Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2009 November 20
Template:Error:not substituted
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < November 19 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Oct | November | Dec >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
November 20
Counting system
Template:Resolved StuRat (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
What's the name of the common counting system where you draw 1-4 lines and then put a slash through the four lines when you get to 5 ? It looks something like this:
||||/ |||| ||| || | |||/ |||| ||| || | ||/|=5 ||||=4 |||=3 ||=2 |=1 |/|| |||| ||| || | /||| |||| ||| || | /|||| |||| ||| || |
StuRat (talk) 10:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Also five-barred gate, rather more specific than tally.→86.148.187.62 (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Investigation of an integral
I'm working my way through some assorted questions, and stumbled across the following:
I'm afraid I can't really get anywhere with it, and when I finally succombed to Mathematica it told me it didn't converge between 0 and 3. Any suggestions for what I should try? --80.229.152.246 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Without knowing what level you're at, I can't guess what investigations you're supposed to carry out, but the value of the integral is fairly obviously +∞. Algebraist 22:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I got that much, but didn't really get anything else apart from that. Also, how would you go about setting out a proof of that fact? As for my current level, just before undergraduate. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would prove it by noting that the function is clearly measurable, that the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem implies that the integral you want is the limit of , and that the Fundamental theorem of calculus allows you to calculate those integrals and see that the limit is indeed plus infinity. That's not what I'd've written before I was an undergrad, though. Algebraist 23:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for that. While I agree that it's not exactly what a pre-undergrad would write, I'll still look into it. It's sure to be interesting, regardless. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I would prove it by noting that the function is clearly measurable, that the Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem implies that the integral you want is the limit of , and that the Fundamental theorem of calculus allows you to calculate those integrals and see that the limit is indeed plus infinity. That's not what I'd've written before I was an undergrad, though. Algebraist 23:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I got that much, but didn't really get anything else apart from that. Also, how would you go about setting out a proof of that fact? As for my current level, just before undergraduate. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Since as a pre-undergrad. you are likely to be more familiar with Riemann integral, rather than Lebesgue integral, here is a proof you can follow based on those ideas:
- Show that for any , (Hint: the integrand is positive)
- Observe that, .
Now by choosing h small enough, you can make the lower bound for the integral as large as you want. Hence the original integral evaluates to +∞. QED. Abecedare (talk)
- Also, if you can do simple linear changes of variable, you may observe that
- that also makes it clear that the integral diverges.--pma (talk) 05:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help. --80.229.152.246 (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)