Malliavin calculus

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In probability theory and related fields, Malliavin calculus is a set of mathematical techniques and ideas that extend the mathematical field of calculus of variations from deterministic functions to stochastic processes. In particular, it allows the computation of derivatives of random variables. Malliavin calculus is also called the stochastic calculus of variations. P. Malliavin first initiated the calculus on infinite dimensional space. Then, the significant contributors such as S. Kusuoka, D. Stroock, J-M. Bismut, Shinzo Watanabe, I. Shigekawa, and so on finally completed the foundations.

Malliavin calculus is named after Paul Malliavin whose ideas led to a proof that Hörmander's condition implies the existence and smoothness of a density for the solution of a stochastic differential equation; Hörmander's original proof was based on the theory of partial differential equations. The calculus has been applied to stochastic partial differential equations as well.

The calculus allows integration by parts with random variables; this operation is used in mathematical finance to compute the sensitivities of financial derivatives. The calculus has applications in, for example, stochastic filtering.

Overview and history

Malliavin introduced Malliavin calculus to provide a stochastic proof that Hörmander's condition implies the existence of a density for the solution of a stochastic differential equation; Hörmander's original proof was based on the theory of partial differential equations. His calculus enabled Malliavin to prove regularity bounds for the solution's density. The calculus has been applied to stochastic partial differential equations.

Gaussian probability space

Template:Main Consider a Wiener functional F (a functional from the classical Wiener space) and consider the task of finding a derivative for it. The natural idea would be to use the Gateaux derivative

DgF:=ddτF[f+τg]|τ=0,

however this does not always exist. Therefore it does make sense to find a new differential calculus for such spaces by limiting the directions.

The toy model of Malliavin calculus is an irreducible Gaussian probability space X=(Ω,,P,). This is a (complete) probability space (Ω,,P) together with a closed subspace L2(Ω,,P) such that all H are mean zero Gaussian variables and =σ(H:H). If one chooses a basis for then one calls X a numerical model. On the other hand, for any separable Hilbert space 𝒢 exists a canonical irreducible Gaussian probability space Seg(𝒢) named the Segal model (named after Irving Segal) having 𝒢 as its Gaussian subspace. In this case for a g𝒢 one notates the associated random variable in Seg(𝒢) as W(g).

Properties of a Gaussian probability space that do not depend on the particular choice of basis are called intrinsic and such that do depend on the choice extrensic.[1] We denote the countably infinite product of real spaces as =i=1.

Recall the modern version of the Cameron-Martin theorem

Consider a locally convex vector space E with a cylindrical Gaussian measure γ on it. For an element in the topological dual fE define the distance to the mean
tγ(f):=fEf(x)γ(dx),
which is a map tγ:EL2(E,γ), and denote the closure in L2(E,γ) as
Eγ:=clos{tγ(f): fE}
Let γm:=γ(m) denote the translation by mE. Then Eγ respectively the covariance operator Rγ:Eγ(Eγ)* on it induces a reproducing kernel Hilbert space R called the Cameron-Martin space such that for any mR there is equivalence γmγ.[2]

In fact one can use here the Feldman–Hájek theorem to find that for any other h∉R such measure would be singular.

Let γ be the canonical Gaussian measure, by transferring the Cameron-Martin theorem from (,(),γ=nγ) into a numerical model X, the additive group of will define a quasi-automorphism group on Ω. A construction can be done as follows: choose an orthonormal basis in , let τα(x)=x+α denote the translation on by α, denote the map into the Cameron-Martin space by j:2, denote

L0(Ω,,P)=p<Lp(Ω,,P) and q:L0(,(),γ)L0(Ω,,P),

we get a canonical representation of the additive group ρ:End(L0(Ω,,P)) acting on the endomorphisms by defining

ρ(h)=qτj(h)q1.

One can show that the action of ρ is extrinsic meaning it does not depend on the choice of basis for , further ρ(h+h)=ρ(h)ρ(h) for h,h and for the infinitesimal generator of (ρ(h))h that

lim\limits ε0ρ(εh)Iε=Mh

where I is the identity operator and Mh denotes the multiplication operator by the random variable h (acting on the endomorphisms). In the case of an arbitrary Hilbert space 𝒢 and the Segal model Seg(𝒢) one has j:𝒢2 (and thus ρ:𝒢End(L0(Ω,,P)). Then the limit above becomes the multiplication operator by the random variable W(g) associated to g𝒢.[3]

For FL0(Ω,,P) and h one now defines the directional derivative

DF,h=DhF=lim\limits ε0(ρ(εh)I)Fε.

Given a Hilbert space H and a Segal model Seg(H) with its Gaussian space ={W(h):hH}. One can now deduce for FL0(Ω,,P) the integration by parts formula

𝔼[DhF]=𝔼[MW(h)F]=𝔼[W(h)F].[4]

Invariance principle

The usual invariance principle for Lebesgue integration over the whole real line is that, for any real number ε and integrable function f, the following holds

f(x)dλ(x)=f(x+ε)dλ(x) and hence f(x)dλ(x)=0.

This can be used to derive the integration by parts formula since, setting f = gh, it implies

0=fdλ=(gh)dλ=ghdλ+ghdλ.

A similar idea can be applied in stochastic analysis for the differentiation along a Cameron-Martin-Girsanov direction. Indeed, let hs be a square-integrable predictable process and set

φ(t)=0thsds.

If X is a Wiener process, the Girsanov theorem then yields the following analogue of the invariance principle:

E(F(X+εφ))=E[F(X)exp(ε01hsdXs12ε201hs2ds)].

Differentiating with respect to ε on both sides and evaluating at ε=0, one obtains the following integration by parts formula:

E(DF(X),φ)=E[F(X)01hsdXs].

Here, the left-hand side is the Malliavin derivative of the random variable F in the direction φ and the integral appearing on the right hand side should be interpreted as an Itô integral.

Clark–Ocone formula

Template:Main

One of the most useful results from Malliavin calculus is the Clark–Ocone theorem, which allows the process in the martingale representation theorem to be identified explicitly. A simplified version of this theorem is as follows:

Consider the standard Wiener measure on the canonical space C[0,1], equipped with its canonical filtration. For F:C[0,1] satisfying E(F(X)2)< which is Lipschitz and such that F has a strong derivative kernel, in the sense that for φ in C[0,1]

limε01ε(F(X+εφ)F(X))=01F(X,dt)φ(t) a.e. X

then

F(X)=E(F(X))+01HtdXt,

where H is the previsible projection of F'(x, (t,1]) which may be viewed as the derivative of the function F with respect to a suitable parallel shift of the process X over the portion (t,1] of its domain.

This may be more concisely expressed by

F(X)=E(F(X))+01E(DtFt)dXt.

Much of the work in the formal development of the Malliavin calculus involves extending this result to the largest possible class of functionals F by replacing the derivative kernel used above by the "Malliavin derivative" denoted Dt in the above statement of the result. Template:Citation needed

Skorokhod integral

Template:Main The Skorokhod integral operator which is conventionally denoted δ is defined as the adjoint of the Malliavin derivative in the white noise case when the Hilbert space is an L2 space, thus for u in the domain of the operator which is a subset of L2([0,)×Ω), for F in the domain of the Malliavin derivative, we require

E(DF,u)=E(Fδ(u)),

where the inner product is that on L2[0,) viz

f,g=0f(s)g(s)ds.

The existence of this adjoint follows from the Riesz representation theorem for linear operators on Hilbert spaces.

It can be shown that if u is adapted then

δ(u)=0utdWt,

where the integral is to be understood in the Itô sense. Thus this provides a method of extending the Itô integral to non adapted integrands.

Applications

The calculus allows integration by parts with random variables; this operation is used in mathematical finance to compute the sensitivities of financial derivatives. The calculus has applications for example in stochastic filtering.

Template:No footnotes

References

Template:Reflist

  • Kusuoka, S. and Stroock, D. (1981) "Applications of Malliavin Calculus I", Stochastic Analysis, Proceedings Taniguchi International Symposium Katata and Kyoto 1982, pp 271–306
  • Kusuoka, S. and Stroock, D. (1985) "Applications of Malliavin Calculus II", J. Faculty Sci. Uni. Tokyo Sect. 1A Math., 32 pp 1–76
  • Kusuoka, S. and Stroock, D. (1987) "Applications of Malliavin Calculus III", J. Faculty Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 1A Math., 34 pp 391–442
  • Malliavin, Paul and Thalmaier, Anton. Stochastic Calculus of Variations in Mathematical Finance, Springer 2005, Template:Isbn
  • Template:Cite book
  • Bell, Denis. (2007) The Malliavin Calculus, Dover. Template:Isbn; ebook
  • Sanz-Solé, Marta (2005) Malliavin Calculus, with applications to stochastic partial differential equations. EPFL Press, distributed by CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Schiller, Alex (2009) Malliavin Calculus for Monte Carlo Simulation with Financial Applications. Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Princeton University
  • Øksendal, Bernt K.(1997) An Introduction To Malliavin Calculus With Applications To Economics. Lecture Notes, Dept. of Mathematics, University of Oslo (Zip file containing Thesis and addendum)
  • Di Nunno, Giulia, Øksendal, Bernt, Proske, Frank (2009) "Malliavin Calculus for Lévy Processes with Applications to Finance", Universitext, Springer. Template:Isbn