Bohr–Mollerup theorem
Template:Short description In mathematical analysis, the Bohr–Mollerup theorem[1][2] is a theorem proved by the Danish mathematicians Harald Bohr and Johannes Mollerup.[3] The theorem characterizes the gamma function, defined for Template:Math by
as the only positive function Template:Mvar, with domain on the interval Template:Math, that simultaneously has the following three properties:
- Template:Math, and
- Template:Math for Template:Math and
- Template:Mvar is logarithmically convex.
A treatment of this theorem is in Artin's book The Gamma Function,[4] which has been reprinted by the AMS in a collection of Artin's writings.[5]
The theorem was first published in a textbook on complex analysis, as Bohr and Mollerup thought it had already been proved.[3]
The theorem admits a far-reaching generalization to a wide variety of functions (that have convexity or concavity properties of any order).[6]
Statement
- Bohr–Mollerup Theorem. Template:Math is the only function that satisfies Template:Math with Template:Math convex and also with Template:Math.
Proof
Let Template:Math be a function with the assumed properties established above: Template:Math and Template:Math is convex, and Template:Math. From Template:Math we can establish
The purpose of the stipulation that Template:Math forces the Template:Math property to duplicate the factorials of the integers so we can conclude now that Template:Math if Template:Math and if Template:Math exists at all. Because of our relation for Template:Math, if we can fully understand Template:Math for Template:Math then we understand Template:Math for all values of Template:Mvar.
For Template:Math, Template:Math, the slope Template:Math of the line segment connecting the points Template:Math and Template:Math is monotonically increasing in each argument with Template:Math since we have stipulated that Template:Math is convex. Thus, we know that
After simplifying using the various properties of the logarithm, and then exponentiating (which preserves the inequalities since the exponential function is monotonically increasing) we obtain
From previous work this expands to
and so
The last line is a strong statement. In particular, it is true for all values of Template:Mvar. That is Template:Math is not greater than the right hand side for any choice of Template:Mvar and likewise, Template:Math is not less than the left hand side for any other choice of Template:Mvar. Each single inequality stands alone and may be interpreted as an independent statement. Because of this fact, we are free to choose different values of Template:Mvar for the RHS and the LHS. In particular, if we keep Template:Mvar for the RHS and choose Template:Math for the LHS we get:
It is evident from this last line that a function is being sandwiched between two expressions, a common analysis technique to prove various things such as the existence of a limit, or convergence. Let Template:Math:
so the left side of the last inequality is driven to equal the right side in the limit and
is sandwiched in between. This can only mean that
In the context of this proof this means that
has the three specified properties belonging to Template:Math. Also, the proof provides a specific expression for Template:Math. And the final critical part of the proof is to remember that the limit of a sequence is unique. This means that for any choice of Template:Math only one possible number Template:Math can exist. Therefore, there is no other function with all the properties assigned to Template:Math.
The remaining loose end is the question of proving that Template:Math makes sense for all Template:Mvar where
exists. The problem is that our first double inequality
was constructed with the constraint Template:Math. If, say, Template:Math then the fact that Template:Mvar is monotonically increasing would make Template:Math, contradicting the inequality upon which the entire proof is constructed. However,
which demonstrates how to bootstrap Template:Math to all values of Template:Mvar where the limit is defined.