Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 September 26

From testwiki
Revision as of 05:05, 11 October 2024 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving September 26)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < September 25 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Aug | September | Oct >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


September 26

Given the optimal ate pairing e(A,B)=y is to possible to determine I and J such as e(I,J)=2y or even e(I,J)=3y?

Simple question : let’s say I have a pairing friendly curve having a very large trace, and that I have a pairing with points A∈G1 and B∈G2 such as the optimal ate pairing e(A,B)=y, then is it possible to fully determine 2 point I and J such as e(I,J) equals a target multiple of the finite’s field element y ?

Or does it requires full pairing or full generalized Miller’s inversion and thus would be impossible in practice on a curve like bn254 ? 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:9CB:33F3:E8EB:8A5D (talk) 15:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)