Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 December 9

From testwiki
Revision as of 01:29, 17 December 2021 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving December 9)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < December 8 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Nov | December | Jan >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


December 9

Article has Huge cardinals and n-Huge cardinals and almost n-Huge cardinals discussed. Also 0-Huge cardinal is measurable. What is almost 0-Huge cardinal, anything? Grutgrutwhatever (talk) 05:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

So per our article, an "almost 0-huge" κ would be the critical point of a nontrivial elementary embedding j:VM such that M is closed under <j0(κ)-sequences; that is, <κ-sequences. However, because κ is the critical point of a nontrivial elementary embedding at all, κ must be measurable, and therefore must actually be 0-huge.
It seems the conclusion is that "almost 0-huge" is the same as "0-huge" (that is; measurable).
However, it still seems possible that a particular embedding might be almost 0-huge without being 0-huge. That is, a particular embedding j might satisfy the "almost 0-huge" property without satisfying the "0-huge" property, but some different embedding would still witness that the critical point of the first embedding is 0-huge. Off the top of my head I don't know whether that can happen or not. --Trovatore (talk) 06:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)