Chronological calculus

From testwiki
Revision as of 18:24, 27 March 2021 by imported>JCW-CleanerBot (task, replaced: (N.S.) → |series=New Series, added orphan tag)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Orphan

Chronological calculus is a formalism for the analysis of flows of non-autonomous dynamical systems. It was introduced by A. Agrachev and R. Gamkrelidze in the late 1970s. The scope of the formalism is to provide suitable tools to deal with non-commutative vector fields and represent their flows as infinite Volterra series. These series, at first introduced as purely formal expansions, are then shown to converge under some suitable assumptions.

Operator representation of points, vector fields and diffeomorphisms

Let M be a finite-dimensional smooth manifold.

Chronological calculus works by replacing a non-linear finite-dimensional object, the manifold M, with a linear infinite-dimensional one, the commutative algebra C(M). This leads to the following identifications:

  • Points qM are identified with nontrivial algebra homomorphisms
q^:C(M) defined by q^(a)=a(q).
  • Diffeomorphisms P:MM are identified with C(M)-automorphisms P^:C(M)C(M) defined by (P^a)(q)=a(P(q)).
  • Tangent vectors vTqM are identified with linear functionals v^:C(M) satisfying the Leibnitz rule v^(ab)=v^(a)b(q)+a(q)v^(b) at q.
  • Smooth vector fields VVec(M) are identified with linear operators V^:C(M)C(M)

satisfying the Leibnitz rule V^(ab)=V^(a)b+aV^(b).

In this formalism, the tangent vector V(P(q)) is identified with the operator qPV.

We consider on C(M) the Whitney topology, defined by the family of seminorms

as,K:=sup{|αaqα(q)|qK,αdim(M),|α|s},

Regularity properties of families of operators on C(M) can be defined in the weak sense as follows: tAt satisfies a certain regularity property if the family tAt(a) satisfies the same property, for every aC(M). A weak notion of convergence of operators on C(M) can be defined similarly.

Volterra expansion and right-chronological exponential

Consider a complete non-autonomous vector field (t,q)Xt(q) on M, smooth with respect to q and measurable with respect to t. Solutions to q˙(t)=Xt(q(t)), which in the operator formalism reads

Template:NumBlk

define the flow of Xt, i.e., a family of diffeomorphisms tPt, P0=Id. The flow satisfies the equation

Template:NumBlk

Rewrite Template:EquationNote as a Volterra integral equation Pt=Id+0tPτ1Xτ1dτ1.

Iterating one more time the procedure, we arrive to

Pt=Id+0tPτ1Xτ1dτ1=Id+0t(Id+0τ1Pτ2Xτ2dτ2)Xτ1dτ1=Id+0tXτ1dτ1+0t0τ1Pτ2Xτ2Xτ1dτ2dτ1.

In this way we justify the notation, at least on the formal level, for the right chronological exponential Template:NumBlk

where Δn(t)={(τ1,,τn)n0τ1τnt} denotes the standard n-dimensional simplex.

Unfortunately, this series never converges on C(M); indeed, as a consequence of Borel's lemma, there always exists a smooth function aC(M) on which it diverges. Nonetheless, the partial sum

Sm(t)=Id+n=1mΔn(t) XτnXτ1dτndτ1

can be used to obtain the asymptotics of the right chronological exponential: indeed it can be proved that, for every aC(M), s0 and KM compact, we have

Template:NumBlk

for some C>0, where K=s[0,t]Ps(K). Also, it can be proven that the asymptotic series Sm(t) converges, as m+, on any normed subspace LC(M) on which Xt is well-defined and bounded, i.e.,

Xt(L)L,XtL:=sup{Xt(a)LaL,aL1}<+.

Finally, it is worth remarking that an analogous discussion can be developed for the left chronological exponential Qt, satisfying the differential equation

ddtQt=XtQt,Q0=Id.

Variation of constants formula

Consider the perturbed ODE

ddtPt=Pt(Xt+Yt),P0=Id.

We would like to represent the corresponding flow, Pt=exp0t(Xτ+Yτ)dτ, as the composition of the original flow exp0tXτdτ with a suitable perturbation, that is, we would like to write an expression of the form

Pt=exp0t(Xτ+Yτ)dτ=Rtexp0tXτdτ.

To this end, we notice that the action of a diffeomorphism S on M on a smooth vector field W, expressed as a derivation on C(M), is given by the formula

S*W=S1WS=AdS1(W).

In particular, if St=exp0tVτdτ, we have

ddt(AdSt)W=ddtStWSt=St(VtWWVt)St=AdSt[Vt,W]=(AdSt)adVtW.

This justifies the notation

AdSt=exp0tadVτdτ.

Now we write

ddtPt=Pt(Xt+Yt)=PtXt+Rtexp0tXτdτYt

and

ddtPt=R˙texp0tXτdτ+Rtexp0tXτdτXt=R˙texp0tXτdτ+PtXt

which implies that

R˙t=Rt(exp0tadXτdτ)Yt,R0=Id.

Since this ODE has a unique solution, we can write

Rt=exp0t(exp0τadXθdθ)Yτdτ,

and arrive to the final expression, called the variation of constants formula:

Template:NumBlk

Finally, by virtue of the equality (AdP)exp0tVτdτ=exp0t(AdP)Vτdτ, we obtain a second version of the variation of constants formula, with the unperturbed flow exp0tXτdτ composed on the left, that is,

Template:NumBlk

Sources