Engel's theorem

From testwiki
Revision as of 06:49, 4 February 2025 by imported>Jayman02 (β†’growthexperiments-addlink-summary-summary:3|0|0)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In representation theory, a branch of mathematics, Engel's theorem states that a finite-dimensional Lie algebra 𝔀 is a nilpotent Lie algebra if and only if for each X𝔀, the adjoint map

ad(X):𝔀𝔀,

given by ad(X)(Y)=[X,Y], is a nilpotent endomorphism on 𝔀; i.e., ad(X)k=0 for some k.Template:Sfn It is a consequence of the theorem, also called Engel's theorem, which says that if a Lie algebra of matrices consists of nilpotent matrices, then the matrices can all be simultaneously brought to a strictly upper triangular form. Note that if we merely have a Lie algebra of matrices which is nilpotent as a Lie algebra, then this conclusion does not follow (i.e. the naΓ―ve replacement in Lie's theorem of "solvable" with "nilpotent", and "upper triangular" with "strictly upper triangular", is false; this already fails for the one-dimensional Lie subalgebra of scalar matrices).

The theorem is named after the mathematician Friedrich Engel, who sketched a proof of it in a letter to Wilhelm Killing dated 20 July 1890 Template:Harv. Engel's student K.A. Umlauf gave a complete proof in his 1891 dissertation, reprinted as Template:Harv.

Statements

Let 𝔀𝔩(V) be the Lie algebra of the endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional vector space V and 𝔀𝔀𝔩(V) a subalgebra. Then Engel's theorem states the following are equivalent:

  1. Each X𝔀 is a nilpotent endomorphism on V.
  2. There exists a flag V=V0V1Vn=0,codimVi=i such that 𝔀ViVi+1; i.e., the elements of 𝔀 are simultaneously strictly upper-triangulizable.

Note that no assumption on the underlying base field is required.

We note that Statement 2. for various 𝔀 and V is equivalent to the statement

  • For each nonzero finite-dimensional vector space V and a subalgebra 𝔀𝔀𝔩(V), there exists a nonzero vector v in V such that X(v)=0 for every X𝔀.

This is the form of the theorem proven in #Proof. (This statement is trivially equivalent to Statement 2 since it allows one to inductively construct a flag with the required property.)

In general, a Lie algebra 𝔀 is said to be nilpotent if the lower central series of it vanishes in a finite step; i.e., for C0𝔀=𝔀,Ci𝔀=[𝔀,Ci1𝔀] = (i+1)-th power of 𝔀, there is some k such that Ck𝔀=0. Then Engel's theorem implies the following theorem (also called Engel's theorem): when 𝔀 has finite dimension,

  • 𝔀 is nilpotent if and only if ad(X) is nilpotent for each X𝔀.

Indeed, if ad(𝔀) consists of nilpotent operators, then by 1. 2. applied to the algebra ad(𝔀)𝔀𝔩(𝔀), there exists a flag 𝔀=𝔀0𝔀1𝔀n=0 such that [𝔀,𝔀i]𝔀i+1. Since Ci𝔀𝔀i, this implies 𝔀 is nilpotent. (The converse follows straightforwardly from the definition.)

Proof

We prove the following form of the theorem:Template:Sfn if 𝔀𝔀𝔩(V) is a Lie subalgebra such that every X𝔀 is a nilpotent endomorphism and if V has positive dimension, then there exists a nonzero vector v in V such that X(v)=0 for each X in 𝔀.

The proof is by induction on the dimension of 𝔀 and consists of a few steps. (Note the structure of the proof is very similar to that for Lie's theorem, which concerns a solvable algebra.) The basic case is trivial and we assume the dimension of 𝔀 is positive.

Step 1: Find an ideal π”₯ of codimension one in 𝔀.

This is the most difficult step. Let π”₯ be a maximal (proper) subalgebra of 𝔀, which exists by finite-dimensionality. We claim it is an ideal of codimension one. For each Xπ”₯, it is easy to check that (1) ad(X) induces a linear endomorphism 𝔀/π”₯𝔀/π”₯ and (2) this induced map is nilpotent (in fact, ad(X) is nilpotent as X is nilpotent; see Jordan decomposition in Lie algebras). Thus, by inductive hypothesis applied to the Lie subalgebra of 𝔀𝔩(𝔀/π”₯) generated by ad(π”₯), there exists a nonzero vector v in 𝔀/π”₯ such that ad(X)(v)=0 for each Xπ”₯. That is to say, if v=[Y] for some Y in 𝔀 but not in π”₯, then [X,Y]=ad(X)(Y)π”₯ for every Xπ”₯. But then the subspace π”₯𝔀 spanned by π”₯ and Y is a Lie subalgebra in which π”₯ is an ideal of codimension one. Hence, by maximality, π”₯=𝔀. This proves the claim.

Step 2: Let W={vV|X(v)=0,Xπ”₯}. Then 𝔀 stabilizes W; i.e., X(v)W for each X𝔀,vW.

Indeed, for Y in 𝔀 and X in π”₯, we have: X(Y(v))=Y(X(v))+[X,Y](v)=0 since π”₯ is an ideal and so [X,Y]π”₯. Thus, Y(v) is in W.

Step 3: Finish up the proof by finding a nonzero vector that gets killed by 𝔀.

Write 𝔀=π”₯+L where L is a one-dimensional vector subspace. Let Y be a nonzero vector in L and v a nonzero vector in W. Now, Y is a nilpotent endomorphism (by hypothesis) and so Yk(v)0,Yk+1(v)=0 for some k. Then Yk(v) is a required vector as the vector lies in W by Step 2.

See also

Notes

Template:Notelist

Citations

Template:Reflist

Works cited

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend