Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2025 February 10

From testwiki
Revision as of 03:17, 25 February 2025 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving February 10)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < February 9 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jan | February | Mar >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


February 10

Why this equation has no solutions ?

Take SA, a semiprime, why is there no solution to this equation

(25² + x×SA)÷(67×y) == (z×SA)²

I’m meaning finding integers x and y and z such as the equation is true and where z≠0 ? 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:E9E3:F9ED:9B83:6DB8 (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

I'm not certain what SA is supposed to be but if it is 1 and z is 1 then it is quite easy to get a solution of x=45 and y=10. NadVolum (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, edited. SA is semiprime. 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:C965:8D1D:CEAE:ABA0 (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Multiplying both sides by 67y and taking both sides modulo SA, we see that 252=54 would have to be congruent to 0(modSA). In other words, 54 would have to be a multiple of a semiprime, which is impossible since it only has one prime factor. GalacticShoe (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
and if 25 was replaced by a square which is a multiple of the semiprime, would it works ? In reality 25 can be any perfect square, it doesn’t have to be 25. 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:C965:8D1D:CEAE:ABA0 (talk) 02:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
The equation
((m×SA)2)2+x×SA67×y=(z×SA)2
is a linear equation in x. It has a unique solution for any choice of non-zero SA, m, non-zero y, and z. If all of these are integers, then so is x.  ‑‑Lambiam 06:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
With m being a perfect square ? If yes, how to compute it ? 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:C965:8D1D:CEAE:ABA0 (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
You wrote, "if 25 was replaced by a square which is a multiple of the semiprime". Well, (m×SA)2 is a square that is a multiple of SA. You don't need to compute m; m can be set to any value that you wish, including squares, so you can take m=100, or m=1, or even m=0. Aren't you overdoing the squaring? If m=a2 and you expand the brackets, you end up with a222SA22=a8SA4.  ‑‑Lambiam 21:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Yes, that’s correct, with the ² m is a perfect square by construction. But how to find a value of m such as a solution of x and y and z exists ? 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:88B1:8A9D:F4E0:D37A (talk) 07:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Take m=1.  ‑‑Lambiam 09:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)