Bivariant theory

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, a bivariant theory was introduced by Fulton and MacPherson Template:Harv, in order to put a ring structure on the Chow group of a singular variety, the resulting ring called an operational Chow ring.

On technical levels, a bivariant theory is a mix of a homology theory and a cohomology theory. In general, a homology theory is a covariant functor from the category of spaces to the category of abelian groups, while a cohomology theory is a contravariant functor from the category of (nice) spaces to the category of rings. A bivariant theory is a functor both covariant and contravariant; hence, the name “bivariant”.

Definition

Unlike a homology theory or a cohomology theory, a bivariant class is defined for a map not a space.

Let f:XY be a map. For such a map, we can consider the fiber square

XYXY

(for example, a blow-up.) Intuitively, the consideration of all the fiber squares like the above can be thought of as an approximation of the map f.

Now, a birational class of f is a family of group homomorphisms indexed by the fiber squares:

AkYAkpX

satisfying the certain compatibility conditions.

Operational Chow ring

Template:Expand section The basic question was whether there is a cycle map:

A*(X)H*(X,).

If X is smooth, such a map exists since A*(X) is the usual Chow ring of X. Template:Harv has shown that rationally there is no such a map with good properties even if X is a linear variety, roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes that Voevodsky's motivic cohomology ring is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)

References

Template:Reflist Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend