Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2024 May 23

From testwiki
Revision as of 03:43, 7 June 2024 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving May 23)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < May 22 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Apr | May | Jun >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


May 23

Differential Equation

Does the differential equation x2 * d2x/dt2 = k have a name? (All I've figured out about this so far is that I don't remember enough about differential equations. I'm not getting anything on solving it except errors.) Thank you. RJFJR (talk) 02:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

As to a solution, you could guess that one might be some power of t and accordingly substitute x=Atp (where A and p are constants), then solve for p and then solve for A. catslash (talk) 09:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Then, since nothing in the equation depends on the absolute value of t, you could apply an arbitrary time-shift to get a slightly more general solution x=A(tt0)p. catslash (talk) 09:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
You're right. Thank you. p=2/3, I was not expecting that. I appreciate it. RJFJR (talk) 14:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This is an autonomous second order equation. If you write x¨kx2=0 and multiply with x˙, you find ddt(12x˙2+kx)=0 so 12x˙2+kx=C for some constant C. Solve for x˙ and you get a separable first order equation. —Kusma (talk) 14:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. I need to dig out the old textbook and start reading. RJFJR (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
catslash's solution is a one-parameter family (indexed by t0) of very nice solutions, but in general you should be able to solve the initial value problem for any initial values of x and x˙, so you'll get a two parameter family. It is easy to show that the solution exists; you can get an implicit formula from Mathematica or other symbolic computation software. —Kusma (talk) 12:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Autonomous system (mathematics)#Special case: x″ = f(x) gives t as a two-parameter function of x, but this function looks uninvertable except for the choice of the parameter C1 which makes it correspond to my guessed solution. catslash (talk) 22:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)