Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 September 8
From testwiki
Revision as of 02:33, 15 September 2016 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving September 8)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Template:Error:not substituted
{| width = "100%"
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < September 7 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Aug | September | Oct >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Contents
September 8
Model theory
Let's say we are given two first-order formulas - each of which has two free variables. Let's assume that it follows from Peano system that for every there exists satisfying both: - and .
Is it provable (maybe by Compactness theorem? ) that Peano system has a model in which, for every there exists satisfying both: - and for every finite ?
HOTmag (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Either I'm misunderstanding what you're asking, or it's trivial. Your premise is that PA proves ? In any nonstandard model, fix nonstandard. Then for every there is a with , by assumption. This is as desired.--2406:E006:384B:1:8C1E:B081:1ABF:3C81 (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks to your important comment, I've just changed slightly my original post. Please have a look at the current version of my question. HOTmag (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- I think this still isn't what you mean to ask. Let be a tautology, and let be . Then it's certainly true that for every pair there is a -- namely, . But there is no that works for every finite .--2406:E006:384B:1:8C1E:B081:1ABF:3C81 (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks to your important comment, I've just changed slightly my original post. Please have a look at the current version of my question. HOTmag (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2016 (UTC)