Friedmann equations

The Friedmann equations, also known as the Friedmann–Lemaître (FL) equations, are a set of equations in physical cosmology that govern cosmic expansion in homogeneous and isotropic models of the universe within the context of general relativity. They were first derived by Alexander Friedmann in 1922 from Einstein's field equations of gravitation for the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric and a perfect fluid with a given mass density Template:Mvar and pressure Template:Mvar. The equations for negative spatial curvature were given by Friedmann in 1924. The physicals models built on the Friedmann equations are called FRW or FLRW models and from the Standard Model of modern cosmology, although such a description is also associated with the further developed Lambda-CDM model. The FLRW model was developed independently by the named authors in the 1920s and 1930s.

Assumptions

The Friedmann equations build on three assumptions:Template:Rp

1. the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric,
2. Einstein's equations for general relativity, and
3. a perfect fluid source.

The metric in turn starts with the simplifying assumption that the universe is spatially homogeneous and isotropic, that is, the cosmological principle; empirically, this is justified on scales larger than the order of 100 Mpc.

The metric can be written as:Template:Rp $$c^{2}d{\tau }^2=c^{2}d{t}^2-R^2(t)(d{r}^2+S_k^2(r)d{\psi }^2)$$ where $$S_{-1}(r)=\sinh (r),S_0=1,S_1=\sin (r).$$ These three possibilities correspond to parameter Template:Mvar of (0) flat space, (+1) a sphere of constant positive curvature or (-1) a hyperbolic space with constant negative curvature. Here the radial position has been decomposed into a time-dependent scale factor, $R(t)$, and a comoving coordinate, $r$. Inserting this metric into Einstein's field equations relate the evolution of this scale factor to the pressure and energy of the matter in the universe. With the stress–energy tensor for a perfect fluid, results in the equations are described below.Template:Rp

Dimensionless scale factor

A dimensionless scale factor can be defined: $$a(t)\equiv \frac{R(t)}{R_0}$$ using the present day value

$R_0=R(\text{now})$.

The Friedmann equations can be written in terms of this dimensionless scale factor: $$H^2(t)={\left(\frac{da/dt}{a}\right)}^2=\frac{8\pi G_N}{3}[\rho (t)+\frac{{\rho }_c-{\rho }_0}{a^2(t)}]$$ where ${\rho }_c=3H_0^2/8\pi G_n$ and ${\rho }_0=\rho (t=\text{now})$.Template:Rp

Equations

There are two independent Friedmann equations for modelling a homogeneous, isotropic universe The first is: $$H^2\equiv {\left(\frac{\dot{R}}{R}\right)}^2=\frac{8\pi G_N\rho }{3}-\frac{k}{R^2}+\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }}{3},$$ and second is: $$\frac{\ddot{R}}{R}=\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }}{3}-\frac{4\pi G_N}{3}(\rho +3p).$$ The term Friedmann equation sometimes is used only for the first equation. In these equations, Template:Mvar is the cosmological scale factor, $G_N$ is the Newtonian constant of gravitation, Template:Math is the cosmological constant with dimension length⁻², Template:Mvar is the energy density and Template:Mvar is the isotropic pressure. Template:Mvar is constant throughout a particular solution, but may vary from one solution to another. The units set the speed of light in vacuum to one.

In previous equations, Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar are functions of time. If the cosmological constant, Template:Math, is ignored, the term $-k/R^2$ in the first Friedmann equation can be interpreted as a Newtonian total energy, so the evolution of the universe pits gravitational potential energy, $8\pi G_N\rho /3$ against kinetic energy, $\dot{R}/R$. The winner depends upon the Template:Mvar value in the total energy: if k is +1, gravity eventually causes the universe to contract. These conclusions will be altered if the Template:Math is not zero.

Using the first equation, the second equation can be re-expressed as: $$\dot{\rho }=-3H(\rho +\frac{p}{c^2}),$$ which eliminates Template:Math. Alternatively the conservation of mass–energy: $$T^{\alpha \beta }{}_{;\beta }=0$$ leads to the same result.

Critical density

That value of the mass-energy density, $\rho$ that gives $k=0$ when $\mathrm{\Lambda }=0$ is called the critical density: $${\rho }_c\equiv \frac{3H^2}{8\pi G_N}.$$ If the universe has higher density, $\rho \ge {\rho }_c$, then it is called "spatially closed": in this simple approximation the universe would eventually contract. On the other hand, if has lower density, $\rho \le {\rho }_c$, then it is called "spatially open" and expands forever. Therefore the geometry of the universe is directly connected to its density.Template:Rp

Density parameter

The density parameter Template:Mvar is defined as the ratio of the actual (or observed) density Template:Mvar to the critical density Template:Math of the Friedmann universe:Template:Rp $$\mathrm{\Omega }:=\frac{\rho }{{\rho }_c}=\frac{8\pi G\rho }{3H^2}.$$ Both the density $\rho (t)$ and the Hubble parameter $H(t)$ depend upon time and thus the density parameter varies with time.Template:Rp

The critical density is equivalent to approximately five atoms (of monatomic hydrogen) per cubic metre, whereas the average density of ordinary matter in the Universe is believed to be 0.2–0.25 atoms per cubic metre.

Estimated relative distribution for components of the energy density of the universe. Dark energy dominates the total energy (74%) while dark matter (22%) constitutes most of the mass. Of the remaining baryonic matter (4%), only one tenth is compact. In February 2015, the European-led research team behind the Planck cosmology probe released new data refining these values to 4.9% ordinary matter, 25.9% dark matter and 69.1% dark energy.

A much greater density comes from the unidentified dark matter, although both ordinary and dark matter contribute in favour of contraction of the universe. However, the largest part comes from so-called dark energy, which accounts for the cosmological constant term. Although the total density is equal to the critical density (exactly, up to measurement error), dark energy does not lead to contraction of the universe but rather may accelerate its expansion.

An expression for the critical density is found by assuming Template:Mvar to be zero (as it is for all basic Friedmann universes) and setting the normalised spatial curvature, Template:Mvar, equal to zero. When the substitutions are applied to the first of the Friedmann equations given the new $H_0$ value we find: $$\begin{array}{cc}\rho =\frac{3H_0^2}{8\pi G}& \approx 1.10\times 10^{-25}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}\\ & \approx 1.88\times 10^{-26}{\mathrm{h}}^2\mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}\\ & \approx 2.78\times 10^{11}{h}^2{M}_{\odot }{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{c}}^{-3}\end{array}$$where:

* $\begin{array}{cc}{H}_0& =76.5\pm 2.2\mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{c}}^{-1}\\ & \approx 75.6\times \frac{1000}{3.086\times 10^{22}}\\ & \approx 2.48\times 10^{-18}{s}^{-1}\end{array}$

* $h=\frac{H_0}{100\mathrm{k}\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}/\mathrm{M}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{c}}$

*${\rho }_c=8.5\times 10^{-27}\mathrm{k}\mathrm{g}/{\mathrm{m}}^3$

Given the value of dark energy to be ${\mathrm{\Omega }}_{\mathrm{\Lambda }}=0.647$ This term originally was used as a means to determine the spatial geometry of the universe, where Template:Math is the critical density for which the spatial geometry is flat (or Euclidean). Assuming a zero vacuum energy density, if Template:Mvar is larger than unity, the space sections of the universe are closed; the universe will eventually stop expanding, then collapse. If Template:Mvar is less than unity, they are open; and the universe expands forever. However, one can also subsume the spatial curvature and vacuum energy terms into a more general expression for Template:Mvar in which case this density parameter equals exactly unity. Then it is a matter of measuring the different components, usually designated by subscripts. According to the ΛCDM model, there are important components of Template:Mvar due to baryons, cold dark matter and dark energy. The spatial geometry of the universe has been measured by the WMAP spacecraft to be nearly flat. This means that the universe can be well approximated by a model where the spatial curvature parameter Template:Mvar is zero; however, this does not necessarily imply that the universe is infinite: it might merely be that the universe is much larger than the part we see.

The first Friedmann equation is often seen in terms of the present values of the density parameters, that is $$\frac{H^2}{H_0^2}={\mathrm{\Omega }}_{0,\mathrm{R}}{a}^{-4}+{\mathrm{\Omega }}_{0,\mathrm{M}}{a}^{-3}+{\mathrm{\Omega }}_{0,k}{a}^{-2}+{\mathrm{\Omega }}_{0,\mathrm{\Lambda }}.$$ Here Template:Math is the radiation density today (when Template:Math), Template:Math is the matter (dark plus baryonic) density today, Template:Math is the "spatial curvature density" today, and Template:Math is the cosmological constant or vacuum density today.

Other forms

Template:Unreferenced section These equations are sometimes simplified by replacing $$\begin{array}{cccc}\rho & \to \rho -\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }{c}^2}{8\pi G}& p& \to p+\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }{c}^4}{8\pi G}\end{array}$$ to give: $$\begin{array}{cc}{H}^2={\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)}^2& =\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho -\frac{k{c}^2}{a^2}\\ \dot{H}+H^2=\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}& =-\frac{4\pi G}{3}(\rho +\frac{3p}{c^2}).\end{array}$$

The simplified form of the second equation is invariant under this transformation.

The Hubble parameter can change over time if other parts of the equation are time dependent (in particular the mass density, the vacuum energy, or the spatial curvature). Evaluating the Hubble parameter at the present time yields Hubble's constant which is the proportionality constant of Hubble's law. Applied to a fluid with a given equation of state, the Friedmann equations yield the time evolution and geometry of the universe as a function of the fluid density.

We see that in the Friedmann equations, Template:Math does not depend on which coordinate system we chose for spatial slices. There are two commonly used choices for Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar which describe the same physics:

• Template:Math or Template:Math depending on whether the shape of the universe is a closed 3-sphere, flat (Euclidean space) or an open 3-hyperboloid, respectively. If Template:Math, then Template:Mvar is the radius of curvature of the universe. If Template:Math, then Template:Mvar may be fixed to any arbitrary positive number at one particular time. If Template:Math, then (loosely speaking) one can say that Template:Math is the radius of curvature of the universe.
• Template:Mvar is the scale factor which is taken to be 1 at the present time. Template:Mvar is the current spatial curvature (when Template:Math). If the shape of the universe is hyperspherical and Template:Math is the radius of curvature (Template:Math at the present), then Template:Math. If Template:Mvar is positive, then the universe is hyperspherical. If Template:Math, then the universe is Euclidean (flat). If Template:Mvar is negative, then the universe has hyperbolic geometry.

FLRW models

Relativisitic cosmology models based on the FLRW metric and obeying the Friedmann equations are called FRW models.Template:Rp Direct observation of stars has shown their velocities to be dominated by radial recession, validating these assumptions for cosmological models.Template:Rp These models are the basis of the standard model of Big Bang cosmological including the current ΛCDM model.Template:Rp

To apply the metric to cosmology and predict its time evolution via the scale factor $a(t)$ requires Einstein's field equations together with a way of calculating the density, $\rho (t),$ such as a cosmological equation of state. This process allows an approximate analytic solution Einstein's field equations $G_{\mu \nu }+\mathrm{\Lambda }{g}_{\mu \nu }=\kappa T_{\mu \nu }$ giving the Friedmann equations when the energy–momentum tensor is similarly assumed to be isotropic and homogeneous. The resulting equations are:

${\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)}^2+\frac{k{c}^2}{a^2}-\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }{c}^2}{3}=\frac{\kappa c^4}{3}\rho$

$2\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}+{\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)}^2+\frac{k{c}^2}{a^2}-\mathrm{\Lambda }{c}^2=-\kappa c^{2}p.$

Because the FLRW model assumes homogeneity, some popular accounts mistakenly assert that the Big Bang model cannot account for the observed lumpiness of the universe. In a strictly FLRW model, there are no clusters of galaxies or stars, since these are objects much denser than a typical part of the universe. Nonetheless, the FLRW model is used as a first approximation for the evolution of the real, lumpy universe because it is simple to calculate, and models that calculate the lumpiness in the universe are added onto the FLRW models as extensions. Most cosmologists agree that the observable universe is well approximated by an almost FLRW model, i.e., a model that follows the FLRW metric apart from primordial density fluctuations. Template:As of, the theoretical implications of the various extensions to the FLRW model appear to be well understood, and the goal is to make these consistent with observations from COBE and WMAP.

Interpretation

The pair of equations given above is equivalent to the following pair of equations

$\dot{\rho }=-3\frac{\dot{a}}{a}(\rho +\frac{p}{c^2})$

$\frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=-\frac{\kappa c^4}{6}(\rho +\frac{3p}{c^2})+\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }{c}^2}{3}$

with $k$, the spatial curvature index, serving as a constant of integration for the first equation.

The first equation can be derived also from thermodynamical considerations and is equivalent to the first law of thermodynamics, assuming the expansion of the universe is an adiabatic process (which is implicitly assumed in the derivation of the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric).

The second equation states that both the energy density and the pressure cause the expansion rate of the universe $\dot{a}$ to decrease, i.e., both cause a deceleration in the expansion of the universe. This is a consequence of gravitation, with pressure playing a similar role to that of energy (or mass) density, according to the principles of general relativity. The cosmological constant, on the other hand, causes an acceleration in the expansion of the universe.

Cosmological constant

The cosmological constant term can be omitted if we make the following replacements

$\rho \to \rho -\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }}{\kappa c^2}$

$p\to p+\frac{\mathrm{\Lambda }}{\kappa }.$

Therefore, the cosmological constant can be interpreted as arising from a form of energy that has negative pressure, equal in magnitude to its (positive) energy density:

$p=-\rho c^2,$

which is an equation of state of vacuum with dark energy.

An attempt to generalize this to

$p=w\rho c^2$

would not have general invariance without further modification.

In fact, in order to get a term that causes an acceleration of the universe expansion, it is enough to have a scalar field that satisfies

$p<-\frac{\rho c^2}{3}.$

Such a field is sometimes called quintessence.

Newtonian interpretation

This is due to McCrea and Milne, although sometimes incorrectly ascribed to Friedmann.Template:Whom The Friedmann equations are equivalent to this pair of equations:

$-a^3\dot{\rho }=3a^2\dot{a}\rho +\frac{3a^{2}p\dot{a}}{c^2}$

$\frac{{\dot{a}}^2}{2}-\frac{\kappa c^4{a}^3\rho }{6a}=-\frac{k{c}^2}{2}.$

The first equation says that the decrease in the mass contained in a fixed cube (whose side is momentarily a) is the amount that leaves through the sides due to the expansion of the universe plus the mass equivalent of the work done by pressure against the material being expelled. This is the conservation of mass–energy (first law of thermodynamics) contained within a part of the universe.

The second equation says that the kinetic energy (seen from the origin) of a particle of unit mass moving with the expansion plus its (negative) gravitational potential energy (relative to the mass contained in the sphere of matter closer to the origin) is equal to a constant related to the curvature of the universe. In other words, the energy (relative to the origin) of a co-moving particle in free-fall is conserved. General relativity merely adds a connection between the spatial curvature of the universe and the energy of such a particle: positive total energy implies negative curvature and negative total energy implies positive curvature.

The cosmological constant term is assumed to be treated as dark energy and thus merged into the density and pressure terms.

During the Planck epoch, one cannot neglect quantum effects. So they may cause a deviation from the Friedmann equations.

Useful solutions

The Friedmann equations can be solved exactly in presence of a perfect fluid with equation of state $$p=w\rho c^2,$$ where Template:Mvar is the pressure, Template:Mvar is the mass density of the fluid in the comoving frame and Template:Mvar is some constant.

In spatially flat case (Template:Math), the solution for the scale factor is $$a(t)=a_0{t}^{\frac{2}{3(w+1)}}$$ where Template:Math is some integration constant to be fixed by the choice of initial conditions. This family of solutions labelled by Template:Mvar is extremely important for cosmology. For example, Template:Math describes a matter-dominated universe, where the pressure is negligible with respect to the mass density. From the generic solution one easily sees that in a matter-dominated universe the scale factor goes as $$a(t)\propto t^{2/3}$$ matter-dominated Another important example is the case of a radiation-dominated universe, namely when Template:Math. This leads to $$a(t)\propto t^{1/2}$$ radiation-dominated

Note that this solution is not valid for domination of the cosmological constant, which corresponds to an Template:Math. In this case the energy density is constant and the scale factor grows exponentially.

Solutions for other values of Template:Mvar can be found at Template:Cite web

Mixtures

If the matter is a mixture of two or more non-interacting fluids each with such an equation of state, then $${\dot{\rho }}_f=-3H({\rho }_f+\frac{p_f}{c^2})$$ holds separately for each such fluid Template:Mvar. In each case, $${\dot{\rho }}_f=-3H({\rho }_f+w_f{\rho }_f)$$ from which we get $${\rho }_f\propto a^{-3(1+w_f)}.$$

For example, one can form a linear combination of such terms $$\rho =A{a}^{-3}+B{a}^{-4}+C{a}^0$$ where Template:Mvar is the density of "dust" (ordinary matter, Template:Math) when Template:Math; Template:Mvar is the density of radiation (Template:Math) when Template:Math; and Template:Mvar is the density of "dark energy" (Template:Math). One then substitutes this into $${\left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)}^2=\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho -\frac{k{c}^2}{a^2}$$ and solves for Template:Mvar as a function of time.

History

Alexander Friedmann

Friedmann published two cosmology papers in the 1922-1923 time frame. He adopted the same homogeneity and isotropy assumptions used by Albert Einstein and by Willem de Sitter in their papers, both published in 1917. Both of the earlier works also assumed the universe was static, eternally unchanging. Einstein postulated an additional term to his equations of general relativity to ensure this stability. In his paper, de Sitter showed that spacetime had curvature even in the absence of matter: the new equations of general relativity implied that a vacuum had properties that altered spacetime.Template:Rp

The idea of static universe was a fundamental assumption of philosophy and science. However, Friedmann abandoned the idea in his first paper "On the curvature of space". Starting with Einstein's 10 equations of relativity, Friedmann applies the symmetry of an isotropic universe and a simple model for mass-energy density to derive a relationship between that density and the curvature of spacetime. He demonstrates that in addition to one solution is static, many time dependent solutions also exist.Template:Rp

Friedmann's second paper, "On the possibility of a world with constant negative curvature," published in 1924 explored more complex geometrical ideas. This paper establish the idea that that the finiteness of spacetime was not a property that could be established based on the equations of general relativity alone: both finite and infinite geometries could be used to give solutions. Friedmann used two concepts of a three dimensional sphere as analogy: a trip at constant latitude could return to the starting point or the sphere might have an infinite number of sheets and the trip never repeats.Template:Rp

Friedmann's paper were largely ignored except – initially – by Einstein who actively dismissed them. However once Edwin Hubble published astronomical evidence that the universe was expanding, Einstein became convinced. Unfortunately for Friedmann, Georges Lemaître discovered some aspects of the same solutions and wrote persuasively about the concept of a universe born from a "primordial atom". Thus historians give these two scientists equal billing for the discovery.

In popular culture

Several students at Tsinghua University (CCP leader Xi Jinping's alma mater) participating in the 2022 COVID-19 protests in China carried placards with Friedmann equations scrawled on them, interpreted by some as a play on the words "Free man". Others have interpreted the use of the equations as a call to “open up” China and stop its Zero Covid policy, as the Friedmann equations relate to the expansion, or “opening” of the universe.

See also

• Mathematics of general relativity
• Solutions of the Einstein field equations

Further reading

• Template:Cite book