Cahen's constant

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, Cahen's constant is defined as the value of an infinite series of unit fractions with alternating signs:

C=∑i=0∞(−1)isi−1=11−12+16−142+11806−⋯≈0.643410546288... Template:OEIS

Here (si)i≥0 denotes Sylvester's sequence, which is defined recursively by

s0=2;si+1=1+∏j=0isj for i≥0.

Combining these fractions in pairs leads to an alternative expansion of Cahen's constant as a series of positive unit fractions formed from the terms in even positions of Sylvester's sequence. This series for Cahen's constant forms its greedy Egyptian expansion:

C=∑1s2i=12+17+11807+110650056950807+⋯

This constant is named after Template:Ill (also known for the Cahen–Mellin integral), who was the first to introduce it and prove its irrationality.Template:Sfnp

Continued fraction expansion

The majority of naturally occurringTemplate:Efn mathematical constants have no known simple patterns in their continued fraction expansions.Template:Sfnp Nevertheless, the complete continued fraction expansion of Cahen's constant C is known: it is C=[a02;a12,a22,a32,a42,…]=[0;1,1,1,4,9,196,16641,…] where the sequence of coefficients Template:Bi is defined by the recurrence relation a0=0,a1=1,an+2=an(1+anan+1)∀n∈ℤ⩾0. All the partial quotients of this expansion are squares of integers. Davison and Shallit made use of the continued fraction expansion to prove that C is transcendental.Template:Sfnp

Alternatively, one may express the partial quotients in the continued fraction expansion of Cahen's constant through the terms of Sylvester's sequence: To see this, we prove by induction on n≥1 that 1+anan+1=sn−1. Indeed, we have 1+a1a2=2=s0, and if 1+anan+1=sn−1 holds for some n≥1, then

1+an+1an+2=1+an+1⋅an(1+anan+1)=1+anan+1+(anan+1)2=sn−1+(sn−1−1)2=sn−12−sn−1+1=sn,where we used the recursion for (an)n≥0 in the first step respectively the recursion for (sn)n≥0 in the final step. As a consequence, an+2=an⋅sn−1 holds for every n≥1, from which it is easy to conclude that

C=[0;1,1,1,s02,s12,(s0s2)2,(s1s3)2,(s0s2s4)2,…].

Best approximation order

Cahen's constant C has best approximation order q−3. That means, there exist constants K1,K2>0 such that the inequality 0<|C−pq|<K1q3 has infinitely many solutions (p,q)∈ℤ×ℕ, while the inequality 0<|C−pq|<K2q3 has at most finitely many solutions (p,q)∈ℤ×ℕ. This implies (but is not equivalent to) the fact that C has irrationality measure 3, which was first observed by Template:Harvtxt.

To give a proof, denote by (pn/qn)n≥0 the sequence of convergents to Cahen's constant (that means, qn−1=an for every n≥1).[1]

But now it follows from an+2=an⋅sn−1and the recursion for (sn)n≥0 that

an+2an+12=an⋅sn−1an−12⋅sn−22=anan−12⋅sn−22−sn−2+1sn−12=anan−12⋅(1−1sn−1+1sn−12)

for every n≥1. As a consequence, the limits

α:=limn→∞q2n+1q2n2=∏n=0∞(1−1s2n+1s2n2) and β:=limn→∞q2n+2q2n+12=2⋅∏n=0∞(1−1s2n+1+1s2n+12)

(recall that s0=2) both exist by basic properties of infinite products, which is due to the absolute convergence of ∑n=0∞|1sn−1sn2|. Numerically, one can check that 0<α<1<β<2. Thus the well-known inequality

1qn(qn+qn+1)≤|C−pnqn|≤1qnqn+1

yields

|C−p2n+1q2n+1|≤1q2n+1q2n+2=1q2n+13⋅q2n+2q2n+12<1q2n+13 and |C−pnqn|≥1qn(qn+qn+1)>1qn(qn+2qn2)≥13qn3

for all sufficiently large n. Therefore C has best approximation order 3 (with K1=1 and K2=1/3), where we use that any solution (p,q)∈ℤ×ℕ to

0<|C−pq|<13q3

is necessarily a convergent to Cahen's constant.

Notes

Template:Notelist Template:Reflist

References

Template:Irrational number