Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2022 January 12
Template:Error:not substituted
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < January 11 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Dec | January | Feb >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
January 12
The sign of harmonic addition theorem
Template:Plain link has the following equations Template:NumBlk Template:NumBlk given that . In addition, the following equation can be found in the Template:Plain link Template:NumBlk which implies Template:NumBlk Now, consider the case Template:NumBlk Template:NumBlk According to Template:EquationNote and Template:EquationNote, should be positive. According to Template:EquationNote, Template:EquationNote and Template:EquationNote, should be negative. Aforementioned results of seem to be inconsistent. So what mistakes have I made? - Justin545 (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Equation Template:EquationNote is accompanied by . The function arctan is in principle multivalued, but its value is conventionally restricted to . The sign of c comes from that convention. In your equation Template:EquationNote you break that convention, and if you insist on breaking it, then you must switch the sign in Template:EquationNote. --Wrongfilter (talk) 18:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks you for the help. Indeed, signs of and are the same if . And it seems signs of and are different if . So, if I understand correctly, how about rewrite Template:EquationNote as
- in order to make sure Template:EquationNote and Template:EquationNote are consistent for all angles. - Justin545 (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Or maybe replace in Template:EquationNote by the RHS of Template:EquationNote:
- given that - Justin545 (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you're really trying to achieve and for some reason you always omit the second equation (or , if you prefer). You need two equations to find . --Wrongfilter (talk) 20:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- given that - Justin545 (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)