Draft:Semantic Brand Score

From testwiki
Revision as of 11:40, 22 November 2024 by imported>Bhashaji (AFC submission declined due to no reliable source showing)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Draft topics Template:AFC submission Template:AFC submission Template:AFC submission Template:AFC submission

Template:AfC commentTemplate:AFC comment

Template:AFC comment

Template:AFC comment



The Semantic Brand Score (SBS) is a measure of brand importance that is calculated on textual data[1][2][3]. The measure is rooted in graph theory and partly connected to Keller's[4] conceptualization of brand equity[5]. The metric has been computed by examining different text sources, such as newspaper articles, online forums, scientific papers, or social media posts[6][7][8].

Definition and calculation

Pre-processing

To compute the Semantic Brand Score, it is necessary to convert the analyzed texts into word networks, i.e., graphs where each node signifies a word. Connections between words are formed based on their co-occurrence within a specified distance threshold (a number of words). Natural language pre-processing is usually conducted to refine texts, which involves tasks such as removing stopwords and applying stemming[9] to eliminate word affixes. Here is a sample network derived from pre-processing the sentence "The dawn is the appearance of light - usually golden, pink or purple - before sunrise".

The SBS is a composite indicator with three dimensions: prevalence, diversity and connectitivy[10][11][12]. SBS measures brand importance, a construct that cannot be understood by examining a single dimension alone[5].

Prevalence

Prevalence measures the frequency of brand name usage, indicating how often a brand is explicitly referenced in a corpus. The prevalence factor is associated with brand awareness, suggesting that a brand mentioned frequently in a text is more familiar to its authors[10][11][8]. Likewise, frequent mentions of a brand name enhance its recognition and recall among readers.

Diversity

Diversity assesses the variety of words linked with a brand, focusing on textual associations. These textual associations refer to the words used alongside a particular brand or term. Measurement involves employing the degree centrality indicator, reflecting the number of connections a brand node has in the semantic network[1]. Alternatively, an approach using distinctiveness centrality[13] has been proposed, assigning greater significance to unique brand associations and reducing redundancy. The rationale is that distinctive textual associations enrich discussions about a brand, thereby enhancing its memorability.

Diversity can be calculated for the brand node in a semantic network, i.e., a weighted undirected graph G, made of n nodes and m arcs. If two nodes, i and j, are not connected, then wij=0, otherwise the weight of the arc connecting them is wij1. In the following, gj is the degree of node j and I(f) is the indicator function which equals 1 if f=TRUE, i.e. if there is an arc connecting nodes i and j.

DI(i)=j=1,jinlog10n1gjI(wij>0).

Connectivity

Connectivity evaluates a brand's connective power within broader discourse, indicating its capacity to serve as a bridge between various words/concepts (nodes) in the network[1][2][3][12]. It captures a brand's brokerage power, its ability to connect different words, groups of words, or topics together. The calculation hinges on the weighted betweenness centrality metric[3].[14]

The Semantic Brand Score indicator is given by the sum of the standardized values of prevalence, diversity, and connectivity[1][10][11]. SBS standardization is typically performed by subtracting the mean from the raw scores of each dimension and then dividing by the standard deviation [3]. This process takes into account the scores of all relevant words in the corpus.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Template:Draft categories