Hurwitz space

From testwiki
Revision as of 14:08, 13 November 2024 by imported>Beranger Seguin (Small corrections and writing improvements)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

In mathematics, in particular algebraic geometry, Hurwitz spaces are moduli spaces of ramified covers of the projective line, and they are related to the moduli of curves. Their rational points are of interest for the study of the inverse Galois problem, and as such they have been extensively studied by arithmetic geometers. More precisely, Hurwitz spaces classify isomorphism classes of Galois covers with a given automorphism group G and a specified number of branch points. The monodromy conjugacy classes at each branch point are also commonly fixed. These spaces have been introduced by Adolf Hurwitz[1] which (with Alfred Clebsch and Jacob Lüroth) showed the connectedness of the Hurwitz spaces in the case of simply branched covers (i.e., the case where G is a symmetric group and the monodromy classes are the conjugacy class of transpositions).

Motivation

Let G be a finite group. The inverse Galois problem for G asks whether there exists a finite Galois extension F whose Galois group is isomorphic to G. By Hilbert's irreducibility theorem, a positive answer to this question may be deduced from the existence, instead, of a finite Galois extension F(T) with Galois group G. In other words, one may try to find a connected ramified Galois cover of the projective line 1 over whose automorphism group is G. If one requires that this cover be geometrically connected, that is F¯=, then this stronger form of the inverse Galois problem is called the regular inverse Galois problem.

A motivation for constructing a moduli space of G-covers (i.e., geometrically connected Galois covers of 1 whose automorphism group is G) is to transform the regular inverse Galois problem into a problem of Diophantine geometry: if (geometric) points of the moduli spaces correspond to G-covers (or extensions of ¯(T) with Galois group G) then it is expected that rational points are related to regular extensions of (T) with Galois group G.

This geometric approach, pioneered by John G. Thompson, Michael D. Fried, Gunter Malle and Wolfgang Matzat,[2] has been key to the realization of 25 of the 26 sporadic groups as Galois groups over — the only remaining sporadic group left to realize being the Mathieu group M23.

Definitions

Configuration spaces

Let G be a finite group and n be a fixed integer. A configuration is an unordered list of n distincts points of 𝔸1(). Configurations form a topological space: the configuration space Confn of n points. This space is the analytification (see GAGA) of an algebraic scheme 𝒰n, which is the open subvariety of 𝔸n obtained by removing the closed subset corresponding to the vanishing of the discriminant.

The fundamental group of the (topological) configuration space Confn is the Artin braid group Bn, generated by elementary braids σ1,,σn1 subject to the braid relations (σi and σj commute if |ij|>1, and σiσi+1σi=σi+1σiσi+1). The configuration space has the homotopy type of an Eilenberg–MacLane space K(Bn,1).[3][4]

Template:Math-covers and monodromy conjugacy classes

A G-cover of 1 ramified at a configuration 𝐭Confn is a triple (Y,p,f) where Y is a connected topological space, p:Y1𝐭 is a covering map which does not extend into a cover of 1𝐭 where 𝐭 is a configuration with less than n points, and f is a group isomorphism Aut(Y,p)G. Up to isomorphism, a G-cover is determined by its monodromy morphism, which is a conjugacy class of group homomorphisms π1(1𝐭,)G.

One may choose a generating set of the fundamental group π1(1𝐭,) consisting of homotopy classes of loops γ1,,γn, each rotating once counterclockwise around each branch point, and satisfying the relation γ1γn=1. Such a choice induces a correspondence between G-covers and conjugacy classes of tuples (g1,,gn)Gn satisfying g1gn=1 and such that g1,,gn generate G: here, gi is the image of the loop γi under the monodromy morphism.

The conjugacy classes of G containing the elements g1,,gn do not depend on the choice of the loops γi. They are the monodromy conjugacy classes of a given G-cover. We denote by Vn the set of n-tuples (g1,,gn) of elements of G satisfying g1gn=1 and generating G. If 𝐜=(c1,,cn) is a list of conjugacy classes of G, then Vn𝐜 is the set of such tuples with the additional constraint gici.

Hurwitz spaces

Topologically, the Hurwitz space classifying G-covers with n branch points is an unramified cover of the configuration space Confn whose fiber above a configuration 𝐭 is in bijection, via the choice of a generating set of loops in π1(1𝐭,), with the quotient Vn/G of Vn by the conjugacy action of G. Two points in the fiber are in the same connected component if they are represented by tuples which are in the same orbit for the action of the braid group Bn induced by the following formula:σi.(g1,,gn)=(g1,,gi+1gi,gi,,gn).

This topological space may be constructed as the Borel construction GVn//Bn:[5][6] its homotopy type is given by Conf~n×Bn(Vn/G), where Conf~n is the universal cover EBn of the configuration space ConfnBBn, and the action of the braid group Bn on Vn/G is as above.

Using GAGA results, one shows that space is the analyfication of a complex scheme, and that scheme is shown to be obtained via extension of scalars of a [1|G|]-scheme G,n by a descent criterion of Weil.[7][8] The scheme G,n is an étale cover of the algebraic configuration space 𝒰n. However, it is not a fine moduli space in general.

In what follows, we assume that G is centerless, in which case G,n is a fine moduli space. Then, for any field K of characteristic relatively prime to |G|, K-points of G,n correspond bijectively to geometrically connected G-covers of K1 (i.e., regular Galois extensions of K(T) with Galois group G) which are unramified outside n points. The absolute Galois group of acts on the ¯-points of the scheme G,n, and the fixed points of this action are precisely its -points, which in this case correspond to regular extensions of (T) with Galois group G, unramified outside n places.

Applications

The rigidity method

If conjugacy classes (c1,,cn) are given, the list (c1,,cn) is rigid when there is a tuple (g1,,gn)c1××cn unique up to conjugacy such that g1gn=1 and g1,,gn generate G — in other words, Vn𝐜/G is a singleton (see also rigid group). The conjugacy classes c1,,cn are rational if for any element gici and any integer k relatively prime to the order of gi, the element gik belongs to ci.

Assume G is a centerless group, and fix a rigid list of rational conjugacy classes 𝐜=(c1,,cn). Since the classes c1,,cn are rational, the action of the absolute Galois group G=Gal(¯) on a G-cover with monodromy conjugacy classes c1,,cn is (another) G-cover with monodromy conjugacy classes c1,,cn (this is an application of Fried's branch cycle lemma[9]). As a consequence, one may define a subscheme G,n𝐜 of G,n consisting of G-covers whose monodromy conjugacy classes are c1,,cn.

Take a configuration 𝐭. If the points of this configuration are not globally rational, then the action of G on G-covers ramified at 𝐭 will not preserve the ramification locus. However, if 𝐭𝒰n() is a configuration defined over (for example, all points of the configuration are in 𝐀1()), then a G-cover branched at 𝐭 is mapped by an element of G to another G-cover branched at 𝐭, i.e. another element of the fiber. The fiber of G,n𝐜𝒰n above 𝐭 is in bijection with Vn𝐜/G, which is a singleton by the rigidity hypothesis. Hence, the single point in the fiber is necessarily invariant under the G-action, and it defines a G-cover defined over .

This proves a theorem due to Thompson: if there exists a rigid list of rational conjugacy classes of G, and Z(G)=1, then G is a Galois group over . This has been applied to the Monster group, for which a rigid triple of conjugacy classes (c1,c2,c3) (with elements of respective orders 2, 3, and 29) exists.

Thompson's proof does not explicitly use Hurwitz spaces (this rereading is due to Fried), but more sophisticated variants of the rigidity method (used for other sporadic groups) are best understood using moduli spaces. These methods involve defining a curve inside a Hurwitz space — obtained by fixing all branch points except one — and then applying standard methods used to find rational points on algebraic curves, notably the computation of their genus using the Riemann-Hurwitz formula.[2]

Statistics of extensions of function fields over finite fields

Several conjectures concern the asymptotical distribution of field extensions of a given base field as the discriminant gets larger. Such conjectures include the Cohen-Lenstra heuristics and the Malle conjecture.

When the base field is a function field over a finite field 𝔽q(T), where q=pr and p does not divide the order of the group G, the count of extensions of 𝔽q(T) with Galois group G is linked with the count of 𝔽q-points on Hurwitz spaces. This approach was highlighted by works of Jordan Ellenberg, Akshay Venkatesh, Craig Westerland and TriThang Tran.[10][6][11][12] Their strategy to count 𝔽q-points on Hurwitz spaces, for large values of q, is to compute the homology of the Hurwitz spaces, which reduces to purely topological questions (approached with combinatorial means), and to use the Grothendieck trace formula and Deligne's estimations of eigenvalues of Frobenius (as explained in the article about Weil conjectures).

See also

References

Template:Reflist