Kármán–Moore theory

From testwiki
Revision as of 17:03, 5 July 2024 by imported>John of Reading (Fixed some spellings)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Kármán–Moore theory is a linearized theory for supersonic flows over a slender body, named after Theodore von Kármán and Norton B. Moore, who developed the theory in 1932.[1][2] The theory, in particular, provides an explicit formula for the wave drag, which converts the kinetic energy of the moving body into outgoing sound waves behind the body.Template:R

Mathematical description

Consider a slender body with pointed edges at the front and back. The supersonic flow past this body will be nearly parallel to the x-axis everywhere since the shock waves formed (one at the leading edge and one at the trailing edge) will be weak; as a consequence, the flow will be potential everywhere, which can be described using the velocity potential φ=xv1+ϕ, where v1 is the incoming uniform velocity and ϕ characterising the small deviation from the uniform flow. In the linearized theory, ϕ satisfies

2ϕy2+2ϕz2β22ϕx2=0,

where β2=(v12c12)/c12=M121, c1 is the sound speed in the incoming flow and M1 is the Mach number of the incoming flow. This is just the two-dimensional wave equation and ϕ is a disturbance propagated with an apparent time x/v1 and with an apparent velocity v1/β.

Let the origin (x,y,z)=(0,0,0) be located at the leading end of the pointed body. Further, let S(x) be the cross-sectional area (perpendicular to the x-axis) and l be the length of the slender body, so that S(x)=0 for x<0 and for x>1. Of course, in supersonic flows, disturbances (i.e., ϕ) can be propagated only into the region behind the Mach cone. The weak Mach cone for the leading-edge is given by xβr=0, whereas the weak Mach cone for the trailing edge is given by xβr=l, where r2=y2+z2 is the squared radial distance from the x-axis.

The disturbance far away from the body is just like a cylindrical wave propagation. In front of the cone xβr=0, the solution is simply given by ϕ=0. Between the cones xβr=0 and xβr=l, the solution is given by[3]

ϕ(x,r)=v12π0xβrS(ξ)dξ(xξ)2β2r2

whereas the behind the cone xβr=l, the solution is given by

ϕ(x,r)=v12π0lS(ξ)dξ(xξ)2β2r2.

The solution described above is exact for all r when the slender body is a solid of revolution. If this is not the case, the solution is valid at large distances will have correction associated with the non-linear distortion of the shock profile, whose strength is proportional to (M11)1/8r3/4 and a factor depending on the shape function S(x).[4]

The drag force F is just the x-component of the momentum per unit time. To calculate this, consider a cylindrical surface with a large radius and with an axis along the x-axis. The momentum flux density crossing through this surface is simply given by Πxr=ρvr(v1+vx)ρ1(ϕ/r)(v1+ϕ/x). Integrating Πxr over the cylindrical surface gives the drag force. Due to symmetry, the first term in Πxr upon integration gives zero since the net mass flux ρvr is zero on the cylindrical surface considered. The second term gives the non-zero contribution,

F=2πrρ1ϕrϕxdx.

At large distances, the values xξβr (the wave region) are the most important in the solution for ϕ; this is because, as mentioned earlier, ϕ is a like disturbance propating with a speed v1/β with an apparent time x/v1. This means that we can approximate the expression in the denominator as (xξ)2β2r22βr(xξβr). Then we can write, for example,

ϕ(x,r)=v12π2βr0xβrS(ξ)dξxξβr=v12π2βr0S(xβrs)dss,s=xξβr,r1.

From this expression, we can calculate ϕ/r, which is also equal to βϕ/x since we are in the wave region. The factor 1/r appearing in front of the integral need not to be differentiated since this gives rise to the small correction proportional to 1/r. Effecting the differentiation and returning to the original variables, we find

ϕr=βϕx=v12πβ2r0xβrS(ξ)dξxξβr.

Substituting this in the drag force formula gives us

F=ρ1v124π0X0XS(ξ1)S(ξ2)dξ1dξ2dX(Xξ1)(Xξ2),X=xβr.

This can be simplified by carrying out the integration over X. When the integration order is changed, the limit for X ranges from the max(ξ1,ξ2) to L. Upon integration, we have

F=ρ1v122π0l0ξ2S(ξ1)S(ξ2)[ln(ξ2ξ1)ln4L]dξ1dξ2.

The integral containing the term L is zero because S(0)=S(l)=0 (of course, in addition to S(0)=S(l)=0).

The final formula for the wave drag force may be written as

F=ρ1v122π0l0ξ2S(ξ1)S(ξ2)ln(ξ2ξ1)dξ1dξ2,

or

F=ρ1v122π0l0lS(ξ1)S(ξ2)ln|ξ2ξ1|dξ1dξ2.


The drag coefficient is then given by

Cd=Fρ12v12l2/2.

Since Fρ1v12S2/l2 that follows from the formula derived above, CdS2/l4, indicating that the drag coefficient is proportional to the square of the cross-sectional area and inversely proportional to the fourth power of the body length.

The shape with smallest wave drag for a given volume V and length l can be obtained from the wave drag force formula. This shape is known as the Sears–Haack body.[5][6]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

  1. Von Karman, T., & Moore, N. B. (1932). Resistance of slender bodies moving with supersonic velocities, with special reference to projectiles. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 54(2), 303-310.
  2. Ward, G. N. (1949). Supersonic flow past slender pointed bodies. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 2(1), 75-97.
  3. Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (2013). Fluid mechanics: Landau And Lifshitz: course of theoretical physics, Volume 6 (Vol. 6). Elsevier. section 123. pages 123-124
  4. Whitham, G. B. (2011). Linear and nonlinear waves. John Wiley & Sons. pages 335-336.
  5. Haack, W. (1941). Geschossformen kleinsten wellenwiderstandes. Bericht der Lilienthal-Gesellschaft, 136(1), 14-28.
  6. Sears, W. R. (1947). On projectiles of minimum wave drag. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 4(4), 361-366.