Adele ring

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

In number theory, the adele ring is a construction that combines all local versions of a global field into one object. For the rational numbers, these local versions include the real numbers and the fields of p-adic numbers for all prime numbers p. More generally, if K is a global field, its adele ring, often denoted 𝔸K, is a topological ring built from the completions Kv of K at all its places v. Formally, it is a restricted product of the local fields Kv, with respect to the valuation rings at the non-archimedean places. Its elements are called adeles.

The restricted product topology makes 𝔸K a locally compact topological ring. The field K embeds diagonally in 𝔸K as a discrete subring, and the quotient 𝔸K/K is compact. As an additive locally compact abelian group, the adele ring is self-dual, making it a natural setting for Fourier analysis on global fields.

The group of units of the adele ring, with its natural topology, is the idele group 𝔸K×. The quotient 𝔸K×/K×, called the idele class group, is a central object in class field theory. Adeles and ideles are also used in Tate's thesis, the theory of automorphic forms, local-global principles, and adelic descriptions of divisors, line bundles, and principal bundles on algebraic curves.

Definition

Let K be a global field, meaning either a number field or a global function field. Let v run over the places of K. For each place v, let Kv be the completion of K at v. If v is non-archimedean, let 𝒪v be the corresponding valuation ring.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The set of finite adeles of K, denoted 𝔸K,fin, is the restricted product of the non-archimedean completions Kv with respect to the subrings 𝒪v:

𝔸K,fin=∏v′∤∞Kv={(xv)v∈∏v∤∞Kv:xv∈𝒪v for all but finitely many v}.

It is equipped with the restricted product topology. A basis of open sets is given by products

∏v∈EUv×∏v∉E𝒪v,

where E is a finite set of non-archimedean places and each Uv is open in Kv. With componentwise addition and multiplication, 𝔸K,fin is a topological ring.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The adele ring of K, denoted 𝔸K, is obtained by adjoining the completions at the archimedean places:

𝔸K=𝔸K,fin×∏v∣∞Kv=∏v′∤∞Kv×∏v∣∞Kv.

The number of archimedean places is finite, and each archimedean completion is isomorphic to ℝ or ℂ. The elements of 𝔸K are called adeles of K. Addition and multiplication are defined componentwise. For brevity, one often writes

𝔸K=∏v′Kv,

with the understanding that the restricted product condition applies only at the non-archimedean places.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

If K is a global function field, then there are no archimedean places, so 𝔸K=𝔸K,fin.

There is a natural diagonal embedding

K↪𝔸K,a↦(a,a,…).

This map is well-defined because an element a∈K lies in 𝒪v for all but finitely many non-archimedean places v. After this embedding, K is regarded as a subring of 𝔸K, and its elements are sometimes called the principal adeles of 𝔸K.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

More generally, if S is a set of places of K, one may define the ring of S-adeles by

𝔸K,S:=∏v′∈SKv,

again using the valuation rings 𝒪v at the non-archimedean places in S. If

𝔸KS:=∏v′∉SKv,

then there is a natural product decomposition

𝔸K≅𝔸K,S×𝔸KS.

Motivation

The purpose of the adele ring is to look at all completions of a global field K at once. For the rational numbers, the usual absolute value gives the completion ℝ, but Ostrowski's theorem shows that there are also the p-adic absolute values, one for each prime number p. More generally, a global field has a family of completions Kv, one for each place v. The adele ring packages these completions into a single object, so that analytic methods can be applied while still retaining arithmetic information from all finite primes.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

A precursor to this point of view is Minkowski's geometry of numbers. If K is a number field with ring of integers 𝒪K, the classical Minkowski embedding places 𝒪K as a lattice in the finite-dimensional real vector space

K⊗ℚℝ≅ℝr×ℂs.

This makes it possible to study arithmetic questions using volume and compactness arguments. The adele ring may be viewed as a local-global enlargement of this construction: instead of using only the archimedean completions, it includes all completions of K. In the adelic setting, the global field K itself embeds diagonally as a discrete subgroup of 𝔸K, and the quotient 𝔸K/K is compact.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The adele ring is defined as a restricted product rather than as the full Cartesian product of all completions. The restricted product condition says that an adele is integral at almost all non-archimedean places. This condition is natural from the point of view of the global field itself: if a∈K, then a belongs to 𝒪v for all but finitely many finite places v. Thus the diagonal embedding

K↪𝔸K

lands in the restricted product.

The restricted product is also the topological condition that makes the adele ring useful for analysis. With its restricted product topology, 𝔸K is a locally compact topological ring. Local compactness gives the additive group of 𝔸K a Haar measure, making it possible to do harmonic analysis on the adele ring. This is one of the main reasons adeles are useful in modern number theory.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Tate's thesis, for example, constructs Fourier analysis on the adele ring and integration over the idele group to give a uniform treatment of Hecke L-functions. In this approach, global zeta integrals factor into local integrals over the completions Kv, and the local-global structure of the adele ring explains the Euler product, analytic continuation, and functional equation of these L-functions.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Examples

Rational adeles

For K=ℚ, Ostrowski's theorem says that the places of ℚ are given by the usual absolute value and the p-adic absolute values, one for each prime number p. The completion at the infinite place is

ℚ∞=ℝ,

and the completion at the place corresponding to p is the field of p-adic numbers ℚp, with valuation ring ℤp. Thus the adele ring of ℚ is

𝔸ℚ=ℝ×∏p′ℚp,

where the restricted product is taken with respect to the subrings ℤp. Equivalently,

𝔸ℚ={(x∞,x2,x3,x5,…):x∞∈ℝ, xp∈ℚp, xp∈ℤp for all but finitely many p}.

Thus an adele of ℚ is a real number together with a p-adic rational number for each prime p, such that all but finitely many of the p-adic components are p-adic integers.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The finite adeles of ℚ are

𝔸ℚ,fin=∏p′ℚp.

The integral finite adeles are

ℤ^=∏pℤp,

the ring of profinite integers. With this notation,

𝔸ℚ=ℝ×𝔸ℚ,fin,ℤ^⊂𝔸ℚ,fin.

The diagonal embedding of ℚ sends a rational number a to the adele

(a,a,a,…).

This is well-defined because a rational number has only finitely many prime factors in its denominator, so a∈ℤp for all but finitely many primes p.

Number fields

Let K be a number field with ring of integers 𝒪K. At each finite place v, the completion Kv is a finite extension of some ℚp, and its valuation ring is denoted 𝒪v. At each infinite place, the completion is isomorphic to either ℝ or ℂ. The adele ring is

𝔸K=∏v′∤∞Kv×∏v∣∞Kv,

where the restricted product over finite places is taken with respect to the rings 𝒪v. Thus an adele of K is a family (xv)v with xv∈Kv for every place v, such that xv∈𝒪v for all but finitely many finite places.

For example, if K is a quadratic number field, then its archimedean factor is either ℝ2, when K has two real embeddings, or ℂ, when K has one pair of complex embeddings. The finite part is a restricted product over the nonzero prime ideals of 𝒪K.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

If L/K is a finite extension of number fields, then the adelic construction is compatible with extension of scalars. In particular, one has a natural isomorphism

𝔸L≅𝔸K⊗KL,

and, in the special case K=ℚ,

𝔸L≅𝔸ℚ⊗ℚL.

This gives another way to view the adele ring of a number field as the adelic extension of the rational adele ring.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Function fields and curves

Now take the function field

K=𝔽q(ℙ1)=𝔽q(t)

of the projective line over a finite field. Its places correspond to the closed points x of X=ℙ1. Such points may be described as maps

x:Spec⁡𝔽qn⟶ℙ1

over Spec⁡𝔽q. For instance, there are q+1 points of the form

Spec⁡𝔽q⟶ℙ1.

For a point x, the local ring used in the restricted product is the completed local ring

𝒪^X,x,

and the corresponding local field is its fraction field, often denoted KX,x. Thus the adele ring of 𝔽q(ℙ1) may be written

𝔸𝔽q(ℙ1)=∏x′∈XKX,x,

where the restricted product is taken with respect to the completed local rings 𝒪^X,x. Equivalently, its elements are families (fx)x, with fx∈KX,x, such that fx∈𝒪^X,x for all but finitely many points x.Template:Sfnp

The same description holds for any smooth proper curve X/𝔽q over a finite field. If K=𝔽q(X) is its function field, then

𝔸K=∏x′∈XKX,x,

where x runs over the closed points of X. Unlike number fields, global function fields have no archimedean places, so the finite adele ring and the full adele ring are the same.

Topology and main properties

The topology on the adele ring is the restricted product topology. For a finite set of places P containing the archimedean places, define

𝔸K(P):=∏v∈PKv×∏v∉P𝒪v.

Equipped with the product topology and componentwise addition and multiplication, 𝔸K(P) is a locally compact topological ring. If P′ is another finite set of places of K containing P, then 𝔸K(P) is an open subring of 𝔸K(P′). The adele ring is the union of all these open subrings:

𝔸K=⋃P⊃P∞, |P|<∞𝔸K(P).

Equivalently, 𝔸K is the set of all x=(xv)v such that |xv|v≤1 for almost all non-archimedean places v. The topology of 𝔸K is induced by the requirement that all 𝔸K(P) be open subrings. Thus 𝔸K is a locally compact topological ring.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The same construction applies to sets of places. For every set of places S, the ring of S-adeles

𝔸K,S=∏v′∈SKv

is a locally compact topological ring, with the restricted product topology. If

𝔸KS=∏v′∉SKv,

then there is a natural product decomposition

𝔸K≅𝔸K,S×𝔸KS.

The diagonal embedding

K↪𝔸K,a↦(a,a,…)

identifies K with a subring of 𝔸K. With this embedding, the elements of K are called principal adeles. The image of K is discrete in 𝔸K, and the quotient

𝔸K/K

is compact. In particular, K is closed in 𝔸K. This compactness property is one of the main reasons the adele ring is useful in harmonic analysis and in arithmetic applications.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The adele ring also separates naturally into any chosen local factor and the remaining factors. Fix a place v of K. Let P be a finite set of places containing v and P∞, and define

𝔸K′(P,v):=∏w∈P∖{v}Kw×∏w∉P𝒪w.

Then

𝔸K(P)≅Kv×𝔸K′(P,v).

Furthermore, define

𝔸K′(v):=⋃P⊃P∞∪{v}𝔸K′(P,v),

where P runs through all finite sets containing P∞∪{v}. Then

𝔸K≅Kv×𝔸K′(v),

via the map

(aw)w↦(av,(aw)w≠v).

Thus there is a natural embedding Kv↪𝔸K and a natural projection 𝔸K↠Kv. The same construction works with any finite set of places in place of the single place v.

Since 𝔸K is locally compact as an additive group, it has an additive Haar measure. This measure is used in harmonic analysis on global fields and is usually normalized as a product of local Haar measures. With the standard normalization at the non-archimedean places, the valuation ring 𝒪v has measure 1 for almost all finite places.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Haar measure and Fourier analysis

Since 𝔸K is locally compact as an additive group, it has an additive Haar measure, usually denoted dx. This measure may be normalized as a product of local Haar measures on the completions Kv. At a non-archimedean place v, the local measure dxv is commonly normalized so that the valuation ring 𝒪v has measure 1; at the archimedean places one uses the usual Lebesgue measure on ℝ or ℂ.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

A function f:𝔸K→ℂ is called simple if

f=∏vfv,

where each fv:Kv→ℂ is measurable and fv=𝟏𝒪v for almost all non-archimedean places v. With the standard normalization, every integrable simple function satisfies

∫𝔸Kfdx=∏v∫Kvfvdxv.

The product is finite in the sense that almost all factors are equal to 1.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Fourier analysis on the adele ring is based on the characters of its additive group. If G is a locally compact abelian group, its character group G^ is the group of all continuous homomorphisms from G to

𝕋={z∈ℂ:|z|=1},

with the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets. The adele ring is self-dual as a locally compact abelian group:

𝔸K≅𝔸K^.

This is proved by reducing to the corresponding local statement for each completion Kv. For example, the usual character

e∞(t)=exp⁡(2πit)

gives an isomorphism

ℝ⟶ℝ^,s↦(t↦e∞(ts)).

Analogous local characters are used at the non-archimedean places, and their restricted product gives the global self-duality of 𝔸K.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

After choosing a nontrivial additive character χ:𝔸K→𝕋, the Fourier transform of a suitable function f on 𝔸K is defined by

f^(y)=∫𝔸Kf(x)χ(xy)dx.

With a compatible choice of Haar measure, this Fourier transform satisfies the usual inversion and Plancherel formulas. One of the important features of the adelic setting is that global Fourier analysis factors into local Fourier analysis over the completions Kv.

With the help of the characters of 𝔸K, Fourier analysis can be done on the adele ring. In Tate's thesis, John Tate used Fourier analysis on the adele ring and integration over the idele group to study the Riemann zeta function, Dirichlet L-functions, and more general Hecke L-functions. Adelic forms of these functions can be represented as integrals over the adele ring or the idele group, with respect to corresponding Haar measures. Their functional equations and meromorphic continuations can then be proved by applying Fourier analysis and Poisson summation in the adelic setting.Template:SfnpTemplate:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

For example, for Re⁡(s)>1,

∫ℤ^|x|sd×x=ζ(s),

where d×x is the multiplicative Haar measure on the finite idele group Iℚ,fin, normalized so that ℤ^× has volume 1, and extended by zero to the finite adele ring. Thus the Riemann zeta function can be written as an integral over a subset of the adele ring.Template:Sfnp

Applications

Class field theory

The adele ring enters class field theory through its group of units, the idele group 𝔸K×. The quotient

CK=𝔸K×/K×

is the idele class group of K. Global class field theory describes the abelian extensions of K in terms of topological quotients of CK. In one formulation, the global Artin reciprocity law gives a reciprocity homomorphism from the idele class group to the Galois group of the maximal abelian extension of K. At finite level, for a finite abelian extension L/K, the corresponding quotient of CK is described using the norm subgroup from CL.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

This adelic formulation packages the local reciprocity maps of local class field theory into a global statement. It replaces the older ideal-theoretic formulation, involving ideal class groups and ray class groups, by a statement about the topology and quotients of the idele class group.

Ideal classes and units

The idele group gives a topological refinement of the group of fractional ideals of a number field. For a number field K, the finite part of the idele group maps onto the group of fractional ideals by

(x𝔭)𝔭⟼∏𝔭𝔭v𝔭(x𝔭).

The kernel is the product of the local unit groups. Consequently, the ordinary ideal class group can be recovered as a quotient of the idele class group. This viewpoint gives an adelic interpretation of the finiteness of the class number: the compactness of the norm-one idele classes implies that the ideal class group is compact, and since it is discrete, it is finite.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

The same circle of ideas also gives an adelic formulation of the unit theorem. If P is a finite set of places containing the archimedean places, the group of P-units appears as an intersection of K× with a natural open subgroup of the idele group. In particular, for a number field K, Dirichlet's unit theorem states that

𝒪K×≅μ(K)×ℤr+s−1,

where μ(K) is the finite cyclic group of roots of unity in K, r is the number of real embeddings, and s is the number of conjugate pairs of complex embeddings.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Tate's thesis and L-functions

The topology on 𝔸K makes the quotient 𝔸K/K compact, allowing one to do harmonic analysis on the adele ring. With the help of the characters of 𝔸K, Fourier analysis can be done on the adele ring; integration over the idele group then gives zeta integrals.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

In Tate's thesis, John Tate used Fourier analysis on the adele ring and the idele group to study the Riemann zeta function, Dirichlet L-functions, and more general Hecke L-functions. Adelic forms of these functions can be represented as integrals over the adele ring or the idele group, with respect to corresponding Haar measures. Their functional equations and meromorphic continuations can then be proved using Fourier analysis and Poisson summation in the adelic setting.Template:SfnpTemplate:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

For example, for Re⁡(s)>1, one has an adelic integral representation of the Riemann zeta function,

∫ℤ^|x|sd×x=ζ(s),

where d×x is the multiplicative Haar measure on the finite idele group Iℚ,fin, normalized so that ℤ^× has volume 1, and extended by zero to the finite adele ring. Thus the Riemann zeta function can be written as an integral over a subset of the adele ring.

Automorphic forms

Adeles also provide the natural language for automorphic forms. Instead of studying functions separately over the real, complex, and p-adic points of an algebraic group, one studies functions on adelic groups such as G(𝔸K). For example, automorphic forms for GL2 over ℚ may be viewed as functions on

GL2(ℚ)∖GL2(𝔸ℚ)

satisfying suitable algebraic, analytic, and growth conditions. In this setting, automorphic L-functions can often be described by integrals over adelic groups.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

More generally, the use of adelic points G(𝔸K) for reductive algebraic groups G is central in the modern theory of automorphic representations. This viewpoint is also one of the starting points of the Langlands program, which relates automorphic representations of adelic groups to Galois representations.Template:Sfnp

Approximation and local-global principles

The adele ring provides a unified interpretation of approximation theorems and local-global questions. The weak approximation theorem says that, for finitely many inequivalent valuations of K, the diagonal image of K is dense in the product of the corresponding completions. The strong approximation theorem says that, after omitting one place v0, the field K is dense in the restricted product over all other places. Thus the global field is discrete in its full adele ring, but becomes dense when one place is omitted.Template:Sfnp

Adelic language is also used to formulate local-global principles, such as the Hasse principle. In such problems one compares solutions over the global field K with compatible families of solutions over all completions Kv. The adele ring provides a single space in which these local conditions can be collected and studied together.

Curves, divisors, and bundles

For a smooth proper curve X/𝔽q with function field K, the adele ring of K can be described using the completions at the closed points of X. In this setting, ideles recover the divisor and Picard groups of the curve. One has

Div⁡(X)=𝔸X×/𝕆X×

and

Pic⁡(X)=K×∖𝔸X×/𝕆X×.

Thus the divisor-class description of line bundles on a curve can be expressed adelically.

More generally, for an algebraic group G, adelic double quotients describe moduli of bundles on curves. In Weil uniformization, for suitable groups such as semisimple groups, and also for GLn, one has an adelic description of the form

BunG(X)=G(K)∖G(𝔸X)/G(𝕆X).

For G=𝔾m, this recovers the adelic description of the Picard group.

Serre duality on curves

Adeles also occur in the cohomology of algebraic curves. If X is a smooth proper curve over the complex numbers, one can define the adeles of its function field ℂ(X) in a way analogous to the function-field case over finite fields. Tate proved that Serre duality on X,

H1(X,ℒ)≃H0(X,ΩX⊗ℒ−1)∗,

can be deduced by working with this adele ring 𝔸ℂ(X), where ℒ is a line bundle on X.Template:Sfnp

Idele group

Template:Main

The idele group of a global field K is the group of invertible elements of the adele ring 𝔸K. It is usually denoted

𝔸K×

or IK. Equivalently, it is the restricted direct product

𝔸K×=∏v′Kv×

of the multiplicative groups of the completions Kv, taken with respect to the unit groups 𝒪v× at the non-archimedean places. Thus an idele is a family x=(xv)v, with xv∈Kv× for every place v, such that xv∈𝒪v× for all but finitely many non-archimedean v.

Although 𝔸K× is the group of units of the adele ring, it is not given the subspace topology inherited from 𝔸K. Instead it is given the restricted product topology, equivalently the topology induced by the embedding

𝔸K×⟶𝔸K×𝔸K,x↦(x,x−1).

With this topology, 𝔸K× is an abelian locally compact topological group.

The diagonal embedding of K× into 𝔸K× gives the subgroup of principal ideles. The quotient

CK=𝔸K×/K×

is the idele class group. This group is a central object in class field theory, where abelian extensions of K are described in terms of topological quotients of CK.

The idele group also carries a natural absolute value, or module,

|x|𝔸=∏v|xv|v,

where the local absolute values are normalized in the standard way. The product is finite for ideles, since almost all finite components are units. The subgroup

𝔸K1={x∈𝔸K×:|x|𝔸=1}

is the group of norm-one ideles. By the product formula, K× lies in 𝔸K1, and the quotient 𝔸K1/K× is compact.

For number fields, the finite part of the idele group maps naturally onto the group of fractional ideals by

(x𝔭)𝔭⟼∏𝔭𝔭v𝔭(x𝔭).

The kernel is 𝒪^K×, so the ordinary ideal class group is recovered as a quotient of the idele class group. In this way, the idele class group refines the ideal class group by retaining local unit data and archimedean information.

Ideles are also used in harmonic analysis on global fields. In Tate's thesis, integration over the adele ring and the idele group gives a uniform treatment of Hecke L-functions, including their Euler products, analytic continuation, and functional equations.

Further properties and proof sketches

The preceding sections give the basic definition and main uses of the adele ring. This section records some standard structural facts and proof sketches.

Restricted product topology

The difference between the restricted and unrestricted product topologies can be illustrated using a sequence in 𝔸ℚ.

Lemma. Consider the following sequence in 𝔸ℚ:
x1=(12,1,1,…)x2=(1,13,1,…)x3=(1,1,15,1,…)x4=(1,1,1,17,1,…)⋮
In the product topology this converges to (1,1,…), but it does not converge at all in the restricted product topology.

Proof. In product topology convergence corresponds to the convergence in each coordinate, which is trivial because the sequences become stationary. The sequence does not converge in restricted product topology. For each adele a=(ap)p∈𝔸ℚ and for each restricted open rectangle U=∏p∈EUp×∏p∉Eℤp, it has 1p−ap∉ℤp for ap∈ℤp and therefore 1p−ap∉ℤp for all p∉F. As a result, xn−a∉U for almost all n∈ℕ. In this consideration, E and F are finite subsets of the set of all places.

Alternative descriptions for number fields

The profinite integers are defined as the profinite completion of the rings ℤ/nℤ with the partial order n≥m⇔m|n, i.e.,

ℤ^:=lim←nℤ/nℤ.
Lemma. ℤ^≅∏pℤp.

Proof. This follows from the Chinese Remainder Theorem.

Lemma. 𝔸ℚ,fin=ℤ^⊗ℤℚ.

Proof. Use the universal property of the tensor product. Define a ℤ-bilinear function

{Ψ:ℤ^×ℚ→𝔸ℚ,fin((ap)p,q)↦(apq)p.

This is well-defined because for a given q=mn∈ℚ with m,n coprime there are only finitely many primes dividing n. Let M be another ℤ-module with a ℤ-bilinear map Φ:ℤ^×ℚ→M. It must be the case that Φ factors through Ψ uniquely, i.e., there exists a unique ℤ-linear map Φ~:𝔸ℚ,fin→M such that Φ=Φ~∘Ψ. Φ~ can be defined as follows: for a given (up)p there exist u∈ℕ and (vp)p∈ℤ^ such that up=1u⋅vp for all p. Define Φ~((up)p):=Φ((vp)p,1u). One can show Φ~ is well-defined, ℤ-linear, satisfies Φ=Φ~∘Ψ and is unique with these properties.

Corollary. Define 𝔸ℤ:=ℤ^×ℝ. This results in an algebraic isomorphism 𝔸ℚ≅𝔸ℤ⊗ℤℚ.

Proof.

𝔸ℤ⊗ℤℚ=(ℤ^×ℝ)⊗ℤℚ≅(ℤ^⊗ℤℚ)×(ℝ⊗ℤℚ)≅(ℤ^⊗ℤℚ)×ℝ=𝔸ℚ,fin×ℝ=𝔸ℚ.
Lemma. For a number field K, 𝔸K=𝔸ℚ⊗ℚK.

Remark. Using 𝔸ℚ⊗ℚK≅𝔸ℚ⊕…⊕𝔸ℚ, where there are [K:ℚ] summands, the right side receives the product topology and this topology is transported via the isomorphism onto 𝔸ℚ⊗ℚK.

Finite extensions

If L/K is a finite extension, then L is a global field. Thus 𝔸L is defined, and 𝔸L=∏v′Lv. The ring 𝔸K can be identified with a subring of 𝔸L. Map a=(av)v∈𝔸K to a′=(a'w)w∈𝔸L, where a'w=av∈Kv⊂Lw for w|v. Then a=(aw)w∈𝔸L is in the subring 𝔸K if aw∈Kv for w|v and aw=aw′ for all w,w′ lying above the same place v of K.

Lemma. If L/K is a finite extension, then 𝔸L≅𝔸K⊗KL both algebraically and topologically.

With the help of this isomorphism, the inclusion 𝔸K⊂𝔸L is given by

{𝔸K→𝔸Lα↦α⊗K1.

Furthermore, the principal adeles in 𝔸K can be identified with a subgroup of principal adeles in 𝔸L via the natural embedding K→L.

Proof.Template:Sfnp Let ω1,…,ωn be a basis of L over K. Then for almost all v,

Ov~≅Ovω1⊕⋯⊕Ovωn.

Furthermore, there are the following isomorphisms:

Kvω1⊕⋯⊕Kvωn≅Kv⊗KL≅Lv=∏w|vLw.

For the second use the map

{Kv⊗KL→Lvαv⊗a↦(αv⋅(τw(a)))w

in which τw:L→Lw is the canonical embedding and w|v. The restricted product is taken on both sides with respect to Ov~:

𝔸K⊗KL=(∏v′Kv)⊗KL≅∏v′(Kvω1⊕⋯⊕Kvωn)≅∏v′(Kv⊗KL)≅∏v′Lv=𝔸L.
Corollary. As additive groups 𝔸L≅𝔸K⊕⋯⊕𝔸K, where the right side has [L:K] summands.

The set of principal adeles in 𝔸L is identified with the set K⊕⋯⊕K, where the left side has [L:K] summands and K is considered as a subset of 𝔸K.

Adeles of vector spaces and algebras

Let E be a finite-dimensional vector space over K and {ω1,…,ωn} a basis for E over K. For each place v of K:

Ev:=E⊗KKv≅Kvω1⊕⋯⊕Kvωn,Ov~:=Ovω1⊕⋯⊕Ovωn.

The adele ring of E is defined as

𝔸E:=∏v′Ev.

This definition is based on the alternative description of the adele ring as a tensor product equipped with the same topology that was defined when giving an alternate definition of the adele ring for number fields. Next, 𝔸E is equipped with the restricted product topology. Then 𝔸E=E⊗K𝔸K and E is embedded in 𝔸E naturally via the map e↦e⊗1.

An alternative definition of the topology on 𝔸E can be provided. Consider all linear maps E→K. Using the natural embeddings E→𝔸E and K→𝔸K, extend these linear maps to 𝔸E→𝔸K. The topology on 𝔸E is the coarsest topology for which all these extensions are continuous.

The topology can be defined in a different way. Fixing a basis for E over K results in an isomorphism E≅Kn. Therefore, fixing a basis induces an isomorphism (𝔸K)n≅𝔸E. The left-hand side is supplied with the product topology and this topology is transported with the isomorphism onto the right-hand side. The topology does not depend on the choice of the basis, because another basis defines a second isomorphism. By composing both isomorphisms, a linear homeomorphism which transfers the two topologies into each other is obtained. More formally,

𝔸E=E⊗K𝔸K≅(K⊗K𝔸K)⊕⋯⊕(K⊗K𝔸K)≅𝔸K⊕⋯⊕𝔸K,

where the sums have n summands. In case of E=L, the definition above is consistent with the results about the adele ring of a finite extension L/K.Template:Sfnp

Let A be a finite-dimensional algebra over K. In particular, A is a finite-dimensional vector space over K. As a consequence, 𝔸A is defined and 𝔸A≅𝔸K⊗KA. Since there is multiplication on 𝔸K and A, a multiplication on 𝔸A can be defined via

∀α,β∈𝔸K and ∀a,b∈A:(α⊗Ka)⋅(β⊗Kb):=(αβ)⊗K(ab).

As a consequence, 𝔸A is an algebra with a unit over 𝔸K. Let ℬ be a finite subset of A, containing a basis for A over K. For any finite place v, Mv is defined as the Ov-module generated by ℬ in Av. For each finite set of places P⊃P∞, define

𝔸A(P,α)=∏v∈PAv×∏v∉PMv.

One can show there is a finite set P0 so that 𝔸A(P,α) is an open subring of 𝔸A, if P⊃P0. Furthermore 𝔸A is the union of all these subrings and for A=K, the definition above is consistent with the definition of the adele ring.

Trace and norm

Let L/K be a finite extension. Since 𝔸K=𝔸K⊗KK and 𝔸L=𝔸K⊗KL from the lemma above, 𝔸K can be interpreted as a closed subring of 𝔸L. For this embedding, write conL/K. Explicitly, for all places w of L above v and for any α∈𝔸K,

(conL/K(α))w=αv∈Kv.

Let M/L/K be a tower of global fields. Then

conM/K(α)=conM/L(conL/K(α))∀α∈𝔸K.

Furthermore, restricted to the principal adeles con is the natural injection K→L.

Let {ω1,…,ωn} be a basis of the field extension L/K. Then each α∈𝔸L can be written as ∑j=1nαjωj, where αj∈𝔸K are unique. The map α↦αj is continuous. Define αij, depending on α, via the equations

αω1=∑j=1nα1jωj,⋮αωn=∑j=1nαnjωj.

Now define the trace and norm of α as

TrL/K(α):=Tr⁡((αij)i,j)=∑i=1nαii,NL/K(α):=N((αij)i,j)=det⁡((αij)i,j).

These are the trace and the determinant of the linear map

{𝔸L→𝔸Lx↦αx.

They are continuous maps on the adele ring, and they fulfil the usual equations:

TrL/K(α+β)=TrL/K(α)+TrL/K(β)∀α,β∈𝔸L,TrL/K(con⁡(α))=nα∀α∈𝔸K,NL/K(αβ)=NL/K(α)NL/K(β)∀α,β∈𝔸L,NL/K(con⁡(α))=αn∀α∈𝔸K.

Furthermore, for α∈L, TrL/K(α) and NL/K(α) are identical to the trace and norm of the field extension L/K. For a tower of fields M/L/K, the result is

TrL/K(TrM/L(α))=TrM/K(α)∀α∈𝔸M,NL/K(NM/L(α))=NM/K(α)∀α∈𝔸M.

Moreover, it can be proven that:Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

TrL/K(α)=(∑w|vTrLw/Kv(αw))v∀α∈𝔸L,NL/K(α)=(∏w|vNLw/Kv(αw))v∀α∈𝔸L.

Discreteness and compactness of the diagonal image

Theorem.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp K is discrete and cocompact in 𝔸K. In particular, K is closed in 𝔸K.

Proof. Prove the case K=ℚ. To show ℚ⊂𝔸ℚ is discrete it is sufficient to show the existence of a neighbourhood of 0 which contains no other rational number. The general case follows via translation. Define

U:={(αp)p:∀p<∞, |αp|p≤1and|α∞|∞<1}=ℤ^×(−1,1).

U is an open neighbourhood of 0∈𝔸ℚ. It is claimed that U∩ℚ={0}. Let β∈U∩ℚ. Then β∈ℚ and |β|p≤1 for all p, and therefore β∈ℤ. Additionally, β∈(−1,1) and therefore β=0.

Next, to show compactness, define

W:={(αp)p:∀p<∞, |αp|p≤1and|α∞|∞≤12}=ℤ^×[−12,12].

Each element in 𝔸ℚ/ℚ has a representative in W, that is, for each α∈𝔸ℚ, there exists β∈ℚ such that α−β∈W. Let α=(αp)p∈𝔸ℚ be arbitrary and p be a prime for which |αp|>1. Then there exists rp=zp/pxp, with zp∈ℤ and xp∈ℕ, such that |αp−rp|≤1. Replace α with α−rp and let q≠p be another prime. Then

|αq−rp|q≤max⁡{|αq|q,|rp|q}≤max⁡{|αq|q,1}≤1.

Next, it can be claimed that

|αq−rp|q≤1⟺|αq|q≤1.

The reverse implication is trivially true. The implication is true because the two terms of the strong triangle inequality are equal if the absolute values of both integers are different. As a consequence, the finite set of primes for which the components of α are not in ℤp is reduced by one. With iteration, it can be deduced that there exists r∈ℚ such that α−r∈ℤ^×ℝ. Now select s∈ℤ such that α∞−r−s∈[−12,12]. Then α−(r+s)∈W. The continuous projection π:W→𝔸ℚ/ℚ is surjective, therefore 𝔸ℚ/ℚ, as the continuous image of a compact set, is compact.

Corollary. Let E be a finite-dimensional vector space over K. Then E is discrete and cocompact in 𝔸E.

Approximation theorems

Weak Approximation Theorem.Template:Sfnp Let |⋅|1,…,|⋅|N be inequivalent valuations of K. Let Kn be the completion of K with respect to |⋅|n. Embed K diagonally in K1×⋯×KN. Then K is everywhere dense in K1×⋯×KN. In other words, for each ε>0 and for each (α1,…,αN)∈K1×⋯×KN, there exists ξ∈K such that
∀n∈{1,…,N}:|αn−ξ|n<ε.
Strong Approximation Theorem.Template:Sfnp Let v0 be a place of K. Define
V:=∏v′≠v0Kv.
Then K is dense in V.

Remark. The global field is discrete in its adele ring. The strong approximation theorem tells us that, if one place or more is omitted, the property of discreteness of K is turned into a denseness of K.

Arithmetic consequences

Theorem (finiteness of the class number of a number field). Let K be a number field. Then |ClK|<∞.

Proof. The map

{IK1→JK((αv)v<∞,(αv)v|∞)↦∏v<∞𝔭vv(αv)

is surjective and therefore ClK is the continuous image of the compact set IK1/K×. Thus ClK is compact. In addition, it is discrete and so finite.

Remark. There is a similar result for the case of a global function field. In this case, the so-called divisor group is defined. It can be shown that the quotient of the set of all divisors of degree 0 by the set of the principal divisors is a finite group.Template:Sfnp

Let P⊃P∞ be a finite set of places. Define

Ω(P):=∏v∈PKv××∏v∉POv×=(𝔸K(P))×,E(P):=K×∩Ω(P).

Then E(P) is a subgroup of K×, containing all elements ξ∈K× satisfying v(ξ)=0 for all v∉P. Since K× is discrete in IK, E(P) is a discrete subgroup of Ω(P) and, with the same argument, E(P) is discrete in Ω1(P):=Ω(P)∩IK1.

An alternative definition is E(P)=K(P)×, where K(P) is a subring of K defined by

K(P):=K∩(∏v∈PKv×∏v∉POv).

As a consequence, K(P) contains all elements ξ∈K which fulfil v(ξ)≥0 for all v∉P.

Lemma. Let 0<c≤C<∞. The following set is finite:
{η∈E(P):{|ηv|v=1∀v∉P,c≤|ηv|v≤C∀v∈P.}}.

Proof. Define

W:={(αv)v:{|αv|v=1∀v∉P,c≤|αv|v≤C∀v∈P.}}.

W is compact and the set described above is the intersection of W with the discrete subgroup K× in IK and therefore finite.

Lemma. Let E be set of all ξ∈K such that |ξ|v=1 for all v. Then E=μ(K), the group of all roots of unity of K. In particular it is finite and cyclic.

Proof. All roots of unity of K have absolute value 1, so μ(K)⊂E. For the converse, note that the preceding lemma with c=C=1 and any P implies E is finite. Moreover E⊂E(P) for each finite set of places P⊃P∞. Finally, suppose there exists ξ∈E which is not a root of unity of K. Then ξn≠1 for all n∈ℕ, contradicting the finiteness of E.

Unit Theorem. E(P) is the direct product of E and a group isomorphic to ℤs, where s=0 if P=∅ and s=|P|−1 if P≠∅.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp
Dirichlet's Unit Theorem. Let K be a number field. Then
O×≅μ(K)×ℤr+s−1,

where μ(K) is the finite cyclic group of all roots of unity of K, r is the number of real embeddings of K, and s is the number of conjugate pairs of complex embeddings of K. It stands that [K:ℚ]=r+2s.

Remark. The Unit Theorem generalises Dirichlet's Unit Theorem. To see this, let K be a number field. It is already known that E=μ(K), set P=P∞ and note |P∞|=r+s. Then there is

E×ℤr+s−1=E(P∞)=K×∩(∏v|∞Kv××∏v<∞Ov×)≅K×∩(∏v<∞Ov×)≅O×.

Duality for adelic vector spaces

The self-duality of the adele ring extends to adelic vector spaces.

Theorem (algebraic and continuous duals of the adele ring).Template:Sfnp Let χ be a non-trivial character of 𝔸K, which is trivial on K. Let E be a finite-dimensional vector space over K. Let E⋆ and 𝔸E⋆ be the algebraic duals of E and 𝔸E. Denote the topological dual of 𝔸E by 𝔸E′ and use ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ and [⋅,⋅] to indicate the natural bilinear pairings on 𝔸E×𝔸E′ and 𝔸E×𝔸E⋆. Then the formula
⟨e,e′⟩=χ([e,e⋆])

for all e∈𝔸E determines an isomorphism e⋆↦e′ of 𝔸E⋆ onto 𝔸E′, where e′∈𝔸E′ and e⋆∈𝔸E⋆. Moreover, if e⋆∈𝔸E⋆ fulfils χ([e,e⋆])=1 for all e∈E, then e⋆∈E⋆.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend