Aquilanti–Mundim deformed Arrhenius model

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In chemical kinetics, the Aquilanti–Mundim deformed Arrhenius model is a generalization of the standard Arrhenius law.

Overview

Arrhenius plots, which are used to represent the effects of temperature on the rates of chemical and biophysical processes and on various transport phenomena in materials science, may exhibit deviations from linearity. Account of curvature is provided here by a formula, which involves a deformation of the exponential function, of the kind recently encountered in treatments of non-extensivity in statistical mechanics.

Theoretical model

Svante Arrhenius (1889) equation is often used to characterize the effect of temperature on the rates of chemical reactions.[1] The Arrhenius formula gave a simple and powerful law, which in a vast generality of cases describes the dependence on absolute temperature T of the rate constant as following,

k(T)=AeEo/RT (1)

where T is the absolute temperature, R is the gas constant and the factor A varies only slightly with temperature. The meaning attached to the energy of activation Eo is as the minimum energy, which molecules need have to overcome the threshold to reaction. Therefore, the year 1889 can be considered as the birth date of reactive dynamics as the study of the motion of atoms and molecules in a reactive event. Eq. (1) was motivated by the 1884 discovery by van't Hoff [2] of the exponential dependence from the temperature of the equilibrium constants for most reactions: Eq.(1), when used for both a reaction and its inverse, agrees with van't Hoff's equation interpreting chemical equilibrium as dynamical at the microscopic level. In case of a single rate-limited thermally activated process, an Arrhenius plot gives a straight line, from which the activation energy and the pre-exponential factor can both be determined.

However, advances in experimental and theoretical methods have revealed the existence of deviation from Arrhenius behavior (Fig.1).

Fig.1 Arrhenius plot as a function of d parameter. The Arrhenius plot concavity is depending on the value of the d parameter.

To overcome this problem, Aquilanti and Mundim[3] proposed (2010) a generalized Arrhenius law based on algebraic deformation of the usual exponential function. Starting from the Euler[4] exponential definition given by,

ex=limn+(1+xn)n                (2)

defining the deformed exponential function as,

edx(1+dx)1/d                             (3)

Identifying the deformation parameter d as a continuous generalization of 1n . At the limit d0 the d-exponential function, edx, coincides with the usual exponential according to the well-known limit due to Euler, that is,

limd0edx=ex                                  (4)

This definition was first used in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics by Landau.[5] In the most recent scientific literature, there is a variety of deformed algebras with applications in different areas of science.[6][7] Considering the d-exponential function, we introduce the deformed reaction rate coefficient, kd(T), in the following way,

  kd(T)=AedEoRT=A(1dEoRT)1/d                     (5)
Fig.1a Aquilanti-Mundim plot as a function of d parameter. At the limit d0 the usual Arrhenius Plot is recovered. At d=0 is Usual Arrhenius, d<0 is concave and at d>0 convex plot.

and at the limit d0 the usual Arrhenius reaction law is recovered (Figs.1 and 1a). A is pre-exponential factor. Taking the logarithm of kd(T), Eq.(5), we obtain the following expression for the non-Arrhenius plot,

lnkd(T)=lnA+1dln(1dEoRT)                      (6)

The logarithm of the reaction rate coefficient against reciprocal temperature shows a curvature, rather than the straight-line behavior described by the usual Arrhenius law (Figs.1 and 1a).

In Tolman’s[8] definition the barrier or activation energy is a phenomenological quantity defined in terms of the slope of an Arrhenius law; it is usually assumed to be independent of absolute temperature (T), requires only local equilibrium and in general is given by

Eo=lnk(T)(1RT)                                     (7)

where Eo is constant and R is the ideal gas constant. To generalize Tolman´s definition, in the case chemical reactions, we assume that the barrier or activation energy is a function of the temperature given by the following differential equation,

Ea=lnkd(T)(1RT)=Eo(1dEoRT)1 or 1Ea=1E0dRTγ(T)=γodβ   (8)

where Ea=Eo (constant) at limit d0 and the usual activation energy law is recovered as a constant. Noticeably, on the contrary of the usual Arrhenius case, the barrier or activation energy is temperature dependent and kd(T) has different concavities depending on the value of the d parameter (see Figs.1 and 1a). Thus, a positive convexity means that Ea decreases with increasing temperature. This general result is explained by a new Tolman-like interpretation of the activation energy through Eq.(8).

In the recent literature, it is possible to find different applications to verify the applicability of this new chemical reaction formalism[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

Fig.2 – Reaction rate coefficient and activation energy equations, in both theories.

Apparent Reciprocal Activation Energy or Transitivity

Ea can be considered as temperature dependent. It was postulated as the basic expansion the reciprocal-activation reciprocal-temperature relationship, for which can provide a formal mathematical justification by Tolman Theorem. The Ea(T) function when written as the logarithmic derivative of the rate constants with respect to β=1RT, Eq. (7), the concept to an activation energy represents an energetic obstacle to the progress of the reaction: therefore its reciprocal can be interpreted as a measure of the propensity for the reaction to proceed and defined as the specific transitivity (γ) of the process:

γ(β)=1Ea(T)     (9)

This notation emphasizes the fact that in general the transitivity can take a gamma of values, but not including abrupt changes e.g. in the mechanism or in the phases of reactants. If it is admit a Laurent expansion in a neighbourhood around a reference value, it is possible recover the Eqs. (6) and (8).[19]

What it is call the sub-Arrhenius behaviour would be accounted for traditionally by introducing a tunnelling parameter (κ) in the conventional Transition-State-Theory. In the d-TST formulation, it is replace the factor κ.exp(Eoβ) in the TST rate constant by the deformed exponential function, Eq. (3), yielding:[18]

kdTST=kBThQQr(1dEoβ)1/d     (10)

where h is Planck constant, kB is Boltzmann constant and Qr is the (translational, vibrational and rotational) partition functions of the reactants, and Q is the partition function of the activated complex. In Ref.,[11] the significance of the parameter d and an explicit procedure for its calculation were proposed, which it is inversely proportional to the square of the barrier height (Eo)and directly proportional to the square of the frequency for crossing the barrier (ν) at a saddle point in the potential energy surface:

d=13(hν2Eo)2     (11)

This theory was initially developed for applications in chemical kinetics problems as above discussed, but has since been applied to a wide range of phenomena:

  • the characterization of reaction rates in Chemistry,[20]
  • Transition state theory (TST),[21][22]
  • Astrochemical process,[23]
  • quantum tunneling,[24][25]
  • stereodynamics stereochemistry of kinetics processes, solid-state diffusive reactions,[9]
  • physical processes in supercooled liquids,[26][27]
  • carbon nanotubes composite,[28]
  • transport phenomena,[29][30]
  • anomalous diffusion,[31]
  • Brownian particles moving,[32]
  • transport dynamics in ionic conductors,[33]
  • a continuum approach for modeling gravitational effects on grain settling and shape distortion,[34]
  • collision theory,[35]
  • rate theory connecting kinetics to thermodynamics,[36][37]
  • nonextensive statistical mechanics,[38][39]
  • different fields of plasma chemical-physics,[40]
  • modelling of high-temperature dark current in multi-quantum well structures from MWIR to VLWI,[41]
  • molecular semiconductor problems,[42]
  • Metallurgy: perspectives on lubricant additive corrosion,[43]
  • Langevin stochastic dynamics,[44]
  • predicting solubility of solids in supercritical solvents,[45]
  • survey on operational perishables (food) quality control and logistics,[46][47][48]
  • activation energy’s on biodiesel reaction,[49][50][51]
  • flux over population analysis,[52]
  • molecular quantum mechanics,[53][54][55]
  • biological activity,[56]
  • drug design,[57]
  • protein folding.[58]
  • Motor proteins,[59]
  • Microbial growth laws,[60]
  • Water dynamics[61]
  • Classroom on Motivation and Sociability[62]
  • Virial coefficients in chemical reaction[63]
  • Diffusion in a binary colloidal mixture[64]
  • Claisen–Schmidt condensation[65]
  • Thermotherapy[66]
  • Landscape topography[67]
  • 3D-printed powder components[68]
  • Glass alloy[69]
  • Li-ion Batteries[70]

References

Template:Reflist

  1. S. Arrhenius, Z. Phys. Chem. 1889, 4, 226.
  2. J. H. van't Hoff, 1884 in his book Études de Dynamique chimique.
  3. Template:Cite journal
  4. L. Euler, Introductio in analysin infinitorum, Lugduni: Apud Bernuset, Delamolliere, Falque & soc., Editio nova., 1797.
  5. E. M. Landau, L. D.; Lifshitz, Statistal Physics, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 1951.
  6. Template:Cite journal
  7. Template:Cite journal
  8. Template:Cite journal
  9. 9.0 9.1 Template:Cite journal
  10. Template:Cite journal
  11. 11.0 11.1 Template:Cite journal
  12. Template:Cite journal
  13. Template:Cite journal
  14. Template:Cite journal
  15. Template:Cite journal
  16. K. C. Mundim and M. S. P. Mundim, Rev. Proc. Químicos. 2013, 14, 21.
  17. V. H. C. Silva, H. C. B. Oliveira and K. C. Mundim, Rev. Proc. Químicos. 2013, 14, 9.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Template:Cite journal
  19. Template:Cite journal
  20. Template:Cite journal
  21. Template:Cite journal
  22. Template:Cite journal
  23. Template:Cite journal
  24. Template:Cite journal
  25. Template:Cite journal
  26. Template:Cite journal
  27. Template:Cite journal
  28. Template:Cite journal
  29. Template:Cite journal
  30. Template:Cite journal
  31. Template:Cite journal
  32. Template:Cite journal
  33. Template:Cite journal
  34. Template:Cite journal
  35. Template:Cite journal
  36. Template:Cite journal
  37. Template:Cite journal
  38. Template:Cite journal
  39. Template:Cite journal
  40. Template:Cite journal
  41. Template:Cite journal
  42. Template:Cite journal
  43. Template:Cite book
  44. Template:Cite journal
  45. Template:Cite journal
  46. Template:Cite journal
  47. Template:Citation
  48. Template:Citation
  49. Template:Cite journal
  50. Template:Cite journal
  51. Template:Cite journal
  52. Template:Cite journal
  53. Template:Cite journal
  54. Template:Cite journal
  55. Template:Cite journal
  56. Template:Cite journal
  57. Template:Cite journal
  58. Template:Cite journal
  59. Template:Cite journal
  60. Template:Cite journal
  61. Template:Cite journal
  62. Template:Cite journal
  63. Template:Cite journal
  64. Template:Cite journal
  65. Template:Cite journal
  66. Template:Citation
  67. Template:Cite journal
  68. Template:Cite journal
  69. Template:Cite journal
  70. Template:Cite journal