k2| converges, and hence, by the triangle inequality and the sandwich criterion, the series k1=0|k2=0k1kn=0kn1a1,kna2,kn1knan,k1k2| converges, and hence the series k1=0k2=0k1kn=0kn1a1,kna2,kn1knan,k1k2 converges absolutely. Therefore, by the induction hypothesis, by what Mertens proved, and by renaming of variables, we have: j=1n+1(kj=0aj,kj)=(kn+1=0an+1,kn+1=:akn+1)(k1=0k2=0k1kn=0kn1a1,kna2,kn1knan,k1k2=:bk1)=(k1=0k2=0k1k3=0k2kn=0kn1a1,kna2,kn1knan,k1k2=:ak1)(kn+1=0an+1,kn+1=:bkn+1)=(k1=0k3=0k1k4=0k3kn+1=0kna1,kn+1a2,knkn+1an,k1k3=:ak1)(k2=0an+1,k2=:bn+1,k2=:bk2)=(k1=0ak1)(k2=0bk2)=(k1=0k2=0k1ak2bk1k2)=(k1=0k2=0k1(k3=0k2kn+1=0kna1,kn+1a2,knkn+1an,k2k3=:ak2)(an+1,k1k2=:bk1k2))=(k1=0k2=0k1k3=0k2kn+1=0kna1,kn+1a2,knkn+1an,k2k3=:ak2an+1,k1k2=:bk1k2)=k1=0k2=0k1an+1,k1k2k3=0k2kn+1=0kna1,kn+1a2,knkn+1an,k2k3 Therefore, the formula also holds for n+1.

Relation to convolution of functions

A finite sequence can be viewed as an infinite sequence with only finitely many nonzero terms, or in other words as a function f: with finite support. For any complex-valued functions f, g on with finite support, one can take their convolution: (f*g)(n)=i+j=nf(i)g(j). Then (f*g)(n) is the same thing as the Cauchy product of f(n) and g(n).

More generally, given a monoid S, one can form the semigroup algebra [S] of S, with the multiplication given by convolution. If one takes, for example, S=d, then the multiplication on [S] is a generalization of the Cauchy product to higher dimension.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References