Gerbe

From testwiki
Revision as of 09:04, 11 November 2024 by imported>Citation bot (Altered title. Add: volume, series. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Sheaf theory | #UCB_Category 46/57)
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Other uses

In mathematics, a gerbe (Template:IPAc-en; Template:IPA) is a construct in homological algebra and topology. Gerbes were introduced by Jean Giraud Template:Harv following ideas of Alexandre Grothendieck as a tool for non-commutative cohomology in degree 2. They can be seen as an analogue of fibre bundles where the fibre is the classifying stack of a group. Gerbes provide a convenient, if highly abstract, language for dealing with many types of deformation questions especially in modern algebraic geometry. In addition, special cases of gerbes have been used more recently in differential topology and differential geometry to give alternative descriptions to certain cohomology classes and additional structures attached to them.

"Gerbe" is a French (and archaic English) word that literally means wheat sheaf.

Definitions

Gerbes on a topological space

A gerbe on a topological space S[1]Template:Rp is a stack ๐’ณ of groupoids over S that is locally non-empty (each point pS has an open neighbourhood Up over which the section category ๐’ณ(Up) of the gerbe is not empty) and transitive (for any two objects a and b of ๐’ณ(U) for any open set U, there is an open covering ๐’ฐ={Ui}iI of U such that the restrictions of a and b to each Ui are connected by at least one morphism).

A canonical example is the gerbe BH of principal bundles with a fixed structure group H: the section category over an open set U is the category of principal H-bundles on U with isomorphism as morphisms (thus the category is a groupoid). As principal bundles glue together (satisfy the descent condition), these groupoids form a stack. The trivial bundle X×HX shows that the local non-emptiness condition is satisfied, and finally as principal bundles are locally trivial, they become isomorphic when restricted to sufficiently small open sets; thus the transitivity condition is satisfied as well.

Gerbes on a site

The most general definition of gerbes are defined over a site. Given a site ๐’ž a ๐’ž-gerbe G[2][3]Template:Rp is a category fibered in groupoids G๐’ž such that

  1. There exists a refinement[4] ๐’ž of ๐’ž such that for every object SOb(๐’ž) the associated fibered category GS is non-empty
  2. For every SOb(๐’ž) any two objects in the fibered category GS are locally isomorphic

Note that for a site ๐’ž with a final object e, a category fibered in groupoids G๐’ž is a ๐’ž-gerbe admits a local section, meaning satisfies the first axiom, if Ob(Ge).

Motivation for gerbes on a site

One of the main motivations for considering gerbes on a site is to consider the following naive question: if the Cech cohomology group H1(๐’ฐ,G) for a suitable covering ๐’ฐ={Ui}iI of a space X gives the isomorphism classes of principal G-bundles over X, what does the iterated cohomology functor H1(,H1(,G)) represent? Meaning, we are gluing together the groups H1(Ui,G) via some one cocycle. Gerbes are a technical response for this question: they give geometric representations of elements in the higher cohomology group H2(๐’ฐ,G). It is expected this intuition should hold for higher gerbes.

Cohomological classification

One of the main theorems concerning gerbes is their cohomological classification whenever they have automorphism groups given by a fixed sheaf of abelian groups

L_

,[5][2] called a band. For a gerbe

๐’ณ

on a site

๐’ž

, an object

UOb(๐’ž)

, and an object

xOb(๐’ณ(U))

, the automorphism group of a gerbe is defined as the automorphism group

L=Aut_๐’ณ(U)(x)

. Notice this is well defined whenever the automorphism group is always the same. Given a covering

๐’ฐ={UiX}iI

, there is an associated class

c(L_)H3(X,L_)

representing the isomorphism class of the gerbe

๐’ณ

banded by

L

. For example, in topology, many examples of gerbes can be constructed by considering gerbes banded by the group

U(1)

. As the classifying space

B(U(1))=K(โ„ค,2)

is the second Eilenbergโ€“Maclane space for the integers, a bundle gerbe banded by

U(1)

on a topological space

X

is constructed from a homotopy class of maps in

[X,B2(U(1))]=[X,K(โ„ค,3)]

,

which is exactly the third singular homology group

H3(X,โ„ค)

. It has been found[6] that all gerbes representing torsion cohomology classes in

H3(X,โ„ค)

are represented by a bundle of finite dimensional algebras

End(V)

for a fixed complex vector space

V

. In addition, the non-torsion classes are represented as infinite-dimensional principal bundles

PU(โ„‹)

of the projective group of unitary operators on a fixed infinite dimensional separable Hilbert space

โ„‹

. Note this is well defined because all separable Hilbert spaces are isomorphic to the space of square-summable sequences

2

. The homotopy-theoretic interpretation of gerbes comes from looking at the homotopy fiber square

๐’ณ*Sโ†’fB2U(1)

analogous to how a line bundle comes from the homotopy fiber square

L*Sโ†’fBU(1)

where

BU(1)K(โ„ค,2)

, giving

H2(S,โ„ค)

as the group of isomorphism classes of line bundles on

S

.

Examples

C*-algebras

There are natural examples of Gerbes that arise from studying the algebra of compactly supported complex valued functions on a paracompact space

X

[7]pg 3. Given a cover

๐’ฐ={Ui}

of

X

there is the Cech groupoid defined as

๐’ข={i,jUijUi}

with source and target maps given by the inclusions

s:UijUjt:UijUi

and the space of composable arrows is just

i,j,kUijk

Then a degree 2 cohomology class

σH2(X;U(1))

is just a map

σ:UijkU(1)

We can then form a non-commutative C*-algebra

Cc(๐’ข(σ))

, which is associated to the set of compact supported complex valued functions of the space

๐’ข1=i,jUij

It has a non-commutative product given by

a*b(x,i,k):=ja(x,i,j)b(x,j,k)σ(x,i,j,k)

where the cohomology class

σ

twists the multiplication of the standard

C*

-algebra product.

Algebraic geometry

Let M be a variety over an algebraically closed field k, G an algebraic group, for example ๐”พm. Recall that a G-torsor over M is an algebraic space P with an action of G and a map π:PM, such that locally on M (in รฉtale topology or fppf topology) π is a direct product π|U:G×UU. A G-gerbe over M may be defined in a similar way. It is an Artin stack โ„ณ with a map π:โ„ณM, such that locally on M (in รฉtale or fppf topology) π is a direct product π|U:BG×UU.[8] Here BG denotes the classifying stack of G, i.e. a quotient [*/G] of a point by a trivial G-action. There is no need to impose the compatibility with the group structure in that case since it is covered by the definition of a stack. The underlying topological spaces of โ„ณ and M are the same, but in โ„ณ each point is equipped with a stabilizer group isomorphic to G.

From two-term complexes of coherent sheaves

Every two-term complex of coherent sheaves

โ„ฐ=[โ„ฐ1โ†’dโ„ฐ0]

on a scheme

XSch

has a canonical sheaf of groupoids associated to it, where on an open subset

UX

there is a two-term complex of

X(U)

-modules

โ„ฐ1(U)โ†’dโ„ฐ0(U)

giving a groupoid. It has objects given by elements

xโ„ฐ0(U)

and a morphism

xx

is given by an element

yโ„ฐ1(U)

such that

dy+x=x

In order for this stack to be a gerbe, the cohomology sheaf

โ„‹0(โ„ฐ)

must always have a section. This hypothesis implies the category constructed above always has objects. Note this can be applied to the situation of comodules over Hopf-algebroids to construct algebraic models of gerbes over affine or projective stacks (projectivity if a graded Hopf-algebroid is used). In addition, two-term spectra from the stabilization of the derived category of comodules of Hopf-algebroids

(A,Γ)

with

Γ

flat over

A

give additional models of gerbes that are non-strict.

Moduli stack of stable bundles on a curve

Consider a smooth projective curve C over k of genus g>1. Let โ„ณr,ds be the moduli stack of stable vector bundles on C of rank r and degree d. It has a coarse moduli space Mr,ds, which is a quasiprojective variety. These two moduli problems parametrize the same objects, but the stacky version remembers automorphisms of vector bundles. For any stable vector bundle E the automorphism group Aut(E) consists only of scalar multiplications, so each point in a moduli stack has a stabilizer isomorphic to ๐”พm. It turns out that the map โ„ณr,dsMr,ds is indeed a ๐”พm-gerbe in the sense above.[9] It is a trivial gerbe if and only if r and d are coprime.

Root stacks

Another class of gerbes can be found using the construction of root stacks. Informally, the

r

-th root stack of a line bundle

LS

over a scheme is a space representing the

r

-th root of

L

and is denoted

L/Sr.

[10]pg 52

The

r

-th root stack of

L

has the property

rL/SrL

as gerbes. It is constructed as the stack

L/Sr:(Sch/S)opGrpd

sending an

S

-scheme

TS

to the category whose objects are line bundles of the form

{(MT,αM):αM:Mrโ†’L×ST}

and morphisms are commutative diagrams compatible with the isomorphisms

αM

. This gerbe is banded by the algebraic group of roots of unity

μr

, where on a cover

TS

it acts on a point

(MT,αM)

by cyclically permuting the factors of

M

in

Mr

. Geometrically, these stacks are formed as the fiber product of stacks

X×B๐”พmB๐”พmB๐”พmXB๐”พm

where the vertical map of

B๐”พmB๐”พm

comes from the Kummer sequence

1โ†’μrโ†’๐”พmโ†’()r๐”พmโ†’1

This is because

B๐”พm

is the moduli space of line bundles, so the line bundle

LS

corresponds to an object of the category

B๐”พm(S)

(considered as a point of the moduli space).

Root stacks with sections

There is another related construction of root stacks with sections. Given the data above, let

s:SL

be a section. Then the

r

-th root stack of the pair

(LS,s)

is defined as the lax 2-functor[10][11]

(L,s)/Sr:(Sch/S)opGrpd

sending an

S

-scheme

TS

to the category whose objects are line bundles of the form

{(MT,αM,t):αM:Mrโ†’L×STtΓ(T,M)αM(tr)=s}

and morphisms are given similarly. These stacks can be constructed very explicitly, and are well understood for affine schemes. In fact, these form the affine models for root stacks with sections.[11]Template:Rp Locally, we may assume

S=Spec(A)

and the line bundle

L

is trivial, hence any section

s

is equivalent to taking an element

sA

. Then, the stack is given by the stack quotient

(L,s)/Sr=[Spec(B)/μr]

[11]Template:Rp

with

B=A[x]xrs

If

s=0

then this gives an infinitesimal extension of

[Spec(A)/μr]

.

Examples throughout algebraic geometry

These and more general kinds of gerbes arise in several contexts as both geometric spaces and as formal bookkeeping tools:

Differential geometry

History

Template:More citations needed section

Gerbes first appeared in the context of algebraic geometry. They were subsequently developed in a more traditional geometric framework by Brylinski Template:Harv. One can think of gerbes as being a natural step in a hierarchy of mathematical objects providing geometric realizations of integral cohomology classes.

A more specialised notion of gerbe was introduced by Murray and called bundle gerbes. Essentially they are a smooth version of abelian gerbes belonging more to the hierarchy starting with principal bundles than sheaves. Bundle gerbes have been used in gauge theory and also string theory. Current work by others is developing a theory of non-abelian bundle gerbes.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Introductory articles

Gerbes in topology

Twisted K-theory

Applications in string theory