Quantum instrument: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>TheReelEvee
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:49, 5 February 2025

Template:Use American EnglishTemplate:Short description In quantum physics, a quantum instrument is a mathematical description of a quantum measurement, capturing both the classical and quantum outputs.[1] It can be equivalently understood as a quantum channel that takes as input a quantum system and has as its output two systems: a classical system containing the outcome of the measurement and a quantum system containing the post-measurement state.[2]

Definition

Let X be a countable set describing the outcomes of a quantum measurement, and let {x}xX denote a collection of trace-non-increasing completely positive maps, such that the sum of all x is trace-preserving, i.e. tr(xx(ρ))=tr(ρ) for all positive operators ρ.

Now for describing a measurement by an instrument , the maps x are used to model the mapping from an input state ρ to the output state of a measurement conditioned on a classical measurement outcome x. Therefore, the probability that a specific measurement outcome x occurs on a state ρ is given by[3][4] p(x|ρ)=tr(x(ρ)).

The state after a measurement with the specific outcome x is given by[3][4]

ρx=x(ρ)tr(x(ρ)).

If the measurement outcomes are recorded in a classical register, whose states are modeled by a set of orthonormal projections |xx|(|X|) , then the action of an instrument is given by a quantum channel :(1)(2)(|X|) with[2]

(ρ):=xx(ρ)|xx|.

Here 1 and 2|X| are the Hilbert spaces corresponding to the input and the output systems of the instrument.

Reductions and inductions

Just as a completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) map can always be considered as the reduction of unitary evolution on a system with an initially unentangled auxiliary, quantum instruments are the reductions of projective measurement with a conditional unitary, and also reduce to CPTP maps and POVMs when ignore measurement outcomes and state evolution, respectively.[4] In John Smolin's terminology, this is an example of "going to the Church of the Larger Hilbert space".

As a reduction of projective measurement and conditional unitary

Any quantum instrument on a system 𝒮 can be modeled as a projective measurement on 𝒮 and (jointly) an uncorrelated auxiliary 𝒜 followed by a unitary conditional on the measurement outcome.[3][4] Let η (with η>0 and Trη=1) be the normalized initial state of 𝒜, let {Πi} (with Πi=Πi=Πi2 and ΠiΠj=δijΠi) be a projective measurement on 𝒮𝒜, and let {Ui} (with Ui=Ui1) be unitaries on 𝒮𝒜. Then one can check that

i(ρ):=Tr𝒜(UiΠi(ρη)ΠiUi)

defines a quantum instrument.[4] Furthermore, one can also check that any choice of quantum instrument {i} can be obtained with this construction for some choice of η and {Ui}.[4]

In this sense, a quantum instrument can be thought of as the reduction of a projective measurement combined with a conditional unitary.

Reduction to CPTP map

Any quantum instrument {i} immediately induces a CPTP map, i.e., a quantum channel:[4]

(ρ):=ii(ρ).

This can be thought of as the overall effect of the measurement on the quantum system if the measurement outcome is thrown away.

Reduction to POVM

Any quantum instrument {i} immediately induces a positive operator-valued measurement (POVM):

Mi:=aKa(i)Ka(i)

where Ka(i) are any choice of Kraus operators for i,[4]

i(ρ)=aKa(i)ρKa(i).

The Kraus operators Ka(i) are not uniquely determined by the CP maps i, but the above definition of the POVM elements Mi is the same for any choice.[4] The POVM can be thought of as the measurement of the quantum system if the information about how the system is affected by the measurement is thrown away.

References

Template:Reflist