Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 February 19
From testwiki
Revision as of 04:06, 26 February 2016 by imported>Scsbot (edited by robot: archiving February 19)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Template:Error:not substituted
{| width = "100%"
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < February 18 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Jan | February | Mar >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
February 19
Cartesian product in constructive mathematics
Is there a constructive proof (i.e. a proof in constructive mathematics) of the fact that if a Cartesian product of sets is a singleton, then all of the sets are singletons? Classically, if is the unique element of the Cartesian product , and , then one can consider the family where and if , and from this deduce that , showing that is a singleton for all . GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- I may be missing something stupid but it seems like your proof works constructively. Let the Cartesian product be where is the tuple as a function on . I'll say is a singleton if , i.e. if . Then you want to prove . The proof is: given , take ; given , define ; then , so , so . -- BenRG (talk) 03:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)