Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2015 March 11

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < March 10 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Feb | March | Apr >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

March 11

Derivative limit

Does the derivative of $x^2-|x^2-1|+2||x|-1|+2|x|$ exist at $x=\pm 1$? 70.190.182.236 (talk) 04:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

This looks rather like a homework question. Show what you've tried and we can help you where you get stuck. —Quondum 05:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

It's not homework- I was just hoping for an answer. 70.190.182.236 (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Have you tried drawing a graph of the function? This should give you an idea of what's happening at the points of interest. (Later hint, after drawing the graph myself: think very carefully about how derivatives are defined...) RomanSpa (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Plugging it into the limit definition of the derivative, no, it looks like it does not exist. (limit of (3 - abs(1 - (1 + h)^2) + 2*abs(1 + h) + 2*abs(1 - abs(1 + h)) + (1 + h)^2)/h as h -> 0)70.190.182.236 (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Take a look at the graph, and see what you think. —Quondum 20:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Cut the crap- looking at the graph I would expect the derivative to exist- but the limit says it does not. 70.190.182.236 (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

It exists. For the positive branch of the x = +1 side, we have:

$\underset{h\to 0^{+}}{\lim }\frac{((1+h{)}^2-|(1+h{)}^2-1|+2||1+h|-1|+2|1+h|)-3}{h}$

$=\underset{h\to 0^{+}}{\lim }\frac{(1+2h+h^2-(2h+h^2)+2h+2+2h)-3}{h}$

$=\underset{h\to 0^{+}}{\lim }\frac{(3+4h)-3}{h}=4$

I'll leave showing the negative branch and the x = -1 case to the reader. Dragons flight (talk) 03:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I improved the LaTeX notation a bit [1]. Please check the point, where the limit is calculated: did you really mean x approaching zero from above? --CiaPan (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Not x. $h=x-1$ is approaching 0 from above, as in $f^{\prime }(x_0)=\underset{x\to x_0}{\lim }\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}=\underset{h\to 0}{\lim }\frac{f(x_0+h)-f(x_0)}{h}$. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 08:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The function is clearly even (x only appears as an absolute value or a square), so -1 doesn't need to be checked separately. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 08:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The problem terms are those involving $||x|-1|$. Complete the square appropriately. If $||x|-1|$ appears in a linear term, then the function is not differentiable. If it appears only as a quadratic term, then the function is differentiable. Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Template:U, that would lead me to draw the wrong conclusion. $|x^2-1|$ is also a problem term, and it interacts in a nontrivial way at the points of interest. I think RomanSpa's approach leads to a more intuitive understanding. —Quondum 18:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but $|x^2-1|=||x|-1|(|x|+1)$. Hence my vague "complete the square appropriately" ;-) Sławomir Biały (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed that. Besides I would have missed what it meant. Back to remedial class for me Template:Smiley —Quondum 18:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)