Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2014 June 16
From testwiki
Revision as of 15:51, 25 February 2022 by imported>MalnadachBot (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Template:Error:not substituted
{| width = "100%"
|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < June 15 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< May | June | Jul >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
Contents
June 16
Evaluating an Integral
How would one prove that ? — GX, May 1971 (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about the notation on the right side of your equation (do you mean 1/(-a C a)?), but my first thought is the binomial theorem followed by term-by-term integration. I have this hunch that it's related to the gamma function or beta function.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- By doing that, I was able to re-write the definite integral as a convergent infinite series, but how this will help in solving the actual problem is beyond me.
- GX, May 1971 (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hhm... after finding that this would fall flat on its face at first, I then tried the substitution which converts the integral to . This kinda resembles the beta function. I'll investigate further later on this evening.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- It should be there, not — GX, May 1971 (talk) 02:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- After further investigation (thanks for that correction, by the way), I use the substitution to obtain . Since and are constant, I finally get an expression in terms of the incomplete beta function, .--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- It should be there, not — GX, May 1971 (talk) 02:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hhm... after finding that this would fall flat on its face at first, I then tried the substitution which converts the integral to . This kinda resembles the beta function. I'll investigate further later on this evening.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)