Velocity filter

From testwiki
Revision as of 17:57, 5 February 2025 by imported>Hairy Dude (Introduction: missed a few more italics; rm comment about undefined variables (that was my mistake))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Too technical

A velocity filter removes interfering signals by exploiting the difference between the travelling velocities of desired seismic waveform and undesired interfering signals.

Introduction

Template:Confusing In geophysical applications sensors are used to measure and record the seismic signals.[1][2] Many filtering techniques are available in which one output waveform is produced with a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the individual sensor recordings. Velocity filters are designed to remove interfering signals by exploiting the difference between the travelling velocities of desired seismic waveform and undesired interfering signals.[3] In contrast to the one dimensional output produced by multi-channel filtering, velocity filters produce a two-dimensional output.

Consider an array of Template:Mvar sensors that receive one desired and Template:Mvar undesired broadband interferences. Let the measurement of Template:Mvarth sensor be modeled by the expression:

Template:NumBlk

where

The parameters Template:Math and Template:Math are amplitude gain and time delays of the signal Template:Math when received at the Template:Mvarth sensor.

Without loss of generality, we shall assume that Template:Math is the desired signal and Template:Math are the undesired interferences. Additionally we shall assume that Template:Math, and Template:Math. This essentially means that the data has been time shifted to align the desired seismic signal so that it appears on all sensors at the same time and balanced so that the desired signal appears with equal amplitudes. We assume that the signals are digitized prior to being recorded and that the length Template:Mvar of time sequences of recorded data is large enough for the complete delayed interfering waveforms to be included in the recorded data. In the discrete frequency domain, the Template:Mvarth trace can be expressed as:

Template:NumBlk

where Template:Math is the sampling angular frequency.

Using matrix notation, (2) can be expressed in the form:

Template:NumBlk Template:NumBlk Template:NumBlk

Velocity filtering

Frequency domain multichannel filters Template:Math can be applied to the data to produce one single output trace of the form:[4][5]

Template:NumBlk

In matrix form, the above expression can be written as:

Template:NumBlk

where Template:Math is an Template:Math vector whose elements are the individual channel filters. That is,

Template:NumBlk

By following the procedure discussed in Chen & Simaan (1990),[6][7] an optimum filter vector F(k) can be designed to attenuate, in the least square sense, the undesired coherent interferences Template:Math while preserving the desired signal Template:Math in Template:Math. This filter can be shown to be of the form:

Template:NumBlk

where Template:Mvar is an arbitrary Template:Math nonzero vector, Template:Math, Template:Mvar is the unit matrix, Template:Math is a submatrix of the matrix obtained by dropping all linearly dependent rows, and Template:Math is a lower triangular matrix satisfying:

[L(k)Br(k)][L(k)Br(k)]H=I Template:NumBlk

The multichannel processing scheme described by equations 6 to 10 produces one dimensional output trace. A velocity filter, on the other hand, is a two-dimensional filter which produces a two-dimensional output record.

A two-dimensional record can be generated by a procedure which involves repeatedly applying multichannel optimum filters to a small number of overlapping subarrays of the input data,.[8][9]

Fig. 1. A sliding subarray of multichannel filters

More specifically, consider a subarray of Template:Mvar channels, where Template:Math, which slides over the input data as shown in Fig. 1. For every subarray position an optimum multichannel filter based on (9) can be designed so that the undesired interferences are suppressed from its corresponding output trace. In designing this filter we use Template:Mvar instead of Template:Mvar in expression (9). Thus traces Template:Math of the input record produce the first trace of the output record, traces Template:Math of the input record produce the Template:Mvarth trace of the output record, and traces Template:Math of the input record produce the Template:Mathst trace, which is the last trace, of the output record. For a large Template:Mvar and small Template:Mvar, as is typically the case in geophysical data, the output record can be viewed as comparable in dimensions to the input record. Clearly for such a scheme to work effectively Template:Mvar must be as small as possible; while at the same time it must be large enough to provide the necessary attenuation of the undesired signals. Note that a maximum of Template:Math undesired interferences can be totally suppressed by such a scheme.[10][11]

References

Template:Reflist

  1. J. H. Justice (1985), "Array processing in exploration seismology", in S. Haykin, ed., Array Signal Processing, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, chap. 2, pp. 6–114.
  2. E. A.Robinson and T. S. Durrani (1986), Geophysical Signal Processing, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  3. R. L.Sengbush and M. R. Foster (February 1968), "Optimum multichannel velocity filters", Geophysics, vol. 33, pp. 11–35.
  4. M. T. Hanna and M. Simaan (December 1985), "Absolutely optimum filters for sensor arrays", IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-33, pp. 1380–1386.
  5. M. T. Hanna and M. Simaan (July 1985), "Array filters for sidelobe elimination", IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. OE-10, pp. 248–254.
  6. C. M. Chen and M. Simaan, "Frequency-domain filters for suppression of multiple interferences on array data", in Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Albuquerque, New Mexico), 3-6 April 1990, pp. 1937–1940.
  7. C. M. Chen, Optimum multichannel filters for multiple undesired interferences on sensor arrays (Ph.D. thesis), Signal Processing and Interpretation Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh. Rep. SPIL No. 91-01, 1991.
  8. M. Simaan and P. L. Love (March 1984), "Optimum suppression of coherent signals with linear moveout in seismic data", Geophysics, vol. 49, pp. 215–226.
  9. M. T. Hanna and M. Simaan (June 1987), "Design and implementation of velocity filters using multichannel array processing techniques", IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35, pp. 864–877.
  10. Chih-Ming Chen and Marwan A. Simaan (July 1991), "Velocity Filters for Multiple Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Geophysical Data", IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol 29, No.4, pp. 563–570.
  11. Magdy T. Hanna (November 1998), "Velocity Filters for multiple interference attenuation in Geophysical Array Data", IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol 26, No. 6, pp. 741–748.