Gopakumar–Vafa invariant

From testwiki
Revision as of 02:38, 3 January 2025 by imported>Guangbox (Mathematical definitions)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In theoretical physics, Rajesh Gopakumar and Cumrun Vafa introduced in a series of papers[1][2][3][4] numerical invariants of Calabi-Yau threefolds, later referred to as the Gopakumar–Vafa invariants. These physically defined invariants represent the number of BPS states on a Calabi–Yau threefold. In the same papers, the authors also derived the following formula which relates the Gromov–Witten invariants and the Gopakumar-Vafa invariants.

g=0βH2(M,)GW(g,β)qβλ2g2=g=0k=1βH2(M,)GV(g,β)1k(2sin(kλ2))2g2qkβ ,

where

  • β is the class of holomorphic curves with genus g,
  • λ is the topological string coupling, mathematically a formal variable,
  • qβ=exp(2πitβ) with tβ the Kähler parameter of the curve class β,
  • GW(g,β) are the Gromov–Witten invariants of curve class β at genus g,
  • GV(g,β) are the Gopakumar–Vafa invariants of curve class β at genus g.

Notably, Gromov-Witten invariants are generally rational numbers while Gopakumar-Vafa invariants are always integers.

As a partition function in topological quantum field theory

Gopakumar–Vafa invariants can be viewed as a partition function in topological quantum field theory. They are proposed to be the partition function in Gopakumar–Vafa form:

Ztop=exp[g=0k=1βH2(M,)GV(g,β)1k(2sin(kλ2))2g2qkβ] .

Mathematical approaches

While Gromov-Witten invariants have rigorous mathematical definitions (both in symplectic and algebraic geometry), there is no mathematically rigorous definition of the Gopakumar-Vafa invariants, except for very special cases.

On the other hand, Gopakumar-Vafa's formula implies that Gromov-Witten invariants and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants determine each other. One can solve Gopakumar-Vafa invariants from Gromov-Witten invariants, while the solutions are a priori rational numbers. Ionel-Parker proved that these expressions are indeed integers.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References


Template:Quantum-stub