Draft:Semantic Brand Score
Template:Short description Template:Draft topics Template:AFC submission Template:AFC submission Template:AFC submission Template:AFC submission
Template:AfC commentTemplate:AFC comment
The Semantic Brand Score (SBS) is a measure of brand importance that is calculated on textual data[1][2][3]. The measure is rooted in graph theory and partly connected to Keller's[4] conceptualization of brand equity[5]. The metric has been computed by examining different text sources, such as newspaper articles, online forums, scientific papers, or social media posts[6][7][8].
Definition and calculation
Pre-processing
To compute the Semantic Brand Score, it is necessary to convert the analyzed texts into word networks, i.e., graphs where each node signifies a word. Connections between words are formed based on their co-occurrence within a specified distance threshold (a number of words). Natural language pre-processing is usually conducted to refine texts, which involves tasks such as removing stopwords and applying stemming[9] to eliminate word affixes. Here is a sample network derived from pre-processing the sentence "The dawn is the appearance of light - usually golden, pink or purple - before sunrise".
The SBS is a composite indicator with three dimensions: prevalence, diversity and connectitivy[10][11][12]. SBS measures brand importance, a construct that cannot be understood by examining a single dimension alone[5].
Prevalence
Prevalence measures the frequency of brand name usage, indicating how often a brand is explicitly referenced in a corpus. The prevalence factor is associated with brand awareness, suggesting that a brand mentioned frequently in a text is more familiar to its authors[10][11][8]. Likewise, frequent mentions of a brand name enhance its recognition and recall among readers.
Diversity
Diversity assesses the variety of words linked with a brand, focusing on textual associations. These textual associations refer to the words used alongside a particular brand or term. Measurement involves employing the degree centrality indicator, reflecting the number of connections a brand node has in the semantic network[1]. Alternatively, an approach using distinctiveness centrality[13] has been proposed, assigning greater significance to unique brand associations and reducing redundancy. The rationale is that distinctive textual associations enrich discussions about a brand, thereby enhancing its memorability.
Diversity can be calculated for the brand node in a semantic network, i.e., a weighted undirected graph G, made of n nodes and m arcs. If two nodes, i and j, are not connected, then , otherwise the weight of the arc connecting them is . In the following, is the degree of node j and is the indicator function which equals 1 if , i.e. if there is an arc connecting nodes i and j.
.
Connectivity
Connectivity evaluates a brand's connective power within broader discourse, indicating its capacity to serve as a bridge between various words/concepts (nodes) in the network[1][2][3][12]. It captures a brand's brokerage power, its ability to connect different words, groups of words, or topics together. The calculation hinges on the weighted betweenness centrality metric[3].[14]
The Semantic Brand Score indicator is given by the sum of the standardized values of prevalence, diversity, and connectivity[1][10][11]. SBS standardization is typically performed by subtracting the mean from the raw scores of each dimension and then dividing by the standard deviation [3]. This process takes into account the scores of all relevant words in the corpus.
See also
- Big data
- Brand equity
- Brand management
- Brand valuation
- Graph theory
- Natural language processing
- Network theory
- Semantic analytics
- Social network analysis
- Text mining
References
External links
- https://towardsdatascience.com/calculating-the-semantic-brand-score-with-python-3f94fb8372a6. Tutorial for the calculation of the Semantic Brand Score using Python
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite news
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Template:Cite book
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal