Block-stacking problem

The first nine blocks in the solution to the single-wide block-stacking problem with the overhangs indicated

In statics, the block-stacking problem (sometimes known as The Leaning Tower of Lire Template:Harv, also the book-stacking problem, or a number of other similar terms) is a puzzle concerning the stacking of blocks at the edge of a table.

Statement

The block-stacking problem is the following puzzle:

Place

$N$

identical rigid rectangular blocks in a stable stack on a table edge in such a way as to maximize the overhang.

Template:Harvtxt provide a long list of references on this problem going back to mechanics texts from the middle of the 19th century.

Variants

Single-wide

The single-wide problem involves having only one block at any given level. In the ideal case of perfectly rectangular blocks, the solution to the single-wide problem is that the maximum overhang is given by ${\sum }_{i=1}^N\frac{1}{2i}$ times the width of a block. This sum is one half of the corresponding partial sum of the harmonic series. Because the harmonic series diverges, the maximal overhang tends to infinity as $N$ increases, meaning that it is possible to achieve any arbitrarily large overhang, with sufficient blocks. Template:Div flex row

N	Maximum overhang
	expressed as a fraction		decimal	relative size
1	1	/2	Template:Bartable
2	3	/4	Template:Bartable
3	11	/12	~Template:Bartable
4	25	/24	~Template:Bartable
5	137	/120	~Template:Bartable
6	49	/40	Template:Bartable
7	363	/280	~Template:Bartable
8	761	/560	~Template:Bartable
9	7 129	/5 040	~Template:Bartable
10	7 381	/5 040	~Template:Bartable

N	Maximum overhang
	expressed as a fraction		decimal	relative size
11	83 711	/55 440	~Template:Bartable
12	86 021	/55 440	~Template:Bartable
13	1 145 993	/720 720	~Template:Bartable
14	1 171 733	/720 720	~Template:Bartable
15	1 195 757	/720 720	~Template:Bartable
16	2 436 559	/1 441 440	~Template:Bartable
17	42 142 223	/24 504 480	~Template:Bartable
18	14 274 301	/8 168 160	~Template:Bartable
19	275 295 799	/155 195 040	~Template:Bartable
20	55 835 135	/31 039 008	~Template:Bartable

N	Maximum overhang
	expressed as a fraction		decimal	relative size
21	18 858 053	/10 346 336	~Template:Bartable
22	19 093 197	/10 346 336	~Template:Bartable
23	444 316 699	/237 965 728	~Template:Bartable
24	1 347 822 955	/713 897 184	~Template:Bartable
25	34 052 522 467	/17 847 429 600	~Template:Bartable
26	34 395 742 267	/17 847 429 600	~Template:Bartable
27	312 536 252 003	/160 626 866 400	~Template:Bartable
28	315 404 588 903	/160 626 866 400	~Template:Bartable
29	9 227 046 511 387	/4 658 179 125 600	~Template:Bartable
30	9 304 682 830 147	/4 658 179 125 600	~Template:Bartable

The number of blocks required to reach at least $N$ block-lengths past the edge of the table is 4, 31, 227, 1674, 12367, 91380, ... Template:OEIS.

Multi-wide

Comparison of the solutions to the single-wide (top) and multi-wide (bottom) block-stacking problem with three blocks

Multi-wide stacks using counterbalancing can give larger overhangs than a single width stack. Even for three blocks, stacking two counterbalanced blocks on top of another block can give an overhang of 1, while the overhang in the simple ideal case is at most Template:Sfrac. As Template:Harvtxt showed, asymptotically, the maximum overhang that can be achieved by multi-wide stacks is proportional to the cube root of the number of blocks, in contrast to the single-wide case in which the overhang is proportional to the logarithm of the number of blocks. However, it has been shown that in reality this is impossible and the number of blocks that we can move to the right, due to block stress, is not more than a specified number. For example, for a special brick with Template:Mvar = Template:Val, Young's modulus Template:Mvar = Template:Val and density Template:Mvar = Template:Val and limiting compressive stress Template:Val, the approximate value of Template:Mvar will be 853 and the maximum tower height becomes Template:Val.

Proof of solution of single-wide variant

The above formula for the maximum overhang of $n$ blocks, each with length $l$ and mass $m$, stacked one at a level, can be proven by induction by considering the torques on the blocks about the edge of the table they overhang. The blocks can be modelled as point-masses located at the center of each block, assuming uniform mass-density. In the base case ($n=1$), the center of mass of the block lies above the table's edge, meaning an overhang of $l/2$. For $k$ blocks, the center of mass of the $k$-block system must lie above the table's edge, and the center of mass of the $k-1$ top blocks must lie above the edge of the first for static equilibrium. If the $k$th block overhangs the $(k-1)$th by $l/2$ and the overhang of the first is $x$,

$(k-1)mgx=(l/2-x)mg⟹x=l/2k,$

where $g$ denotes the gravitational field. If the $k-1$ top blocks overhang their center of mass by $y$, then, by assuming the inductive hypothesis, the maximum overhang off the table is

$y+\frac{l}{2k}=\sum _{i=1}^{k}l/2i⟹y=\sum _{i=1}^{k-1}l/2i.$

For $k+1$ blocks, $y$ denotes how much the $k+1-1$ top blocks overhang their center of mass $(y=\sum _{i=1}^{k}l/2i)$, and $x=\frac{l}{2(k+1)}$. Then, the maximum overhang would be:

$\frac{l}{2(k+1)}+\sum _{i=1}^{k}l/2i=\sum _{i=1}^{k+1}l/2i.$

Mike Paterson's method to increase the overhang of 16 blocks of unit width and breadth b to 2Template:Sqrt by offsetting the blocks perpendicular to their lengths in a diamond formation 

Robustness

Template:Harvtxt discusses this problem, shows that it is robust to nonidealizations such as rounded block corners and finite precision of block placing, and introduces several variants including nonzero friction forces between adjacent blocks.

References

• Template:Cite journal.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite arXiv

External links

• Template:MathWorld
• Template:Cite web