Lebesgue's number lemma

From testwiki
Revision as of 21:10, 8 January 2025 by imported>Mgkrupa (Added {{Metric spaces}})
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In topology, the Lebesgue covering lemma is a useful tool in the study of compact metric spaces.

Given an open cover of a compact metric space, a Lebesgue's number of the cover is a number δ>0 such that every subset of X having diameter less than δ is contained in some member of the cover.

The existence of Lebesgue's numbers for compact metric spaces is given by the Lebesgue's covering lemma:

If the metric space (X,d) is compact and an open cover of X is given, then the cover admits some Lebesgue's number δ>0.

The notion of Lebesgue's numbers itself is useful in other applications as well.

Proof

Direct Proof

Let 𝒰 be an open cover of X. Since X is compact we can extract a finite subcover {A1,,An}𝒰. If any one of the Ai's equals X then any δ>0 will serve as a Lebesgue's number. Otherwise for each i{1,,n}, let Ci:=XAi, note that Ci is not empty, and define a function f:X by

f(x):=1ni=1nd(x,Ci).

Since f is continuous on a compact set, it attains a minimum δ. The key observation is that, since every x is contained in some Ai, the extreme value theorem shows δ>0. Now we can verify that this δ is the desired Lebesgue's number. If Y is a subset of X of diameter less than δ, choose x0 as any point in Y, then by definition of diameter, YBδ(x0), where Bδ(x0) denotes the ball of radius δ centered at x0. Since f(x0)δ there must exist at least one i such that d(x0,Ci)δ. But this means that Bδ(x0)Ai and so, in particular, YAi.

Proof by Contradiction

Suppose for contradiction that X is sequentially compact, {UααJ} is an open cover of X, and the Lebesgue number δ does not exist. That is: for all δ>0, there exists AX with diam(A)<δ such that there does not exist βJ with AUβ.

This enables us to perform the following construction:

δ1=1,A1Xwherediam(A1)<δ1and¬β(A1Uβ)
δ2=12,A2Xwherediam(A2)<δ2and¬β(A2Uβ)
δk=1k,AkXwherediam(Ak)<δkand¬β(AkUβ)


Note that An for all n+, since An⊄Uβ. It is therefore possible by the axiom of choice to construct a sequence (xn) in which xiAi for each i. Since X is sequentially compact, there exists a subsequence {xnk} (with k>0) that converges to x0.

Because {Uα} is an open cover, there exists some α0J such that x0Uα0. As Uα0 is open, there exists r>0 with Bd(x0,r)Uα0. Now we invoke the convergence of the subsequence {xnk}: there exists L+ such that Lk implies xnkBr/2(x0).

Furthermore, there exists M>0 such that δM=1M<r2. Hence for all z>0, we have Mz implies diam(AM)<r2.

Finally, define q>0 such that nqM and qL. For all xAnq, notice that:

  • d(xnq,x)diam(Anq)<r2, because nqM.
  • d(xnq,x0)<r2, because qL entails xnqBr/2(x0).

Hence d(x0,x)<r by the triangle inequality, which implies that AnqUα0. This yields the desired contradiction.

References

Template:Metric spaces Template:Topology-stub