Bridgeland stability condition

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, and especially algebraic geometry, a Bridgeland stability condition, defined by Tom Bridgeland, is an algebro-geometric stability condition defined on elements of a triangulated category. The case of original interest and particular importance is when this triangulated category is the derived category of coherent sheaves on a Calabi–Yau manifold, and this situation has fundamental links to string theory and the study of D-branes.

Such stability conditions were introduced in a rudimentary form by Michael Douglas called Π-stability and used to study BPS B-branes in string theory.[1] This concept was made precise by Bridgeland, who phrased these stability conditions categorically, and initiated their study mathematically.[2]

Definition

The definitions in this section are presented as in the original paper of Bridgeland, for arbitrary triangulated categories.[2] Let 𝒟 be a triangulated category.

Slicing of triangulated categories

A slicing 𝒫 of 𝒟 is a collection of full additive subcategories 𝒫(φ) for each φ such that

  • 𝒫(φ)[1]=𝒫(φ+1) for all φ, where [1] is the shift functor on the triangulated category,
  • if φ1>φ2 and A𝒫(φ1) and B𝒫(φ2), then Hom(A,B)=0, and
  • for every object E𝒟 there exists a finite sequence of real numbers φ1>φ2>>φn and a collection of triangles
Template:Clear
with Ai𝒫(φi) for all i.

The last property should be viewed as axiomatically imposing the existence of Harder–Narasimhan filtrations on elements of the category 𝒟.

Stability conditions

A Bridgeland stability condition on a triangulated category 𝒟 is a pair (Z,𝒫) consisting of a slicing 𝒫 and a group homomorphism Z:K(𝒟), where K(𝒟) is the Grothendieck group of 𝒟, called a central charge, satisfying

  • if 0E𝒫(φ) then Z(E)=m(E)exp(iπφ) for some strictly positive real number m(E)>0.

It is convention to assume the category 𝒟 is essentially small, so that the collection of all stability conditions on 𝒟 forms a set Stab(𝒟). In good circumstances, for example when 𝒟=𝒟bCoh(X) is the derived category of coherent sheaves on a complex manifold X, this set actually has the structure of a complex manifold itself.

Technical remarks about stability condition

It is shown by Bridgeland that the data of a Bridgeland stability condition is equivalent to specifying a bounded t-structure 𝒫(>0) on the category 𝒟 and a central charge Z:K(𝒜) on the heart 𝒜=𝒫((0,1]) of this t-structure which satisfies the Harder–Narasimhan property above.[2]

An element E𝒜 is semi-stable (resp. stable) with respect to the stability condition (Z,𝒫) if for every surjection EF for F𝒜, we have φ(E)(resp.<)φ(F) where Z(E)=m(E)exp(iπφ(E)) and similarly for F.

Examples

From the Harder–Narasimhan filtration

Recall the Harder–Narasimhan filtration for a smooth projective curve

X

implies for any coherent sheaf

E

there is a filtration

0=E0E1En=E

such that the factors

Ej/Ej1

have slope

μi=deg/rank

. We can extend this filtration to a bounded complex of sheaves

E

by considering the filtration on the cohomology sheaves

Ei=Hi(E)[+i]

and defining the slope of

Eji=μi+j

, giving a function

ϕ:K(X)

for the central charge.

Elliptic curves

There is an analysis by Bridgeland for the case of Elliptic curves. He finds[2][3] there is an equivalence

Stab(X)/Aut(X)GL+(2,)/SL(2,)

where

Stab(X)

is the set of stability conditions and

Aut(X)

is the set of autoequivalences of the derived category

Db(X)

.

References

Template:Reflist

Papers

  1. Douglas, M.R., Fiol, B. and Römelsberger, C., 2005. Stability and BPS branes. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2005(09), p. 006.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Template:Cite arXiv
  3. Template:Cite arXiv