Remez inequality

From testwiki
Revision as of 19:12, 23 October 2024 by 2a02:a473:d58:1:cc32:4322:9ecb:f71a (talk) (Be clear: do not write "R.i." for Remez inequality.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, the Remez inequality, discovered by the Soviet mathematician Evgeny Yakovlevich Remez Template:Harv, gives a bound on the sup norms of certain polynomials, the bound being attained by the Chebyshev polynomials.

The inequality

Let σ be an arbitrary fixed positive number. Define the class of polynomials πn(σ) to be those polynomials p of degree n for which

|p(x)|1

on some set of measure ≥ 2 contained in the closed interval [−1, 1+σ]. Then the Remez inequality states that

suppπn(σ)p=Tn

where Tn(x) is the Chebyshev polynomial of degree n, and the supremum norm is taken over the interval [−1, 1+σ].

Observe that Tn is increasing on [1,+], hence

Tn=Tn(1+σ).

The R.i., combined with an estimate on Chebyshev polynomials, implies the following corollary: If J ⊂ R is a finite interval, and E ⊂ J is an arbitrary measurable set, then Template:NumBlk for any polynomial p of degree n.

Extensions: Nazarov–Turán lemma

Inequalities similar to (Template:EquationNote) have been proved for different classes of functions, and are known as Remez-type inequalities. One important example is Nazarov's inequality for exponential sums Template:Harv:

Nazarov's inequality. Let
p(x)=k=1nakeλkx
be an exponential sum (with arbitrary λk ∈C), and let J ⊂ R be a finite interval, E ⊂ J—an arbitrary measurable set. Then
maxxJ|p(x)|emaxk|λk|mesJ(CmesJmesE)n1supxE|p(x)|,
where C > 0 is a numerical constant.

In the special case when λk are pure imaginary and integer, and the subset E is itself an interval, the inequality was proved by Pál Turán and is known as Turán's lemma.

This inequality also extends to Lp(𝕋), 0p2 in the following way

pLp(𝕋)eA(n1)mes(𝕋E)pLp(E)

for some A > 0 independent of p, E, and n. When

mesE<1lognn

a similar inequality holds for p > 2. For p = ∞ there is an extension to multidimensional polynomials.

Proof: Applying Nazarov's lemma to E=Eλ={x:|p(x)|λ}, λ>0 leads to

maxxJ|p(x)|emaxk|λk|mesJ(CmesJmesEλ)n1supxEλ|p(x)|emaxk|λk|mesJ(CmesJmesEλ)n1λ

thus

mesEλCmesJ(λemaxk|λk|mesJmaxxJ|p(x)|)1n1

Now fix a set E and choose λ such that mesEλ12mesE, that is

λ=(mesE2CmesJ)n1emaxk|λk|mesJmaxxJ|p(x)|

Note that this implies:

  1. mesEEλ12mesE.
  2. xEEλ:|p(x)|>λ.

Now

xE|p(x)|pdxxEEλ|p(x)|pdxλp12mesE=12mesE(mesE2CmesJ)p(n1)epmaxk|λk|mesJmaxxJ|p(x)|p12mesEmesJ(mesE2CmesJ)p(n1)epmaxk|λk|mesJxJ|p(x)|pdx,

which completes the proof.

Pólya inequality

One of the corollaries of the Remez inequality is the Pólya inequality, which was proved by George Pólya Template:Harv, and states that the Lebesgue measure of a sub-level set of a polynomial p of degree n is bounded in terms of the leading coefficient LC(p) as follows:

mes{x:|P(x)|a}4(a2LC(p))1/n,a>0.

References