Metallicity

From testwiki
Revision as of 01:06, 28 January 2025 by imported>Citation bot (Altered url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Nedia020415 | Category:All articles with broken links to citations | #UCB_Category 131/142)
(diff) โ† Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision โ†’ (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:For

The globular cluster M80. Stars in globular clusters are mainly older metal-poor members of population II.

In astronomy, metallicity is the abundance of elements present in an object that are heavier than hydrogen and helium. Most of the normal currently detectable (i.e. non-dark) matter in the universe is either hydrogen or helium, and astronomers use the word "metals" as convenient shorthand for "all elements except hydrogen and helium". This word-use is distinct from the conventional chemical or physical definition of a metal as an electrically conducting solid. Stars and nebulae with relatively high abundances of heavier elements are called "metal-rich" when discussing metallicity, even though many of those elements are called nonmetals in chemistry. Template:TOC limit

Metals in early spectroscopy

Solar spectrum with Fraunhofer lines as it appears visually.

In 1802, William Hyde Wollaston[1] noted the appearance of a number of dark features in the solar spectrum.[2] In 1814, Joseph von Fraunhofer independently rediscovered the lines and began to systematically study and measure their wavelengths, and they are now called Fraunhofer lines. He mapped over 570 lines, designating the most prominent with the letters A through K and weaker lines with other letters.[3][4][5]

About 45 years later, Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen[6] noticed that several Fraunhofer lines coincide with characteristic emission lines identifies in the spectra of heated chemical elements.[7] They inferred that dark lines in the solar spectrum are caused by absorption by chemical elements in the solar atmosphere.[8] Their observations[9] were in the visible range where the strongest lines come from metals such as sodium, potassium, and iron.[10] In the early work on the chemical composition of the sun the only elements that were detected in spectra were hydrogen and various metals,[11]Template:Rp with the term metallic frequently used when describing them.[11]Template:Rp In contemporary usage in astronomy all the extra elements beyond just hydrogen and helium are termed metallic.

Origin of metallic elements

Template:See also The presence of heavier elements results from stellar nucleosynthesis, where the majority of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium in the Universe (metals, hereafter) are formed in the cores of stars as they evolve. Over time, stellar winds and supernovae deposit the metals into the surrounding environment, enriching the interstellar medium and providing recycling materials for the birth of new stars. It follows that older generations of stars, which formed in the metal-poor early Universe, generally have lower metallicities than those of younger generations, which formed in a more metal-rich Universe.

Stellar populations

Population I star Rigel with reflection nebula IC 2118

Observed changes in the chemical abundances of different types of stars, based on the spectral peculiarities that were later attributed to metallicity, led astronomer Walter Baade in 1944 to propose the existence of two different populations of stars.[12] These became commonly known as Template:Nobr (metal-rich) and Template:Nobr (metal-poor) stars. A third, earliest stellar population was hypothesized in 1978, known as Template:Nobr stars.[13][14][15] These "extremely metal-poor" (XMP) stars are theorized to have been the "first-born" stars created in the Universe.

Common methods of calculation

Astronomers use several different methods to describe and approximate metal abundances, depending on the available tools and the object of interest. Some methods include determining the fraction of mass that is attributed to gas versus metals, or measuring the ratios of the number of atoms of two different elements as compared to the ratios found in the Sun.

Mass fraction

Stellar composition is often simply defined by the parameters Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar. Here Template:Mvar represents the mass fraction of hydrogen, Template:Mvar is the mass fraction of helium, and Template:Mvar is the mass fraction of all the remaining chemical elements. Thus

X+Y+Z=1

In most stars, nebulae, [[H II region|HTemplate:Sup regions]], and other astronomical sources, hydrogen and helium are the two dominant elements. The hydrogen mass fraction is generally expressed as  Xm๐–งM , where Template:Mvar is the total mass of the system, and  m๐–ง  is the mass of the hydrogen it contains. Similarly, the helium mass fraction is denoted as  Ym๐–ง๐–พM. The remainder of the elements are collectively referred to as "metals", and the mass fraction of metals is calculated as

Z=e>๐–ง๐–พmeM=1XY.

For the surface of the Sun (symbol ), these parameters are measured to have the following values:[16]

Description Solar value
Hydrogen mass fraction  X=0.7381 
Helium mass fraction  Y=0.2485 
Metal mass fraction  Z=0.0134 

Due to the effects of stellar evolution, neither the initial composition nor the present day bulk composition of the Sun is the same as its present-day surface composition.

Chemical abundance ratios

The overall stellar metallicity is conventionally defined using the total hydrogen content, since its abundance is considered to be relatively constant in the Universe, or the iron content of the star, which has an abundance that is generally linearly increasing in time in the Universe.[17] Hence, iron can be used as a chronological indicator of nucleosynthesis. Iron is relatively easy to measure with spectral observations in the star's spectrum given the large number of iron lines in the star's spectra (even though oxygen is the most abundant heavy element โ€“ see [[#H-II-region-anchor|metallicities in HTemplate:Sup regions]] below). The abundance ratio is the common logarithm of the ratio of a star's iron abundance compared to that of the Sun and is calculated thus:[18]

[๐–ฅ๐–พ๐–ง]=log10(N๐–ฅ๐–พN๐–ง)log10(N๐–ฅ๐–พN๐–ง) ,

where  N๐–ฅ๐–พ  and  N๐–ง  are the number of iron and hydrogen atoms per unit of volume respectively, is the standard symbol for the Sun, and for a star (often omitted below). The unit often used for metallicity is the dex, contraction of "decimal exponent".[19] By this formulation, stars with a higher metallicity than the Sun have a positive common logarithm, whereas those more dominated by hydrogen have a corresponding negative value. For example, stars with a  [๐–ฅ๐–พ๐–ง]  value of +1 have 10 times the metallicity of the Sun (Template:10^); conversely, those with a  [๐–ฅ๐–พ๐–ง]  value of −1 have Template:Sfrac, while those with a  [๐–ฅ๐–พ๐–ง]  value of 0 have the same metallicity as the Sun, and so on.[20]

Young population I stars have significantly higher iron-to-hydrogen ratios than older population II stars. Primordial population III stars are estimated to have metallicity less than −6, a millionth of the abundance of iron in the Sun.[21][22] The same notation is used to express variations in abundances between other individual elements as compared to solar proportions. For example, the notation  [๐–ฎ๐–ฅ๐–พ]  represents the difference in the logarithm of the star's oxygen abundance versus its iron content compared to that of the Sun. In general, a given stellar nucleosynthetic process alters the proportions of only a few elements or isotopes, so a star or gas sample with certain  [?๐–ฅ๐–พ]  values may well be indicative of an associated, studied nuclear process.

Photometric colors

Astronomers can estimate metallicities through measured and calibrated systems that correlate photometric measurements and spectroscopic measurements (see also Spectrophotometry). For example, the Johnson UVB filters can be used to detect an ultraviolet (UV) excess in stars,[23] where a smaller UV excess indicates a larger presence of metals that absorb the UV radiation, thereby making the star appear "redder".[24][25][26] The UV excess, Template:Mvar(Uโˆ’B), is defined as the difference between a star's U and B band magnitudes, compared to the difference between U and B band magnitudes of metal-rich stars in the Hyades cluster.[27] Unfortunately, Template:Mvar(Uโˆ’B) is sensitive to both metallicity and temperature: If two stars are equally metal-rich, but one is cooler than the other, they will likely have different Template:Mvar(Uโˆ’B) values[27] (see also Blanketing effect[28][29]). To help mitigate this degeneracy, a star's Bโˆ’V color index can be used as an indicator for temperature. Furthermore, the UV excess and Bโˆ’V index can be corrected to relate the Template:Mvar(Uโˆ’B) value to iron abundances.[30][31][32]

Other photometric systems that can be used to determine metallicities of certain astrophysical objects include the Strำงmgren system,[33][34] the Geneva system,[35][36] the Washington system,[37][38] and the DDO system.[39][40]

Metallicities in various astrophysical objects

Stars

At a given mass and age, a metal-poor star will be slightly warmer. Template:Nobr metallicities are roughly Template:Sfrac to Template:Sfrac of the Sun's ( [๐–ฅ๐–พ๐–ง] =3.0 ... 1.0 ) , but the group appears cooler than Template:Nobr overall, as heavy population II stars have long since died. Above 40 solar masses, metallicity influences how a star will die: Outside the pair-instability window, lower metallicity stars will collapse directly to a black hole, while higher metallicity stars undergo a type Ib/c supernova and may leave a neutron star.

Relationship between stellar metallicity and planets

A star's metallicity measurement is one parameter that helps determine whether a star may have a giant planet, as there is a direct correlation between metallicity and the presence of a giant planet. Measurements have demonstrated the connection between a star's metallicity and gas giant planets, like Jupiter and Saturn. The more metals in a star and thus its planetary system and protoplanetary disk, the more likely the system may have gas giant planets. Current models show that the metallicity along with the correct planetary system temperature and distance from the star are key to planet and planetesimal formation. For two stars that have equal age and mass but different metallicity, the less metallic star is bluer. Among stars of the same color, less metallic stars emit more ultraviolet radiation. The Sun, with eight planets and nine consensus dwarf planets, is used as the reference, with a  [๐–ฅ๐–พ๐–ง]  of 0.00.[41][42][43][44][45]

HTemplate:Sup regions

Young, massive and hot stars (typically of spectral types O and B) in [[H II region|HTemplate:Sup regions]] emit UV photons that ionize ground-state hydrogen atoms, knocking electrons free; this process is known as photoionization. The free electrons can strike other atoms nearby, exciting bound metallic electrons into a metastable state, which eventually decay back into a ground state, emitting photons with energies that correspond to forbidden lines. Through these transitions, astronomers have developed several observational methods to estimate metal abundances in HTemplate:Sup regions, where the stronger the forbidden lines in spectroscopic observations, the higher the metallicity.[46][47] These methods are dependent on one or more of the following: the variety of asymmetrical densities inside HTemplate:Sup regions, the varied temperatures of the embedded stars, and/or the electron density within the ionized region.[48][49][50][51]

Theoretically, to determine the total abundance of a single element in an HTemplate:Sup region, all transition lines should be observed and summed. However, this can be observationally difficult due to variation in line strength.[52][53] Some of the most common forbidden lines used to determine metal abundances in HTemplate:Sup regions are from oxygen (e.g. [OTemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = (3727, 7318, 7324) ร…, and [OTemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = (4363, 4959, 5007) ร…), nitrogen (e.g. [NTemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = (5755, 6548, 6584) ร…), and sulfur (e.g. [STemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = (6717, 6731) ร… and [STemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = (6312, 9069, 9531) ร…) in the optical spectrum, and the [OTemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = (52, 88) ฮผm and [NTemplate:Sup] Template:Mvar = 57 ฮผm lines in the infrared spectrum. Oxygen has some of the stronger, more abundant lines in HTemplate:Sup regions, making it a main target for metallicity estimates within these objects. To calculate metal abundances in HTemplate:Sup regions using oxygen flux measurements, astronomers often use the Template:Mvar23 method, in which

R23= [ ๐–ฎ๐–จ๐–จ]3727Å+[ ๐–ฎ๐–จ๐–จ๐–จ]4959Å+5007Å [ ๐–งβ]4861Å ,

where  [ ๐–ฎ๐–จ๐–จ]3727Å+[ ๐–ฎ๐–จ๐–จ๐–จ]4959Å+5007Å  is the sum of the fluxes from oxygen emission lines measured at the rest frame Template:Mvar = (3727, 4959 and 5007) ร… wavelengths, divided by the flux from the Balmer series HTemplate:Sub emission line at the rest frame Template:Mvar = 4861 ร… wavelength.[54] This ratio is well defined through models and observational studies,[55][56][57] but caution should be taken, as the ratio is often degenerate, providing both a low and high metallicity solution, which can be broken with additional line measurements.[58] Similarly, other strong forbidden line ratios can be used, e.g. for sulfur, where[59]

S23= [ ๐–ฒ๐–จ๐–จ]6716Å+6731Å+[ ๐–ฒ๐–จ๐–จ๐–จ]9069Å+9532Å [ ๐–งβ]4861Å.

Metal abundances within HTemplate:Sup regions are typically less than 1%, with the percentage decreasing on average with distance from the Galactic Center.[52][60][61][62][63]

See also

Template:Clear

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

Further reading

Template:Star Template:Portal bar

  1. โ†‘ Melvyn C. Usselman: William Hyde Wollaston Encyclopรฆdia Britannica, retrieved 31 March 2013
  2. โ†‘ William Hyde Wollaston (1802) "A method of examining refractive and dispersive powers, by prismatic reflection," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 92: 365โ€“380; see especially p. 378.
  3. โ†‘ Template:Cite book
  4. โ†‘ Joseph Fraunhofer (1814 - 1815) "Bestimmung des Brechungs- und des Farben-Zerstreuungs - Vermรถgens verschiedener Glasarten, in Bezug auf die Vervollkommnung achromatischer Fernrรถhre" (Determination of the refractive and color-dispersing power of different types of glass, in relation to the improvement of achromatic telescopes), Denkschriften der Kรถniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Mรผnchen (Memoirs of the Royal Academy of Sciences in Munich), 5: 193โ€“226; see especially pages 202โ€“205 and the plate following page 226.
  5. โ†‘ Template:Cite book
  6. โ†‘ See:
    • Gustav Kirchhoff (1859) "Ueber die Fraunhofer'schen Linien" (On Fraunhofer's lines), Monatsbericht der Kรถniglichen Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Monthly report of the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin), 662โ€“665.
    • Gustav Kirchhoff (1859) "Ueber das Sonnenspektrum" (On the sun's spectrum), Verhandlungen des naturhistorisch-medizinischen Vereins zu Heidelberg (Proceedings of the Natural History / Medical Association in Heidelberg), 1 (7) : 251โ€“255.
  7. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  8. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  9. โ†‘ Template:Cite web
  10. โ†‘ Template:Cite web
  11. โ†‘ 11.0 11.1 Template:Cite book
  12. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  13. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  14. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  15. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  16. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  17. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  18. โ†‘ Template:Cite book
  19. โ†‘ Template:Cite book
  20. โ†‘ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Martin
  21. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  22. โ†‘ Template:Cite news
  23. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  24. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  25. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  26. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  27. โ†‘ 27.0 27.1 Template:Cite journal
  28. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  29. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  30. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  31. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  32. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  33. โ†‘ Template:Cite book
  34. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  35. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  36. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  37. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  38. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  39. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  40. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  41. โ†‘ Template:Cite web
  42. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  43. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  44. โ†‘ Template:Cite magazine
  45. โ†‘ Template:Cite conference Template:Citation not found
    Missing article's page numbers are imbedded in:
    Template:Cite conference
  46. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  47. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  48. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  49. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  50. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  51. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  52. โ†‘ 52.0 52.1 Template:Cite book
  53. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  54. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  55. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  56. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  57. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  58. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  59. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  60. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  61. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal
  62. โ†‘ Template:Cite book
  63. โ†‘ Template:Cite journal