Williams diagram

From testwiki
Revision as of 13:15, 11 January 2025 by imported>Aadirulez8 (v2.05 - Auto / Fix errors for CW project (Link equal to linktext))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In combustion, Williams diagram refers to a classification diagram of different turbulent combustion regimes in a plane, having turbulent Reynolds number Rel as the x-axis and turbulent Damköhler number Dal as the y-axis.[1] The diagram is named after Forman A. Williams (1985).[2] The definition of the two non-dimensionaless numbers are[3]

Rel=ulν,Dal=l/utch

where u is the rms turbulent velocity flucturation, l is the integral length scale, ν is the kinematic viscosity and tch is the chemical time scale. The Reynolds number Reλ based on the Taylor microscale λ=l/Rel becomes Reλ=Rel. The Damköhler number based on the Kolmogorov time scale tη=νl/u3 is given by Daη=Dal/Rel. The Karlovitz number Ka=tch/tη is defined by Ka=Rel/Dal.

The Williams diagram is universal in the sense that it is applicable to both premixed and non-premixed combustion. In supersonic combustion and detonations, the diagram becomes three-dimensional due to the addition of the Mach number Ma=u/c as the z-axis, where c is the sound speed.[4]

Borghi–Peters diagram

In premixed combustion, an alternate diagram, known as the Borghi–Peters diagram, is also used to describe different regimes. This diagram is named after Roland Borghi (1985) and Norbert Peters (1986).[5][6] The Borghi–Peters diagram uses l/δL as the x-axis and u/SL as the y-axis, where δL and SL are the thickness and speed of the planar, laminar premixed flame. Since δLPr=ν/SL, where Pr is the Prandtl number (set Pr=1), and tch=δL/SL in premixed flames, we have

Rel=uSLlδL,Dal=l/δLu/SL,lδL=RelDal,uSL=RelDal

The limitations of the Borghi–Peters diagram are that (1) it cannot be used for non-premixed combustion and (2) it is not suitable for practically relevant cases where both Rel and Dal are increased concurrently, such as increasing nozzle radius while maintaining constant nozzle exit velocity.[7]

References

Template:Reflist

  1. Williams, F. A. (2000). Progress in knowledge of flamelet structure and extinction. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26(4-6), 657-682.
  2. Williams, F. A. (1985). Turbulent combustion. In The mathematics of combustion (pp. 97-131). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  3. Liñán, A., & Williams, F. A. (1993). Fundamental aspects of combustion. Oxford university press.
  4. Rauch, A. H., & Chelliah, H. K. (2020). On the ambiguity of premixed flame thickness definition of highly pre-heated mixtures and its implication on turbulent combustion regimes. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 24(4), 573-588.
  5. Borghi, R. (1985). On the structure and morphology of turbulent premixed flames. In Recent advances in the aerospace sciences: In honor of luigi crocco on his seventy-fifth birthday (pp. 117-138). Boston, MA: Springer US.
  6. Peters, N. (1988, January). Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion. In Symposium (International) on combustion (Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1231-1250). Elsevier.
  7. Song, W., Hernández Pérez, F. E., & Im, H. G. (2023). Turbulent hydrogen flames: physics and modeling implications. In Hydrogen for Future Thermal Engines (pp. 237-266). Cham: Springer International Publishing.