Blackwell's contraction mapping theorem

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

In mathematics, Blackwell's contraction mapping theorem provides a set of sufficient conditions for an operator to be a contraction mapping. It is widely used in areas that rely on dynamic programming as it facilitates the proof of existence of fixed points. The result is due to David Blackwell who published it [1] in 1965 in the Annals of Mathematical Statistics.

Statement of the Theorem

Let T be an operator defined over an ordered normed vector space X. T:X→X is a contraction mapping with modulus β if it satisfies

  1. (monotonicity)u≤v⟹Tu≤Tv
  2. (discounting)T(u+c)≤Tu+βc.

Proof of the Theorem

For all u and v∈X, u≤v+||v−u||. Properties 1. and 2. imply that T(v)≤T(u+||v−u||)≤T(u)+β||v−u||, hence, T(v)−T(u)≤β||v−u||. Therefore ||T(v)−T(u)||≤β||v−u|| and T is a contraction mapping.

Illustration

If X is the real line with the usual order structure and T:X→X is a differentiable map satisfying 0≤T′(x)≤β<1, then T satisfies the assumption because T′(x)>0 is equivalent to monotonicity and because the derivative assumption implies with the fundamental theorem of calculus that the discounting assumption T(u+c)=T(u)+∫0cT′(t)dt≤∫0cβdt=Tu+βc holds. The conclusion of the Blackwell's contraction mapping theorem is that T is a contraction. While this is not an impressive conclusion in the context of calculus, it is notable that the theorem does not make any differentiability assumption. The discounting assumption however implies that T is Lipschitz continuous.

Applications

The cake eating problem

An agent has access to only one cake for its entire, infinite, life. It has to decide the optimal way to consume it. It evaluates a consumption plan, ct, by using a separable utility function, ∑t=0∞βtct1−σ1−σ, with discounting factor β∈(0,1). Its problem can be summarized as

maxct∑t=0∞βtct1−σ1−σ subject to xt=xt−1−ct, x−1=1, ct≥0 and xt≥0∀t∈ℤ+. (Template:EquationRef)

Applying Bellman's principle of optimality we find (Template:EquationNote)'s corresponding Bellman equation

V(c)=maxc′∈[0,c]c′1−σ1−σ+βV(c−c′). (Template:EquationRef)

It can be proven that the solution to this functional equation, if it exists, is equivalent to the solution of (Template:EquationNote).[2] To prove its existence we can resort to Blackwell's sufficient conditions.

Define the operator T(V(c))=supc′c1−σ1−σ+βV(c−c′). A solution to (Template:EquationNote) is equivalent to finding a fixed-point for our operator. If we prove that this operator is a contraction mapping then we can use Banach's fixed-point theorem, and conclude that there is indeed a solution to (Template:EquationNote).

Note that T is defined over the space X of bounded functions on [0,1], and maps bounded functions to bounded functions. Notice that the desired value function for our problem is clearly bounded. Endowing X with the sup-norm we conclude that the domain and co-domain are ordered normed vector spaces. We are just left with verifying that the conditions for Blackwell's theorem are respected:

  1. (monotonicity) if V(c)≥U(c)∀c∈[0,1] then T(V(c))=maxc′c′1−σ1−σ+βV(c−c′)≥maxc′c′1−σ1−σ+βU(c−c′)=T(U(c))
  2. (discounting) T(V(c)+a)=maxc′c′1−σ1−σ+β(V(c−c′)+a)≤maxc′c′1−σ1−σ+βV(c−c′)+βa=T(V(c))+βa where a is a constant function.

References

Template:Reflist