Anomalous cancellation

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Image frame An anomalous cancellation or accidental cancellation is a particular kind of arithmetic procedural error that gives a numerically correct answer. An attempt is made to reduce a fraction by cancelling individual digits in the numerator and denominator. This is not a legitimate operation, and does not in general give a correct answer, but in some rare cases the result is numerically the same as if a correct procedure had been applied.[1] The trivial cases of cancelling trailing zeros or where all of the digits are equal are ignored.

Examples of anomalous cancellations which still produce the correct result include:

Template:Columns-list

These and their inverses are all the cases in base 10 with the fraction different from 1 and with two digits. The article by Boas analyzes two-digit cases in bases other than base 10, e.g., Template:Sfrac = Template:Sfrac and its inverse are the only solutions in base 4 with two digits.[2]

An example of anomalous cancellation with more than two digits is Template:Sfrac = Template:Sfrac, and an example with different numbers of digits is Template:Sfrac=Template:Sfrac.

Elementary properties

When the base is prime, no two-digit solutions exist. This can be proven by contradiction: suppose a solution exists. Without loss of generality, we can say that this solution is

a||bc||a=bc, base p,

where the double vertical line indicates digit concatenation. Thus, we have

ap+bcp+a=bc⟹(a−b)cp=b(a−c)

But p>a,b,a−c, as they are digits in base p; yet p divides b(a−c), which means that a=c. Therefore. the right hand side is zero, which means the left hand side must also be zero, i.e., a=b, a contradiction by the definition of the problem. (If a=b, the calculation becomes a||ac||a=ac⟹a||aa||a=aa=1, which is one of the excluded trivial cases.)

Another property is that the numbers of solutions in a base n is odd if and only if n is an even square. This can be proven similarly to the above: suppose that we have a solution

a||bc||a=bc

Then, doing the same manipulation, we get

an+bcn+a=bc⟹(a−b)cn=b(a−c)

Suppose that a>b,c. Then note that a,b,c→a,a−c,a−b is also a solution to the equation. This almost sets up an involution from the set of solutions to itself. But we can also substitute in to get (a−b)2n=b2, which only has solutions when n is a square. Let n=k2. Taking square roots and rearranging yields ak=(k+1)b. Since the greatest common divisor of k,(k+1) is one, we know that a=(k+1)x,b=kx. Noting that a,b<k2, this has precisely the solutions x=1,2,3,…,k−1: i.e., it has an odd number of solutions when n=k2 is an even square. The converse of the statement may be proven by noting that these solutions all satisfy the initial requirements.

The question in a bit more generality was studied by Satvik Saha, Sohom Gupta, Sayan Dutta and Sourin Chatterjee.[3] The number of solutions in different bases are listed in OEIS A366412.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

  1. ↑ Template:Mathworld
  2. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named "boas".
  3. ↑ Template:Cite journal