Borsuk's conjecture

The Borsuk problem in geometry, for historical reasonsTemplate:Refn incorrectly called Borsuk's conjecture, is a question in discrete geometry. It is named after Karol Borsuk.
Problem
In 1932, Karol Borsuk showed[1] that an ordinary 3-dimensional ball in Euclidean space can be easily dissected into 4 solids, each of which has a smaller diameter than the ball, and generally Template:Mvar-dimensional ball can be covered with Template:Math compact sets of diameters smaller than the ball. At the same time he proved that Template:Mvar subsets are not enough in general. The proof is based on the Borsuk–Ulam theorem. That led Borsuk to a general question:[1]
The question was answered in the positive in the following cases:
- Template:Math — which is the original result by Karol Borsuk (1932).
- Template:Math — shown by Julian Perkal (1947),[2] and independently, 8 years later, by H. G. Eggleston (1955).[3] A simple proof was found later by Branko Grünbaum and Aladár Heppes.
- For all Template:Mvar for smooth convex fields — shown by Hugo Hadwiger (1946).[4][5]
- For all Template:Mvar for centrally-symmetric fields — shown by A.S. Riesling (1971).[6]
- For all Template:Mvar for fields of revolution — shown by Boris Dekster (1995).[7]
The problem was finally solved in 1993 by Jeff Kahn and Gil Kalai, who showed that the general answer to Borsuk's question is Template:Em.[8] They claim that their construction shows that Template:Math pieces do not suffice for Template:Math and for each Template:Math. However, as pointed out by Bernulf Weißbach,[9] the first part of this claim is in fact false. But after improving a suboptimal conclusion within the corresponding derivation, one can indeed verify one of the constructed point sets as a counterexample for Template:Math (as well as all higher dimensions up to 1560).[10]
Their result was improved in 2003 by Hinrichs and Richter, who constructed finite sets for Template:Math, which cannot be partitioned into Template:Math parts of smaller diameter.[11]
In 2013, Andriy V. Bondarenko had shown that Borsuk's conjecture is false for all Template:Math.[12] Shortly after, Thomas Jenrich derived a 64-dimensional counterexample from Bondarenko's construction, giving the best bound up to now.[13][14]
Apart from finding the minimum number Template:Mvar of dimensions such that the number of pieces Template:Math, mathematicians are interested in finding the general behavior of the function Template:Math. Kahn and Kalai show that in general (that is, for Template:Mvar sufficiently large), one needs many pieces. They also quote the upper bound by Oded Schramm, who showed that for every Template:Mvar, if Template:Mvar is sufficiently large, .[15] The correct order of magnitude of Template:Math is still unknown.[16] However, it is conjectured that there is a constant Template:Math such that Template:Math for all Template:Math.
Oded Schramm also worked in a related question, a body of constant width is said to have effective radius if , where is the unit ball in , he proved the lower bound , where is the smallest effective radius of a body of constant width 2 in and asked if there exists such that for all ,[17][18] that is if the gap between the volumes of the smallest and largest constant-width bodies grows exponentially. In 2024 a preprint by Arman, Bondarenko, Nazarov, Prymak, Radchenko reported to have answered this question in the affirmative giving a construction that satisfies .[19][20][21]
See also
- Hadwiger's conjecture on covering convex fields with smaller copies of themselves
- Kahn–Kalai conjecture
Note
References
Further reading
- Oleg Pikhurko, Algebraic Methods in Combinatorics, course notes.
- Andrei M. Raigorodskii, The Borsuk partition problem: the seventieth anniversary, Mathematical Intelligencer 26 (2004), no. 3, 4–12.
- Template:Cite book
External links
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedHinrRicht - ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite arXiv
- ↑ Template:Cite arXiv
- ↑ Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite web