Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 November 23

From testwiki
Revision as of 17:16, 4 July 2022 by imported>Qwerfjkl (Subst signature (via WP:JWB))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < November 22 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Oct | November | Dec >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


November 23

Relationship between a function's fixed points and roots?

Is there any connection between the zeros of a function and its fixed points? It almost seems as if there must be. (However to be quite honest I can't even articulate why I would think such a thing in the first place!) Earl of Arundel (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

For a given function, no. The fixed points of a function f are exactly the zeroes of xxf(x), and the zeroes of a function g are exactly the fixed points of xxg(x). So you can turn any "find a zero" problem into a "find a fixed point" problem and vice versa. —Kusma (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Ah, well of course. Thanks! Earl of Arundel (talk) 18:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Here is a connection that is more a curiosity than anything deep. Given a function f defined on the reals and a real number x, consider the following three propositions:
Template:Quad(A)Template:Quadx is a fixed point of f;
Template:Quad(B)Template:Quadx is a zero of f;
Template:Quad(C)Template:Quadx=0.
If any two among these three propositions hold, so too does the third.  --Lambiam 22:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Interesting! Which trivially implies that any given polynomial function f(x) lacking any sort of constant term must also therefore have at least one fixed point at f(0)=0. It is a rather simple relationship as you say still pretty elegant... Earl of Arundel (talk) 00:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Searching for a root that way is called fixed point iteration fwiw. 2601:648:8202:350:0:0:0:69F6 (talk) 08:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Let u be any function such that u(0)=0. Given function g, define f by f(x)=x+u(g(x)). Then a zero of g is a fixed point of f (but the converse is not necessarily true). This is a more general version of the schema given above by Kusma, which corresponds to the choice u(x)=x. The larger generality can sometimes be used to achieve convergence in fixed-point iteration where the choice u(x)=x would diverge. See also Cobweb plot.  --Lambiam 10:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Neat! It's such a nice result. Does this theorem have a name? Here the function u(x)=2x2x (blue) is used to construct a synthetic fixed point with f(x)=x+u(g(x)) (orance) precisely at the real root of g(x)=12x2+x1 (green), which in this case just happens to be 1/4. Earl of Arundel (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)